Primary Care Provider Preferences on Dementia Training: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Dementia has no cure, but interventions can stabilize the progression of cognitive, functional, and behavioral symptoms. Primary care providers (PCPs) are vital for the early detection, and long-term management of these diseases, given their gatekeeping role in the healthcare system. However, PCPs rarely implement evidence-based dementia care due to time limitations and knowledge about diagnosis and treatment. Training PCPs may help address these barriers. OBJECTIVE: We explored the preferences of PCPs for dementia care training programs. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 23 PCPs recruited nationally via snowball sampling. We conducted remote interviews and organized the transcripts for qualitative review to identify codes and themes, using thematic analysis methods. RESULTS: PCP preferences varied regarding many aspects of ADRD training. Preferences varied regarding how to best increase PCP participation in training, and what content and materials were needed to help them and the families they serve. We also found differences regarding the duration and timing of training, and the modality of training sessions (remote versus in-person). CONCLUSION: The recommendations arising from these interviews have the potential to inform the development and refinement of dementia training programs to optimize their implementation and success.

Determining the impact of an interprofessional learning in practice model on learners and patients.

The Institute of Medicine recently expressed a need to measure the impact of interprofessional education (IPE) on health professions collaborative behavior in practice environments and patient outcomes, and the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education has focused research efforts to connect interprofessional practice and education. We describe a model intentionally designed to link interprofessional practice experience in ambulatory care setting and an IPE curriculum for students, called the Interprofessional Learning in Practice (ILIP) model. The study objective was to determine the impact of the ILIP model on student and patient outcomes during a 24-month intervention period. Student satisfaction was collected through a brief survey administered post-ILIP model. Patient outcomes were collected from before and after the intervention period through a retrospective chart review of patients who received care through the ILIP model. For the study, disease indicators for the top three chronic diagnoses of depression, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were chosen as the patient outcomes. Student outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test. Patient outcomes were analyzed using McNemar's test and paired t-tests. Of the 382 students who participated in the ILIP model during the study period, 179 completed surveys, indicating that they valued the experience, valued learning from interprofessional preceptors, and gained interprofessional skills to use in their future practice. During the 24-month intervention, 401 patients were evaluated post-ILIP model, statistically significant results demonstrated HbA1c values for patients with diabetes were reduced by 0.5% and depression screening improved from 9% to 91%. Additionally, patients' hypertension control was similar to baseline and diabetes control (as defined as HbA1c ≤8%) was improved compared to baseline but did not reach statistical significance. By aligning interprofessional practice and education in the ILIP model, students had a positive experience, gained interprofessional collaboration skills, and provided value-added benefits to improve patient outcomes.

Teaching for Practice: The Impact of a Large-Scale Interprofessional Foundational Program.

PURPOSE: The University of Kansas Medical Center has developed an interprofessional education (IPE) foundational program using TeamSTEPPS, a curriculum designed to improve patient care through effective communication and teamwork. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of the Level 1 program on learners as they develop the attitudes, knowledge, and skills related to interprofessional collaborative practice. METHODS: Learners (n=715) representing 15 professions participated in the Level 1 program. A mixed-methods approach was used to assess achievement of learning objectives, learner reactions, modifications of perceptions and attitudes, acquisition of knowledge and skills, and anticipated behaviors. RESULTS: Learners (n=585, 81.8%) agreed that the program was valuable. Positive changes in attitudes were significant pre-post (p<0.001). An average of 80.3% of learners who responded (n=196, 27.4%) correctly answered knowledge survey questions. Furthermore, analysis of open-ended questions suggested that learners gained an increased appreciation for interprofessional communication and better understanding of the roles of other healthcare professions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on positive learner reactions, changes in attitudes and knowledge, and anticipated behaviors associated with this program, similar approaches that incorporate TeamSTEPPS early in professional curricula may be useful for foundational IPE programming due to the intentional alignment with collaborative practice and orientation towards the Quadruple Aim.

An interprofessional objective structured teaching experience (iOSTE): An interprofessional preceptor professional development activity.

There has been a recent shift to develop and implement interprofessional education for learners during their "clinical" years. With this shift comes a specific need to develop preceptors in the area of interprofessional precepting. The interprofessional objective structured teaching experience (iOSTE) is one method for developing preceptors. The iOSTE was developed from experience with an interprofessional teaching clinic. Full and short versions of the iOSTE were implemented across multiple universities. The iOSTE gives preceptors an opportunity to gain experience with key skills associated with precepting interprofessional learners in clinical settings. Participants evaluated the iOSTE after the session using Likert scale ratings and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics, independent samples T-tests, and content analysis were used to analyse the data. A total of 96 individuals from 15 different professions and three different universities participated in the iOSTE, with 59.4% (n = 57) completing the iOSTE evaluation. The iOSTE was highly rated with significant differences between the full and short versions of the iOSTE for three evaluation items. Content analysis revealed common themes that preceptors took away from the experience were of "all voices included" and "interprofessional precepting skills". Overall, the iOSTE appears to a feasible and effective method for developing interprofessional preceptors.

Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 7: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a large-scale required interprofessional education foundational programme.

Health profession educators and administrators are interested in how to develop an effective and sustainable interprofessional education (IPE) programme. We describe the approach used at the University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, United States. This approach is a foundational programme with multiple large-scale, half-day events each year. The programme is threaded with common curricular components that build in complexity over time and assures that each learner is exposed to IPE. In this guide, lessons learned and general principles related to the development of IPE programming are discussed. Important areas that educators should consider include curriculum development, engaging leadership, overcoming scheduling barriers, providing faculty development, piloting the programming, planning for logistical coordination, intentionally pairing IP facilitators, anticipating IP conflict, setting clear expectations for learners, publicising the programme, debriefing with faculty, planning for programme evaluation, and developing a scholarship and dissemination plan.

Student Outcomes Associated with an Interprofessional Program Incorporating TeamSTEPPS®.

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional education (IPE) of health professions students is a starting point for developing collaborative-practice-ready healthcare professionals, ultimately leading to improved patient care. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel, foundational, IPE pilot program that incorporates TeamSTEPPS® for health professions students. METHODS: Students representing 13 different health professions programs participated in successive Level 1 and Level 2 "Foundations of Interprofessional Collaboration: Introduction to TeamSTEPPS®" half-day activities (n = 241). Students' satisfaction with the pilot program, changes in attitudes toward teamwork from before to after participation, TeamSTEPPS® knowledge acquisition, and anticipated future interprofessional collaboration-oriented behavior change were assessed through online surveys. RESULTS: Overall, students were highly satisfied with the pilot program and reported that learning from other professions was valuable. Statistically significant positive changes were noted in attitudes toward teamwork, most notably with the Level 1 pilot. Greater than 80% of students who completed the surveys demonstrated acquisition of TeamSTEPPS® knowledge. Students also reported feeling more prepared to collaborate interprofessionally in their future practice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the two-level foundational pilot program is feasible and had the intended effects with regards to moving health professions students toward becoming collaborative-practice-ready healthcare professionals.

The Impact of an Interprofessional Practice Experience on Readiness for Interprofessional Learning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Professional silos still exist in practice and education. At our institution, all medical students are exposed to an interprofessional (IP) practice experience during their family medicine clerkship. This study examines the impact of this IP practice experience on students' attitudes toward IP learning. In addition, this study examines the further impact on attitudes of a subset of students who were exposed to the IP practice experience integrated within an intentional IPE curriculum built to support and enhance experiential learning. METHODS: All students rotating through the IP practice experience were invited to participate. Only those who completed the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS), both pre-post were included in the analysis. Comparisons were made by school and by exposure to the integrated experiential model. RESULTS: Out of 422, a total of 252 (59.7%) students completed both RIPLS pre-post. Analysis revealed statistically significant pre-post differences for all respondents for Teamwork and Patient-Centeredness. Medicine responses were less favorable for Teamwork and Professional Identity than nursing and pharmacy. For a subset of students exposed to the integrated experiential model, responses were more favorable for Teamwork, Professional Identity, and Patient-Centeredness compared to students without this exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward Teamwork and Patient-Centeredness were more favorable for all respondents after exposure to the IP practice experience. Differences by school might be due to professional culture. Students exposed to the integrated experiential model had more favorable responses across all subscales than those not exposed. For the integrated experiential model to be deemed valuable, assessment of behavior change is warranted.