Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Eur Urol Focus ; 6(2): 397-403, 2020 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30316824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A remote interaction between a console surgeon (CS) and a bedside surgeon (BS) makes the role of the latter critical. No conclusive data are reported about the length of the learning curve of a BS. OBJECTIVE: To highlight the role of a BS during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to analyze the effect of the learning curve of a BS on intra- and postoperative outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From June 2013 to September 2016, 129 RARPs were performed by one expert CS (>1000 RARPs) and two BSs (residents). According to the learning curve of the BS, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (first 20 procedures), group 2 (21-40 procedures), and group 3 (>40 procedures). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Preoperative variables, pathological data, operating time (OT), blood loss (BL), number of lymph nodes excised (LE), length of hospital stay (LHS), and time to catheter removal (CR) were analyzed. Linear/logistic regression analyses tested the impact of BS experience on surgical outcomes. T test and chi-square test compared the outcomes of the two BSs. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Perfect interaction between CSs and BSs are requested to obtain the optimal exposure and avoid any conflict. On the linear regression model, BS learning curve was not related to OT, BL, LHS, and CR, but was related to LE (r2=0.09; p=0.03). On multivariate analyses, no correlation between BS experience and OT, BL, LHS, CR, LE, margin status, and complications (all p>0.05) was found. Comparing the two BSs, no difference was found for the abovementioned outcomes in the first 40 surgeries (all p>0.05). Study limitations include the limited cohort of patients and its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, BS learning curve does not appear to influence the surgical outcomes; good experience of the CS was probably the explanation. PATIENT SUMMARY: In our experience, it is the primary surgeon who dictates the perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.


Assuntos
Curva de Aprendizado , Prostatectomia/educação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel do Médico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Urologia
3.
Eur Urol Focus ; 5(6): 1105-1111, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29534873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Flexible ureteroscopy is an established treatment modality for evaluating and treating abnormalities in the upper urinary tract. Reusable ureteroscope (USC) durability is a significant concern. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the durability of the latest generation of digital and fiber optic reusable flexible USCs and the factors affecting it. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Six new flexible USCs from Olympus and Karl Storz were included. The primary endpoint for each USC was its first repair. Data on patient and treatment characteristics, accessory device use, ureteroscopy time, image quality, USC handling, disinfection cycles, type of damage, and deflection loss were collected prospectively. INTERVENTION: Ureteroscopy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: USC durability was measured as the total number of uses and ureteroscopy time before repair. USC handling and image quality were scored. After every procedure, maximal ventral and dorsal USC deflection were documented on digital images. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 198 procedures were performed. The median number of procedures was 27 (IQR 16-48; 14h) for the six USCs overall, 27 (IQR 20-56; 14h) for the digital USCs, and 24 (range 10-37; 14h) for the fiber optic USCs. Image quality remained high throughout the study for all six USCs. USC handling and the range of deflection remained good under incremental use. Damage to the distal part of the shaft and shaft coating was the most frequent reason for repair, and was related to intraoperative manual forcing. A limitation of this study is its single-center design. CONCLUSIONS: The durability of the latest reusable flexible USCs in the current study was limited to 27 uses (14h). Damage to the flexible shaft was the most important limitation to the durability of the USCs evaluated. Prevention of intraoperative manual forcing of flexible USCs maximizes their overall durability. PATIENT SUMMARY: Current flexible ureteroscopes proved to be durable. Shaft vulnerability was the most important limiting factor affecting durability.


Assuntos
Reutilização de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Ureteroscópios/tendências , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Sistema Urinário/diagnóstico por imagem , Equipamentos para Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Reutilização de Equipamento/normas , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/instrumentação , Humanos , Longevidade , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Ureteroscópios/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
World J Urol ; 36(10): 1673-1679, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680950

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the opinion of urologists and their audience regarding patient safety and educational value of live surgical demonstrations (LSD) and semi-live surgical demonstrations (semi-LSD). METHODS: Following the '2017 Challenges in Endourology' meeting, a survey addressing patient safety and the educational value of LSD and semi-LSD was disseminated online to all participants. Survey outcomes of LSD and semi-LSD were compared. RESULTS: All 279 respondents attended both LSD and semi-LSD. Overall, 53% of said respondents stated that patient safety was always the highest priority for LSD, while 74% noted the same for semi-LSD. The complication risk in LSD was perceived equal by 57% of the respondents when compared to cases of similar difficulty in routine practice, while 38% perceived it as a greater risk. For semi-LSD, the complication risk was perceived equal by 84%, while 5% perceived it to be a greater risk in comparison to general practice. On a scale from 0 (no value) to 10 (highly valuable), the average educational value of LSD and semi-LSD was rated 8.4 and 8.3, respectively. A substantial percentage of the surgeons who perform LSD express concerns that live surgery is not the optimal setting to ensure patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: LSD remains a popular tool for surgical education among urologists and their audience. However, patient safety remains a concern and is perceived less of a concern for semi-LSD. The educational value of LSD and semi-LSD was scored equally high. Therefore, we should consider to advocate the use of semi-LSD more often.


Assuntos
Segurança do Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Urologistas , Urologia/educação , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos
5.
World J Urol ; 35(11): 1745-1756, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28523365

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of endourological live surgical demonstrations (LSDs) and routine surgical practice (RSP) for urinary stones. METHODS: Consecutive ureterorenoscopic (URS) and percutaneous (PNL) urinary stone procedures over a 5-year period were reviewed. Procedures were divided into LSDs and RSP. Differences between the groups were separately analysed for URS and PNL. Primary outcomes included intra- and post-operative complication rates and grades. Secondary outcomes were operation time, length of hospital stay, stone-free rate, and retreatment rate. Pearson's Chi-square analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic and linear regression were used to compare outcomes between LSDs and RSP. RESULTS: During the study period, we performed 666 URSs and 182 PNLs, and 151 of these procedures were LSDs. Among URSs, the overall intra-operative complication rate was 3.2% for LSDs and 2.5% for RSP (p = 0.72) and the overall post-operative complication rate was 13.7% for LSDs and 8.8% for RSP (p = 0.13). Among PNLs, the overall intra-operative complication rate was 8.9% for LSDs and 5.6% for RSP (p = 0.52) and the overall post-operative complication rate was 28.6% for LSDs and 34.9% for RSP (p = 0.40). For both URSs and PNLs, no statistically significant differences in complication grade scores were observed between LSDs and RSP. Operation time was significantly longer for LSD-URS group, but there was no difference between the PNL groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and stone-free rate. The retreatment rate was higher in the LSD-URS group compared with RSP-URS group but similar between the PNL groups. Multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusting for confounders, revealed no association between LSD and more or less favourable outcomes as compared to RSP. CONCLUSION: Live surgical demonstrations do not seem to compromise patients' safety and outcomes when performed by specialised endourologists.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/educação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/educação , Urologia/educação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cálculos Coraliformes/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...