[Thin layer agar represents a cost-effective alternative for the rapid diagnosis of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis]. / Agar de capa delgada: Una opción costo-efectiva para el diagnóstico rápido de tuberculosis multirresistente.

OBJECTIVE: Using cost-benefit analysis for comparing the thin-layer agar culture method to the standard multiple proportion method used in diagnosing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). METHODS: A cost-benefit evaluation of two diagnostic tests was made at the Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB) in Medellín, Colombia. RESULTS: 100 patients were evaluated; 10.8% rifampicin resistance and 14.3% isoniazid resistance were found. A computer-based decision tree model was used for cost-effectiveness analysis (Treeage Pro); the thin-layer agar culture method was most cost-effective, having 100% sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for detecting rifampicin and isoniazid resistance. The multiple proportion method value was calculated as being US$ 71 having an average 49 day report time compared to US$ 18 and 14 days for the thin-layer agar culture method. DISCUSSION: New technologies have been developed for diagnosing tuberculosis which are apparently faster and more effective; their operating characteristics must be evaluated as must their effectiveness in terms of cost-benefit. The present study established that using thin-layer agar culture was cheaper, equally effective and could provide results more quickly than the traditional method. This implies that a patient could receive MDR TB treatment more quickly.

Agar de capa delgada: Una opción costo-efectiva para el diagnóstico rápido de tuberculosis multirresistente / Thin layer agar represents a cost-effective alternative for the rapid diagnosis of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Objetivo Realizar un análisis de costo efectividad comparando el método de cultivo en agar de capa delgada y el método estándar de proporciones múltiples, utilizados en el diagnóstico de Tuberculosis Multi-drogorresistente (TB MDR). Métodos Estudio de evaluación económica en el cual se evalúan los costos y la efectividad de dos pruebas diagnósticas, ejecutado en la Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas-CIB en Medellín, Colombia. Resultados Se evaluaron 100 pacientes, encontrando una prevalencia de resistencia a la Rifampicina de 10,8 % y resistencia a Isoniazida de 14,3 %. Se presenta un análisis en términos de costo-efectividad mediante el diseño de un árbol de decisiones (Treeage Pro ®), resultando ser la prueba basada en cultivo en agar de capa delgada más costo-efectiva; con valores de sensibilidad, especificidad y predictivos del 100 % para detectar resistencia a Rifampicina e Isoniazida. El valor del método de las proporciones múltiples fue calculado en US$ 71, con una media de tiempo para ser reportado de 49 días versus US$ 18 y 14 días respectivamente para el cultivo en agar de capa delgada. Discusión Se han desarrollado nuevas tecnologías para el diagnóstico de Tuberculosis, aparentemente más rápidas y efectivas, que deben ser evaluadas no solo en sus características operativas, sino también en términos de costo-efectividad. El presente estudio establece que el empleo de la capa delgada es menos costoso, igualmente efectivo, y puede aportar resultados más rápidamente; cuando se compara con el método tradicional. Esto implica, entre otros aspectos, que el paciente pueda recibir más oportunamente el tratamiento dirigido para TB MDR.

Objective Using cost-benefit analysis for comparing the thin-layer agar culture method to the standard multiple proportion method used in diagnosing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). Methods A cost-benefit evaluation of two diagnostic tests was made at the Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB) in Medellín, Colombia. Results 100 patients were evaluated; 10.8 % rifampicin resistance and 14.3 % isoniazid resistance were found. A computer-based decision tree model was used for cost-effectiveness analysis (Treeage Pro); the thin-layer agar culture method was most cost-effective, having 100 % sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for detecting rifampicin and isoniazid resistance. The multiple proportion method value was calculated as being US$ 71 having an average 49 day report time compared to US$ 18 and 14 days for the thin-layer agar culture method. Discussion New technologies have been developed for diagnosing tuberculosis which are apparently faster and more effective; their operating characteristics must be evaluated as must their effectiveness in terms of cost-benefit. The present study established that using thin-layer agar culture was cheaper, equally effective and could provide results more quickly than the traditional method. This implies that a patient could receive MDR TB treatment more quickly.