[The role of contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the preoperative diagnosis of renal lesions]. / Die Rolle von kontrastmittelverstärktem "pulse inversion harmonic imaging" (CEUS) und kontrastmittelverstärkter Computertomographie (CECT) bei der präoperativen Diagnose von renalen Raumforderungen.

OBJECTIVE: The preoperative assessment of structural and functional changes in renal tumors using contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients referred to two tertiary hospitals for surgery on suspicion of a malignant renal lesion, who had been examined under the predefined study protocol using CEUS and CECT, were prospectively included in the study. All renal lesions suspected of being malignant were subjected to histopathological examination. Lesions expected to be benign were followed up according to the study protocol. The accuracy of CEUS and CECT with the final histology or follow-up results and the statistically significant difference between the two imaging techniques was calculated. RESULTS: Over a period of 3 years (2008-2011), 68 of 93 patients examined met the study criteria. The prevalence of malignant tumors in the study was 72%. Fifty four (79%) patients underwent surgery and had a histologically confirmed renal tumor (clear cell carcinoma 45, urothelial papillocarcinoma 4, angiomyolipoma 1, oncytoma 3, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis 1) and 14 (21%) patients underwent regular follow-up. Specificity, sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) reached 57.9%, 98% and 0.779 for CEUS and 52.6%, 98% and 0.753 for CECT. CONCLUSION: The results show that both imaging methods can reliably rule out malignant disease due to absence of enhancement. Taking into consideration that CEUS can be carried out without severe risk or discomfort, it is time to reconsider CEUS as the method of choice for diagnosis, while CECT should be reserved for staging.

[Image analysis in the differential diagnosis of renal parenchyma lesions]. / Der Beitrag der Bildanalyse für die Differenzialdiagnose der fokalen Nierenparenchymveränderungen.

PURPOSE: Visual analysis of echo intensity is of importance for the differential diagnosis of focal renal lesions. Quantification of the echo intensity and of other parameters might help with differential diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 145 patients with focal renal lesions, digitized images were evaluated (40 angiomyolipomas [group A], 70 renal cell carcinomas [group B], 20 pseudo-tumors [group C] and 15 other focal lesions in group D). With Photoshop®, the average grayscale values of the lesion (defined as echo intensity focal, EF) and its variance s2 (as expression of the inhomogeneity focal, IF) were measured. These measurements were compared to the renal cortex (echo intensity renal cortex=ER, inhomogeneity renal renal cortex=I R). Other calculated parameters: Echo intensity quotient, echo intensity index, inhomogeneity quotient and inhomogeneity index. RESULTS: Angiomyolipomas had a higher echo intensity quotient EQ and echo intensity index EI than renal cell carcinomas, pseudo-tumors and other lesions (p<0.001). Pseudo-tumors had a lower inhomogeneity quotient than angiomyolipomas (p<0.001), renal cell carcinomas (p<0.05). Echo intensity quotient EQ≥2.0 and echo intensity index EI≥0.5 were typical for angiomyolipomas with a sensitivity of 96.4 % and a specificity of 97.3 % for tumors<3 cm. CONCLUSION: Quantitative echo intensity measurements enhance the differential diagnosis of focal renal lesions. The differentiation of typical angiomyolipomas to other lesions could be improved.

[Low grade renal trauma (Part II): diagnostic validity of ultrasonography]. / Poranení ledvin nizsích stupnu (2. cást): Validita ultrasonografie v diagnostice.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to verify whether ultrasonography can be considered a reliable method for the diagnosis of low-grade renal trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group investigated included patients with grade I or grade II blunt renal trauma, as classified by the AAST grading system, in whom ultrasonography alone or in conjunction with computed tomography was used as a primary diagnostic method. B-mode ultrasound with a transabdominal probe working at frequencies of 2.5 to 5.0 MHz was used. Every finding of post-traumatic changes in the renal tissues, i.e., post-contusion hypotonic infiltration of the renal parenchyma or subcapsular haematoma, was included. The results were statistically evaluated by the Chi-square test with the level of significance set at 5%, using Epi Info Version 6 CZ software. RESULTS: The group comprised 112 patients (43 women, 69 men) aged between 17 and 82 years (average, 38 years). It was possible to diagnose grade I or grade II renal injury by ultrasonography in only 60 (54%) of them. The statistical significance of ultrasonography as the only imaging method for the diagnosis of low-grade renal injury was not confirmed (p=0.543) DISCUSSION: Low-grade renal trauma is a problem from the diagnostic point of view. It usually does not require revision surgery and, if found during repeat surgery for more serious injury of another organ, it usually does not receive attention. Therefore, the macroscopic presentation of grade I and grade II renal injury is poorly understood, nor are their microscopic findings known, because during revision surgery these the traumatised kidneys are not usually removed and their injuries at autopsy on the patients who died of multiple trauma are not recorded either. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the validity of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of low-grade renal injury is not significant, because this examination can reveal only some of the renal injuries such as perirenal haematoma. An injury to the renal parenchyma is also indicated by hypoechogenic areas of varying sizes in the renal cortex. A negative ultrasonographic finding is no proof of the absence of renal trauma. As low-grade renal injury is difficult to detect by mere clinical examination or by a single imaging method, the authors regard as necessary to actively look for them, taking into consideration the mechanism of injury, haematuria findings and evaluation of ultrasonographic and CT scans.

[Personal experience with treatment of posttraumatic urethral distraction defects]. / Nase zkusenosti s lécbou posttraumatických uretrálních distrakcních defektu.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Authors present their experience in the treatment of posttraumatic distraction urethral defect resulting from traumatic rupture of posterior urethra. MATERIAL: The group comprised 19 patients with posttraumatic urethral distraction defect (average age 41 year, range 27-65 years). In 16 of them (84%) resection urehtroplasty was performed and in three (16%) endoscopic internal urethrotomy was applied. The patients were evaluated of 19 to 48 months after surgery. METHOD: Urethroplasty was performed at least three months after the trauma, always under general anesthaesia in lithotomic position, using perinal approach. Dissection of bulbar urethra was followed by dissection and resection of fibrous posttraumatic distraction defect (the original membranous urethra). Prostatic apex and proximal end of lumbar urethra were spatulated and bulboprostatic anastomosis was performed restoring urethral continuity. A catheter was left in urethra for three weeks. In 12 patients it was necessary to separe corpora cavernosa addition and 5 patients required a wedge resection of the lower arch of public bones to allow urethral bridge the defect. Endoscopic internal urehtrotomy was also performed minimally three months after trauma, always on position 12 of the clock face opposite to symphysis with a discision of the whole stenotic part. Subsequently, catheter was inserted in urethra and left in place for four days. RESULTS: Resection urethroplasty as primary surgery was successful in 15 (94%) patients and only 1 patients (6%) required another reconstruction surgery. Endoscopic management was not successful in any patients (100%). Two of them (66%) had to undergo repeatedly a reconstruction surgery, the third one (33%) is regularly dilated. All patients after urethroplasty are under regular circumstances continent, only in two of them (13%) there occurs of urine in case of an extreme increase of abdominal pressure. Erectile function already impaired by the trauma did not worsen by the surgery in 4 patients (25%), in 2 patients (13%) with preoperatively normal erections there developed erectile dysfunction after urethroplasty of which in 1 patient a permanent disorder. The quality of life was in general evaluated by patients as excellent. DISCUSSION: Epicystotomy is a simple procedure ensuring urinary diversion in patients with posterior urethral rupture. However, such management of urethral rupture almost always results in the development posttraumatic distraction defect. Incontinence occurs in our group only in 2 (12%) patients, mainly in non-standard situations (gym, urgency). Night incontinence does not occur in our patients at all. Continence is in our patients ensured by lissosfincter which is fully sufficient. Erectile dysfunction may result from a trauma or a treatment. In our group all patients have a preserved erection prior to trauma and trauma was evident cause of the loss of erection only in 2 (12%) patients who were primarily treated by epicystotomy. In another 2 patients (12%) who were primarily treated after trauma for coincidental urinary bladder rupture it is impossible to state what caused the erectile dysfunction whether a fracture or surgery. In the acute phase during the revision of the rupture of posterior urethra the peroperative risk of the impairment of neurovascular bundles responsible for erection is much higher than in planned surgery. Satisfaction of patients with the treatment is reflected in the evaluation of the postoperative results and the quality of life in general. None of our patients managed by delayed internal urethrotomy was cured. One is regularly dilated, another two underwent urethroplasty. CONCLUSION: The technique of resection of urethral distraction defects with bulboprostatic anastomosis is a suitable way of the treatment of the preceding rupture of posterior urethra without impairement of continence or erection. A prerequisite of good results is a simple urine diversion by epicystostomy during the primary management of the posterior urethral rupture. Delayed endoscopic therapy of the distraction defect will not probably cure the patients but will result in regular dilatations. It may be an alternative treatment in polymorbid or biologically older patients.

Testicle hemodynamics in patients after laparoscopic varicocelectomy evaluated using color Doppler sonography.

OBJECTIVES: Testicular blood supply and semen quality were compared in two groups of patients undergoing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: group I (n = 27) with spermatic artery ligation and group II (n = 48) with spermatic artery preservation. METHODS: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed on 75 patients divided on the basis of whether ligation took place during surgery or not. The blood flow parameter (resistance index-RI) measured using color Doppler sonography was the index of vascular efficiency selected. RESULTS: Mean RI was 0.69 in group I and 0.65 in group II. The difference was not significant. Both groups showed improvements in sperm density and motility but there was no significant difference between groups for either parameter. CONCLUSION: Using color Doppler sonography confirms that ligation of the testicular artery during varicocelectomy does not lead to major changes in testicular blood supply or sperm quality.

Contribution of transurethral sonographic examination in diagnostics and treatment of superficial urinary bladder tumours.

For the determination of the operation treatment tactics concerning urinary bladder tumours, the state of the disease stage has the principal importance. Sonography introduction has reflected in more accurate diagnostics. The authors carried out the determination of the stage with the accuracy of 89.3% at 214 patients, having superficial tumours of the urinary bladder, who were treated by transurethral resection. The authors believe, that the most remarkable contribution consists in better possibility of the T2 and T3 stages differentiation.