Laparoscopic versus Open Adrenalectomy for Stage I/II Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

AIM: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for stage I and II adrenocortical carcinoma. The issue of level I evidence is entirely unreturned. METHODS: Electronic databases were used to search for articles from 1992 to 2014 in the English language literature. The primary end point of the study was to evaluate the safety of the laparoscopic procedure in terms of complications and the oncologic effectiveness of the procedure comparing the R0 resection, disease free survival and overall survival of patients treated with open adrenalectomy versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. RESULTS: Differences in postoperative complications and R0 resections did not reach statistical significance between treatment arms. There were not statistical significant differences between treatment arms considering the two-year, three-year, four-year overall survival while five-year overall survival was in favor of open adrenalectomy group. There were not statistical significant differences between treatment arms considering the two-year, three-year, four-year, and five-year disease free survival. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that postoperative complications, R0-resection, overall, and disease free survival of stage I/II adrenocortical carcinoma are comparable and independent to the procedure though the five-year survival was in favor of the open group. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimates of effect and may change the estimates.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus open preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia recurrence: a decision analysis based on net health benefits.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the most cost-effective treatment strategy using preperitoneal mesh for patients with recurrent inguinal hernia. Currently, the issue of cost-effectiveness is entirely unresolved. METHODS: A decision analysis was carried out based on the results of a systematic literature review of articles concerning recurrent inguinal hernia repair that were published between 1979 and 2011. A virtual cohort was programmed to undergo three different treatment procedures: (1) laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP), (2) open preperitoneal mesh repair according to Stoppa, and (3) open preperitoneal mesh repair according to Nyhus. We carried out a base-case analysis and varied all variables over a broad range of reasonable hypotheses in multiple one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The average cost-effectiveness ratio of Nyhus, Stoppa, and TEP per quality-adjusted life year was US $ ($)1,942, $1,948, and $2,011, respectively. In terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), Stoppa was dominated. The choice between TEP or Nyhus procedure depends on the combination of a specific center's rates of recurrence and morbidity as disclosed by three-way sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Nyhus and TEP repairs are possible optimal choices depending primarily on the institution's rates of recurrence and morbidity. Based on our net benefit-related decision analysis, a hypothetical "fixed budget trade-off" suggests potential annual incremental health system cost savings of $200,000 attained by shifting care for 1,000 patients from TEP to Nyhus repair (depending on clinical end-points, which is a decisive factor).