Role of prognostic scores in predicting in-hospital mortality and failure of non-invasive ventilation in adults with COVID-19.

We tested the prognostic performance of different scores for the identification of subjects with acute respiratory failure by COVID-19, at risk of in-hospital mortality and NIV failure. We conducted a retrospective study, in the Medical High-Dependency Unit of the University-Hospital Careggi. We included all subjects with COVID-19 and ARF requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) between March 2020 and January 2021. Clinical parameters, the HACOR score (Heart rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, Respiratory Rate) and ROX index ((SpO2/FiO2)/respiratory rate) were collected 3 (-3) and 1 day (-1) before the NIV initiation, the first day of treatment (Day0) and after 1 (+1), 2 (+2), 5 (+5), 8 (+8) and 11 (+11) of treatment. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and NIV failure. We included 135 subjects, mean age 69±13 years, 69% male. Patients, who needed mechanical ventilation, showed a higher HACOR score (Day0: 6 [5-7] vs 6 [6-7], p=.057; Day+2: 6 [6-6] vs 6 [4-6], p=.013) and a lower ROX index (Day0: 4.2±2.3 vs 5.1±2.3, p=.055; Day+2: 4.4±1.2.vs 5.5±1.3, p=.001) than those with successful NIV. An HACOR score >5 was more frequent among nonsurvivors (Day0: 82% vs 58%; Day2: 82% vs 48%, all p<0.01) and it was associated with in-hospital mortality (Day0: RR 5.88, 95%CI 2.01-17.22; Day2: RR 4.33, 95%CI 1.64-11.41) independent to age and Charlson index. In conclusion, in subjects treated with NIV for ARF caused by COVID19, respiratory parameters collected after the beginning of NIV allowed to identify those at risk of an adverse outcome. An HACOR score >5 was independently associated with increased mortality rate.

Monocyte distribution width and the fighting action to neutralize sepsis (FANS) score for sepsis prediction in emergency department.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sepsis markers and to develop a multiparametric score, using demographic and clinical variables as well as laboratory parameters to predict sepsis in patients admitted in the ED with suspected symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical presentation of suspected sepsis were enrolled in the ED of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo between September 2019 and May 2020. Anagraphic, anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data were collected for all subjects. PCT, MDW, WBC, MPV and BT were utilised to formulate FANS score. RESULTS: The AUC of the FANS score, PCT, MDW and CRP was 0.87, 0.80, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively, when used to predict sepsis in all 308 subjects. Instead, the AUC of the FANS (Fighting Action To Neutralize Sepsis) score, PCT, MDW and CRP was 0.93, 0.84, 0.83 and 0.77, respectively, when used to predict sepsis excluding subjects with infection (clinically classified as the Infections group). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with PCT, PCR and MDW confirm the results of these markers for the identification of sepsis obtained from other studies. The multiparametric approach, obtained from the statistical study of the parameters using binary logistic regression, identified those PCT, WBC, MPV, BT and MDW as the most significant and effective clinical classifiers for diagnosing sepsis.

Prediction of Mortality With the Use of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.

BACKGROUND: In actuality, it is difficult to obtain an early prognostic stratification for patients with acute respiratory failure treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV). We tested whether an early evaluation through a predictive scoring system could identify subjects at risk of in-hospital mortality or NIV failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, which included all the subjects with acute respiratory failure who required NIV admitted to an emergency department-high-dependence observation unit between January 2014 and December 2017. The HACOR (heart rate, acidosis [by using pH], consciousness [by using the Glasgow coma scale], oxygenation [by using [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]], respiratory rate) score was calculated before the NIV initiation (T0) and after 1 h (T1) and 24 h (T24) of treatment. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and NIV failure, defined as the need for invasive ventilation. RESULTS: The study population included 644 subjects, 463 with hypercapnic respiratory failure and an overall in-hospital mortality of 23%. Thirty-six percent of all the subjects had NIV as the "ceiling" treatment. At all the evaluations, nonsurvivors had a higher mean ± SD HACOR score than did the survivors (T0, 8.2 ± 4.9 vs 6.1 ± 4.0; T1, 6.6 ± 4.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.4; T24, 5.3 ± 4.5 vs 2.0 ± 2.3 [all P < .001]). These data were confirmed after the exclusion of the subjects who underwent NIV as the ceiling treatment (T0, 8.2 ± 4.9 vs 6.1 ± 4.0 [P = .002]; T1, 6.6 ± 4.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.4; T24, 5.3 ± 4.5 vs 2.0 ± 3.2 [all P < .001]). At T24, an HACOR score > 5 (Relative Risk [RR] 2.39, 95% CI 1.60-3.56) was associated with an increased mortality rate, independent of age and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. CONCLUSIONS: Among the subjects treated with NIV for acute respiratory failure, the HACOR score seemed to be a useful tool to identify those at risk of in-hospital mortality.

Prognostic value of serial lactate levels in septic patients with and without shock.

To analyze the prognostic value of lactate levels for day-7 and in-hospital mortality, in septic patients with and without shock. In the period November 2011-December 2016, we enrolled 268 patients, admitted to our High-Dependency Unit with a diagnosis of sepsis. Lactate dosage was performed at ED-HDU admission (T0), after 2 h (T2), 6 h (T6) and 24 h (T24); lactate clearance was calculated at T2 and T6 [T2: ((LAC T0-LAC T2/LAC T0)*100)]; T6: [(LAC T0-LAC T6/LAC T0)*100]. The end-points were day-7 and in-hospital mortality. At every evaluation, the lactate level was higher in patients with shock than in those without (T0 3.8 ± 3.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.1; T6 2.9 ± 3.2 vs 1.6 ± 1.1; T24 3.0 ± 4.4 vs 1.4 ± 0.9 meq/L, all p < 0.001). Among patients with shock, an analysis for repeated measures confirmed a more marked lactate level reduction in survivors compared with non-survivors, both by day-7 and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.057 and p = 0.006). A Kaplan-MeIer analysis confirmed a significantly better day-7 survival in patients with T6 (with shock 86% vs 70%; without shock 93% vs 82, all p < 0.05) and T24 (with shock 86% vs 70%; without shock 93% vs 82, all p < 0.05) lactate ≤ 2 meq/L, compared with patients with higher levels. A T6 lactate clearance > 10% was more frequent among in-hospital survivors in the whole study population (57% vs 39%) and in patients with shock (74% vs 46%, all p < 0.05). Higher lactate levels and decreased clearance were associated with an increased short-term and intermediate-term mortality regardless of the presence of shock.

Does an imaging stress-test adds information to prognostic scores in patients with chest pain in the emergency department?

We evaluated the ability of a stress-test (Str-T) to improve the risk stratification based on prognostic scores in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. Between 2008, June and 2013, December, 1082 patients with chest pain were evaluated with an imaging Str-T. With a retrospective analysis, patients were stratified according to: (1) Florence Prediction Rule as low (0-1, LR-FPR), intermediate (2-4, IR-FPR), high risk (5-6, HR-FPR), respectively, 26, 50 and 24% of patients; (2) HEART score as LR-HEART, (0-3) and HR-HEART (≥4), respectively, 36 and 64%; (3) likelihood of CAD according to NICE guidelines, 10-29% LR-NICE, 30-60% IR-NICE and > 60% HR-NICE, respectively, 12, 18 and 70%. Scores' diagnostic performance was calculated with Str-T as reference. One-month follow-up by a phone call was performed, to investigate the occurrence of new cardiovascular events. In LR and HR patients, FPR and NICE score showed sensitivity 66 vs 93%, specificity 59 vs 19% (both p < 0.001), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 36 vs 31%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 83 vs 87%. Among LR-HEART patients, Str-T was positive for inducible ischemia in 53 (14%) patients and 12 (4%) of them underwent a percutaneous coronary revascularization. The Str-T was negative for inducible ischemia in 760 (70%) patients, positive in 272 (25%), inconclusive in 50 (5%); among patients in the LR and IR subgroups, incidence of CAD (1.3 and 1.6%) and the cumulative incidence of significant events at 1-month follow-up (both 1%) was very low Str-T improved prognostic scores' diagnostic performance in LR- and HR-subgroups.

Prognostic value of sepsis-induced coagulation abnormalities: an early assessment in the emergency department.

To evaluate if the assessment of coagulation abnormalities at ED admission could improve prognostic assessment of septic patients. This report utilizes a portion of the data collected in a prospective study, with the aim to identify reliable biomarkers for an early sepsis diagnosis. In the period November 2011-December 2016, we enrolled 268 patients, admitted to our High-Dependency Unit with a diagnosis severe sepsis/septic shock. Study-related blood samplings were performed at ED-HDU admission (T0), after 6 h (T6) and 24 h (T24): D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 levels were analyzed. The primary end-points were day-7 and in-hospital mortality. Day-7 mortality rate was 16%. D-dimer (T0: 4661 ± 4562 µg/ml vs 3190 ± 7188 µg/ml; T6: 4498 ± 4931 µg/ml vs 2822 ± 5623 µg/ml; T24 2905 ± 2823 µg/ml vs 2465 ± 4988 µg/ml, all p < 0.05) and TAT levels (T0 29 ± 45 vs 22 ± 83; T6 21 ± 22 vs 15 ± 35; T24 16 ± 19 vs 13 ± 30, all p < 0.05) were higher among non-survivors compared to survivors. We defined an abnormal coagulation activation (COAG+) as D-dimer > 500 µg/ml and TAT > 8 ng/ml (for both, twice the upper normal value). Compared to COAG-, COAG+ patients showed higher lactate levels at the earliest evaluations (T0: 3.3 ± 2.7 vs 2.5 ± 2.3, p = 0.041; T6: 2.8 ± 3.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.6, p = 0.015); SOFA score was higher after 24 h (T24: 6.7 ± 3.1 vs 5.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.008). At T0, COAG+ patients showed a higher day-7 mortality rate (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.14-6.11, p = 0.023), after adjustment for SOFA score and lactate level. Presence of abnormal coagulation at ED admission shows an independent association with an increased short-term mortality rate.

SOFA score in septic patients: incremental prognostic value over age, comorbidities, and parameters of sepsis severity.

Several widely used scoring systems for septic patients have been validated in an ICU setting, and may not be appropriate for other settings like Emergency Departments (ED) or High-Dependency Units (HDU), where a relevant number of these patients are managed. The purpose of this study is to find reliable tools for prognostic assessment of septic patients managed in an ED-HDU. In 742 patients diagnosed with sepsis/severe sepsis/septic shock, not-intubated, admitted in ED between June 2008 and April 2016, SOFA, qSOFA, PIRO, MEWS, Charlson Comorbidity Index, MEDS, and APACHE II were calculated at ED admission (T0); SOFA and MEWS were also calculated after 24 h of ED-High-Dependency Unit stay (T1). Discrimination and incremental prognostic value of SOFA score over demographic data and parameters of sepsis severity were tested. Primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Twenty-eight day mortality rate is 31%. The different scores show a modest-to-moderate discrimination (T0 SOFA 0.695; T1 SOFA 0.741; qSOFA 0.625; T0 MEWS 0.662; T1 MEWS 0.729; PIRO: 0.646; APACHE II 0.756; Charlson Comorbidity Index 0.596; MEDS 0.674, all p < 0.001). At a multivariate stepwise Cox analysis, including age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, MEWS, and lactates, SOFA shows an incremental prognostic ability both at T0 (RR 1.165, IC 95% 1.009-1.224, p < 0.0001) and T1 (RR 1.168, IC 95% 1.104-1.234, p < 0.0001). SOFA score shows a moderate prognostic stratification ability, and demonstrates an incremental prognostic value over the previous medical conditions and clinical parameters in septic patients.

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED.

BACKGROUND: Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a diagnosis, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients presenting with dyspnea and admitted after ED evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The gold standard was the final diagnosis assessed by two expert reviewers. Two physicians independently evaluated the patient; a sonographer performed an ultrasound evaluation of the lung, heart, and inferior vena cava, while the treating physician requested traditional tests as needed. Time needed to formulate the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses was recorded and compared. Accuracy and concordance of the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2,683 patients were enrolled. The average time needed to formulate the ultrasound diagnosis was significantly lower than that required for ED diagnosis (24 ± 10 min vs 186 ± 72 min; P = .025). The ultrasound and the ED diagnoses showed good overall concordance (κ = 0.71). There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of PoCUS and the standard ED evaluation for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and dyspnea from other causes. PoCUS was significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of heart failure, whereas a standard ED evaluation performed better in the diagnosis of COPD/asthma and pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: PoCUS represents a feasible and reliable diagnostic approach to the patient with dyspnea, allowing a reduction in time to diagnosis. This protocol could help to stratify patients who should undergo a more detailed evaluation.

Utility of repeat head computed tomography after mild head trauma: influence on short- and long-term prognosis and health-related quality of life.

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of repeat head CT in a large population of patients with non-isolated blunt mild head trauma (MTBI), especially in the presence of intracranial injury. This is a study of a cohort of 478 non-isolated MTBI patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University-Hospital of Florence from July 2008 to December 2013. Results of initial and subsequent head CT scans, and indications for repeat head CT scan (routine vs. neurologic change) were recorded. The study population was divided into two subgroups: 28 (6 %) patients with neurological change or persistently reduced GCS (group GCS-) and 450 (94 %) patients with normal or improving GCS (group GCS+). After 6 months from the event, a telephone interview using SF12 questionnaire was conducted. Among GCS- patients, the admission CT scan showed intracranial lesions (ICI) in 16 (57 %) patients; only two patients had a TBI-related neurosurgical intervention. Among GCS+ patients, the first CT scan showed an ICI in 133 patients; in a significant proportion of patients with ICI at the first CT scan, the injury worsened (40/133, 30 %, p < 0.0001). However, no GCS+ patient had any neurosurgical intervention. We observed a significant reduction in both MCS and PCS scores after the injury compared with the previous period. The number of repeat CT scan was high in patients who presented ICI at the first CT scan; however, no patient with ICI and normal or improving GCS score needed a neurosurgical intervention.

Can non-invasive ventilation modify central venous pressure? Comparison between invasive measurement and ultrasonographic evaluation.

Central venous pressure (CVP) is primarily measured to assess intravascular volume status and heart preload. In clinical practice, the measuring device most commonly used in emergency departments and intensive care units, is an electronic transducer that interconnects a central venous catheter (CVC) with a monitoring system. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) consists in a breathing support that supplies a positive pressure in airways through a mask or a cask though not using an endotracheal prosthesis. In emergency settings, non-invasive ultrasonography evaluation of CVP, and hence of intravascular volume status entail the measurement by a subxiphoid approach of inferior vena cava diameter and its variations in relation to respiratory activity. In the literature, there are many studies analyzing the ability to estimate CVP through ultrasonography, rating inspiratory and expiratory vena cava diameters and their ratio, defined as inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI). At the same time, the effects of invasive mechanical ventilation on blood volume and the correlation during ventilation between hemodynamic invasive measurement of CVP and inferior vena cava diameters have already been demonstrated. Nevertheless, there are no available data regarding the hemodynamic effects of NIV and the potential correlations during this kind of ventilation between invasive and non-invasive CVP measurements. Therefore, this study aims to understand whether there exists or not an interrelationship between the values of CVP assessed invasively through a CVC and non-invasively through the IVC-CI in patients with severe respiratory distress, and above all to evaluate if these means of assessment can be influenced using NIV.

Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography combined with procalcitonin for the diagnosis of pneumonia: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of lung infections is known. No studies evaluated the combination of LUS and PCT for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the emergency department (ED). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of LUS and PCT in the diagnosis of pneumonia. METHODS: Patients with respiratory symptoms of unexplained origin who underwent a chest CT in ED were included in the study if PCT assay was available. LUS was performed before CT and was targeted to the detection of lung consolidations with the morphologic features of pneumonia. A PCT assay was performed at presentation, and cut-off of 0.25 and of 0.5 ng/ml were used to rule-out and rule-in pneumonia. The final diagnosis of pneumonia was established by independent clinicians, on the basis of clinical chart review including CT results. RESULTS: We enrolled 128 patients and pneumonia was the final diagnosis in 61 (47.7%). In 38 patients (29.7%) LUS and PCT were negative (PCT < 0.25 ng/ml). The overall accuracy, sensitivity and negative predictive value of LUS/PCT were 88.8, 96.7 and 94.7% respectively. Sensitivity of the LUS/PCT test was significantly superior to LUS alone (85.2%) and PCT alone (73.8%) (p < 0.05 for both). Specificity and positive predictive value of the combination of positivity of LUS/PCT (PCT > 0.5 ng/ml) were 94% and 83.3% respectively. Specificity of LUS/PCT was not significantly different to LUS alone (88.1%) (p = 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the combination of LUS with PCT for the diagnosis of pneumonia was significantly superior when compared with the sensitivity of LUS and PCT alone.

Accuracy of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of consolidations when compared to chest computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: Despite emerging evidences on the clinical usefulness of lung ultrasound (LUS), international guidelines still do not recommend the use of sonography for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Our study assesses the accuracy of LUS for the diagnosis of lung consolidations when compared to chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This was a prospective study on an emergency department population complaining of respiratory symptoms of unexplained origin. All patients who had a chest CT scan performed for clinical reasons were consecutively recruited. LUS was targeted to evaluate lung consolidations with the morphologic characteristics of pneumonia, and then compared to CT. RESULTS: We analyzed 285 patients. CT was positive for at least one consolidation in 87 patients. LUS was feasible in all patients and in 81 showed at least one consolidation, with a good inter-observer agreement (k = 0.83), sensitivity 82.8% (95% CI 73.2%-90%) and specificity 95.5% (95% CI 91.5%-97.9%). Sensitivity raised to 91.7% (95% CI 61.5%-98.6%) and specificity to 97.4% (95% CI 86.5%-99.6%) in patients complaining of pleuritic chest pain. In a subgroup of 190 patients who underwent also chest radiography (CXR), the sensitivity of LUS (81.4%, 95% CI 70.7%-89.7%) was significantly superior to CXR (64.3%, 95% CI 51.9%-75.4%) (P<.05), whereas specificity remained similar (94.2%, 95% CI 88.4%-97.6% vs. 90%, 95% CI 83.2%-94.7%). CONCLUSIONS: LUS represents a reliable diagnostic tool, alternative to CXR, for the bedside diagnosis of lung consolidations in patients with respiratory complains.

Comparison of exercise electrocardiogram and exercise echocardiography in intermediate-risk chest pain patients.

BACKGROUND: The novel exercise computer-assisted high-frequency QRS analysis (HF/QRS) has demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity over the conventional ST/electrocardiogram-segment analysis (ST/ECG) in the detection of myocardial ischemia. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic value of the validated exercise echocardiography (ex-Echo) with the novel exercise ECG (ex-ECG) including HF/QRS and ST/ECG analysis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary care teaching Hospital. Patients with chest pain (CP), normal resting ECGs, troponins, and echocardiography, labeled as "intermediate-risk" for adverse coronary events, underwent the novel ex-ECG and ex-Echo. An ST-segment depression of at least 2 mV or at least 1 mV when associated with CP was considered as an index of ischemia, as well as a decrease of at least 50% in HF/QRS intensity, or new wall motion abnormalities on ex-Echo. Exclusion criteria were QRS duration of at least 120 milliseconds, poor echo-acoustic window, and inability to exercise. Patients were followed up to 3 months. The end point was the composite of coronary stenoses of 50% or greater at angiography or acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and cardiovascular death on the 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of 188 patients enrolled, 18 achieved the end point. The novel ex-ECG and ex-Echo showed comparable negative predictive value (97% vs 96%; P = .930); however, sensitivity was 83% vs 61%, respectively (P = .612), and specificity was 64% vs 92%, respectively,(P = .026). The areas on receiver operating characteristic analysis were comparable (ex-ECG: 0.734 [95% confidence interval, or CI, 0.62-0.85] vs ex-Echo: 0.767 [CI, 0.63-0.91]; C statistic, P = .167). On multivariate analysis, both ex-ECG (hazard ratio, 5; CI, 1-20; P = .017) and ex-Echo (HR, 12; CI, 4-40; P < .001) were predictors of the end point. CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate-risk CP patients, the novel ex-ECG including HF/QRS added to ST/ECG analysis was a valuable diagnostic tool and might be proposed to avoid additional imaging. However, the novel test needs additional study before it can be recommended as a replacement for current techniques.

Quality of life after mild to moderate trauma.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate potential reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after a mild to moderate trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Follow-up study of a cohort of 153 trauma patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University-Hospital of Florence from July 2008 to February 2012. After 6 months from the event, a telephone interview using the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Health Composite Score (SF12) was conducted. Patients reported their HRQOL both at present and before trauma. Scores ≥ 50 represent no disability; 40-49, mild disability; 30-39, moderate disability; and below 30, severe disability. RESULTS: Before the event 143 (93%) subjects reported a normal PCS and MCS. After the events, a significantly lower proportion of patients maintained a normal PCS and MCS values (52 and 68%, all p<0.01). One, two, three and four PCS items worsened in 14%, 15%, 18% and 38% of the study population, while one, two, three or four MCS dimensions worsened in 12%, 19%, 19% and 24%. We identified 109 subjects (N+), which showed normal PCS and MCS values before trauma, in the absence of any pre-existing medical condition. After the event, we observed a significant PCS (before: 54, standard deviation, SD 6; after 43, SD 11, p<0.0001) and MCS (before: 55, SD 7; after 47, SD 11, p<0.0001) worsening among N+ subjects. Distribution across the four disability categories was 52, 24, 17 and 6% for MCS score and 38, 25, 27 and 11% for PCS score: overall 8 (7%) patients reported a moderate disability and 5 (5%) reported a severe disability in both dimensions. Compared with subjects with preserved values, patients with an abnormal (<39) HRQOL were older, showed a higher prevalence of female gender and pre-existing medical conditions and a worst Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. An advanced age (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.010-1.057, p=0.005) and a higher SOFA T1 score (OR 1.500, 95% CI 1.027-2.190, p=0.036) were independently associated with a worsening PCS. CONCLUSIONS: After a mild trauma, we evidenced a relevant reduction in HRQOL; an advanced age and a higher degree of organ dysfunction were independently associated with HRQOL deterioration.

Nuclear scan strategy and outcomes in chest pain patients value of stress testing with dipyridamole or adenosine.

OBJECTIVE: To update the prognostic value of scan strategy with pharmacological stress agent in chest pain (CP) patients presenting with normal electrocardiography (ECG) and troponin. METHODS: Two consecutive nonrandomized series of patients with CP and negative first-line workup inclusive of serial ECG, serial troponin, and echocardiography underwent myocardial perfusion imaging single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the emergency department. Of 170 patients enrolled, 52 patients underwent dipyridamole-SPECT and 118 adenosine-SPECT. Patients with perfusion defects underwent angiography, whereas the remaining patients were discharged and followed-up. Primary endpoint was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, and cardiovascular death at follow-up or the presence of coronary stenosis > 50% at angiography. RESULTS: At multivariate analysis, the presence of perfusion defects or hypertension was independent predictor of the primary endpoint. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were higher in patients subjected to adenosine-SPECT (95% and 99%, respectively) versus dipyridamole-SPECT (56% and 89%; yield 70% and 11%, respectively; P < 0.03). Of note, sensitivity, negative, and positive predictive values were high in patients with hypertension (100%, 93%, and 60%, respectively) or nonischemic echocardiography alterations (100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In CP patients, presenting with normal ECG and troponin, adenosine-SPECT adds incremental prognostic values to dipyridamole-SPECT. Costly scan strategy is more appropriate and avoids unnecessary angiograms in patients with hypertension or nonischemic echocardiography alterations.

Long-term prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients presenting to the ED with spontaneous chest pain.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of stress echocardiography (SE) in patients evaluated in emergency department (ED) and to determine SE parameters that best predicted outcome. METHODS: Between June 2008 and July 2012, 626 patients with an episode of spontaneous chest pain underwent SE (exercise stress echocardiography or dobutamine stress echocardiography [DSE]). Between December 2012 and January 2013, all patients were contacted to verify the occurrence of cardiac events. Patients were divided in 3 subgroups according to peak stress Wall Motion Score Index (pWMSI): normal peak wall motion (pWMSI, 1; group A1), mild to moderate peak asynergy (pWMSI, 1.1-1.7; group A2), and severe peak asynergy (pWMSI, >1.7; group A3). RESULTS: Stress echocardiography showed inducible ischemia in 159 patients (25%); it was negative in 425 (68%) and inconclusive in 42 (7%). Patients with cardiac events more frequently showed inducible ischemia (50% vs 26%; P = .015) compared with patients with good prognosis; a normal SE (14% vs 61%) was significantly less common. At a multivariate regression analysis, an increased pWMSI (relative risk: 9.816, 95% confidence interval: 3.665-26.290; P < .0001) was independently associated with a bad outcome. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly worse with an increasing degree of peak wall motion asynergy (99% in group A1; 96%, group A2; and 88% in group A3; P = .011 between A1 and A2 groups, P = .012 between A2 and A3 groups, and P < .0001 between A1 and A3 groups). CONCLUSIONS: Stress echocardiography showed an optimal prognostic value among ED patients evaluated for chest pain. The presence of an extensive asynergic area at peak stress was associated with an adverse prognosis.

Prognosis and health-related quality of life in elderly patients after a mild to moderate trauma.

The aims of this study were to compare outcome after a mild to moderate trauma in three subgroups of patients of increasing age (A1: <50, A2: 50-74, A3: >74 years) and to assess potential health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impairment. This is a follow-up study of a cohort of 418 trauma patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Florence from July 2008 to February 2012. Six months after the event, a telephone interview using the Physical component summary (PCS) and Mental component summary (MCS) Health Composite Score (SF12) was conducted. Patients reported their QOL both at present and before trauma. In-hospital mortality was 10 of 418 (2.3 %); overall mortality was 27 of 244 (11 %) patients found at follow-up. No death was observed among A1 patients; overall mortality was (6/76) 7 % in A2 and (21/71) 30 % in A3 patients (p < 0.05 A1 vs A2, A1 vs A3 and A2 vs A3). Before the event, respectively, 94 and 96 % patients reported a normal MCS and PCS score (>39); after the event, the proportion of patients with a normal score value was significantly lower (MCS 70 %, p = 0.002; PCS 58 %, p < 0.0001). All subgroups showed a highly significant reduction in the scores' value due to the trauma. After the event, the proportion of patients with normal scores was significantly lower (all p < 0.0001, except for MCS score in A1 subgroup, who showed p = 0.013) within all subgroups. Elderly patients' prognosis was significantly worse compared with the younger counterpart; despite young patients' optimal outcome, HRQOL was uniformly reduced across all age groups.