Management of acute COPD exacerbations in France: A qualitative survey in a private practice setting.

BACKGROUND: The current prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in France is estimated to be 2.6 million and is predicted to increase to 2.8 million by 2025. Presently, there is a lack of data on COPD management within the private healthcare setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the management of COPD exacerbations by pulmonologists within private practices in France. METHODS: A prospective, online, qualitative survey was distributed to private practice pulmonologists in France. The survey covered all aspects of COPD management from diagnosis and therapeutic management, to secondary prevention and organization of care. Survey responses were collected between 27 January 2018 and 18 June 2018 and all data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: The survey had a response rate of 20.6%, with 116 out of 563 pulmonologists providing responses. Overall, 87.4% of respondents stated that the management of COPD represented over 15% of their total clinical activity. Most respondents indicated that they work closely with general practitioners and a large multidisciplinary team to manage patients with numerous comorbidities. Following a COPD exacerbation, the majority of respondents (78.4%) were in favor of using respiratory-connected devices (class 2a-connected medical device according to the French HAS classification and available on medical prescription) to assist with patient follow-up at home. CONCLUSIONS: COPD management forms part of the core clinical activity for pulmonologists within the private practice setting in France. Patients with COPD generally have multiple comorbidities and are managed by a multidisciplinary team in line with French guidelines. The use of respiratory-connected devices was highlighted as an important new strategy for improving patient care following a COPD exacerbation.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is difficult in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and exacerbation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PE in patients with COPD and exacerbation of unknown origin and explore factors associated with PE. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital in France. PATIENTS: 211 consecutive patients, all current or former smokers with COPD, who were admitted to the hospital for severe exacerbation of unknown origin and did not require invasive mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) and ultrasonography within 48 hours of admission and assessment of the Geneva score. Patients were classified as PE positive (positive results on CTA or negative results on CTA and positive results on ultrasonography) or PE negative (negative results on CTA and negative results on ultrasonography or negative results on CTA and no recurrence of PE at follow-up 3 months later). RESULTS: 49 of 197 patients (25% [95% CI, 19% to 32%]) met the diagnostic criteria for PE. Clinical factors associated with PE were previous thromboembolic disease (risk ratio, 2.43 [CI, 1.49 to 3.94]), malignant disease (risk ratio, 1.82 [CI, 1.13 to 2.92]), and decrease in PaCO2 of at least 5 mm Hg (risk ratio, 2.10 [CI, 1.23 to 3.58]). A total of 9.2% (CI, 4.7% to 15.9%) of patients with a low-probability Geneva score received a diagnosis of PE. An exploratory analysis suggested that substituting malignant disease for recent surgery in the Geneva score might improve its performance in excluding PE in this sample who were more likely to have malignant disease than to have had recent surgery. However, this improvement seems insufficient to exclude PE with enough certainty to withhold therapy for low-risk patients on the basis of the modified score. LIMITATIONS: This study was done in only 1 center. Patients with COPD requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit were not included. The upper bound of the 95% CI for the low probability of PE according to the Geneva score is too high to rule out PE. The classification of COPD exacerbation of unknown origin was based on the clinician's assessment, not on a standard evaluation for all patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed a 25% prevalence of PE in patients with COPD hospitalized for severe exacerbation of unknown origin. Three clinical factors are associated with the increased risk for PE. The Geneva score and the modified Geneva score should be prospectively evaluated in patients with COPD.