Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia.

Objectives: To measure case detection and response time of severe pediatric dyslipidemia, defined as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL on the initial screening panel. Although low adherence to guidelines recommending universal pediatric lipid screening is well-documented, it is unknown how clinicians respond to pediatric lipid screening results suggestive of severe dyslipidemia. Study design: This study is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients 0-18 years of age with initial lipid panels completed from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018. A chart review was conducted on all patients with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL to determine indication(s) for the initial lipid panel, specialty of ordering clinician, type of action taken to an abnormal result (repeat laboratory tests, treatment, and/or referral), time from result to clinician action, and diagnosis. Results: There were 16 860 initial lipid panels that met the inclusion criteria; 178 (1.1%) had non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, indicating severe dyslipidemia. The most common indication for screening was universal screening (52%). For all lipid panels with non-HDL ≥190 mg/dL, a clinician action was documented for 47% within 7 days and 69% within 30 days. No follow-up action was documented in 18 (9%). A clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia was the most common diagnosis, in 24% of patients. Conclusions: The majority of lipid panels with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL had some action documented, although the actions varied. Universal screening was the most common indication for testing, clarifying its significance in identifying severe dyslipidemia. Further education and improved management protocols may help responses to severe dyslipidemia in children at high risk for premature cardiovascular disease.

Novel Lipid Thresholds for Screening Predict the Need for Pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and HDL-C thresholds for pediatric nonfasting lipid screens that are more predictive of the need for lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and estimate numbers of potentially avoidable fasting lipid panels. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective review of children and youths aged 8-21 years presenting for preventive cardiology care, initial lipid results, recommendations for pharmacotherapy, and presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors were noted. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis calculated threshold lipid values predicting the need for pharmacotherapy and were applied to 2 screening populations. Rates of potentially unnecessary fasting lipid panels were calculated. RESULTS: A non-HDL-C value >156 mg/dL for children with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors and >199 mg/dL for children without risk factors conferred 95% or greater sensitivity in predicting a recommendation for pharmacotherapy with higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with current guidelines. HDL-C was a poor predictor of pharmacotherapy. Application of the current thresholds to screening populations indicated that 38.5%-92.3% of follow-up fasting lipid panels would not result in pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Using higher non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C thresholds could prevent unnecessary follow-up lipid panels and reduce patient anxiety, cost, and time. This could improve compliance with universal pediatric lipid screening for both health care providers and families.

In pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein(a) is more predictive than LDL-C for early onset of cardiovascular disease in family members.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] ≥ 50 mg/dL predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), but their role for children with FH is less clear. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between elevated Lp(a) and LDL-C levels in a pediatric population with FH and onset of ASCVD in family members. METHODS: Retrospective review of pediatric patients with FH identified LDL-C, Lp(a), and family history of ASCVD. Logistic regression modeling evaluated the association between the child's Lp(a) and peak LDL-C level with earliest age of ASCVD onset in their family. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine children from 109 families were identified. Children from families with early-onset ASCVD were 3 times more likely to have high Lp(a) than those with a family history of late-onset ASCVD (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.16-12.25, P = .027) but were not more likely to have highly elevated peak LDL-C (≥190 mg/dL) (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.11-1.80, P = .26). CONCLUSION: Children with FH and family history of early-onset ASCVD were more likely to have Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL than children with FH and family history of late-onset ASCVD. Family history of early-onset ASCVD was more predictive of a child's Lp(a) level than of a child's peak LDL-C. Measurement of Lp(a) in children with FH may better characterize their cardiovascular risk, particularly when knowledge of family history is limited. Lp(a) testing may also identify children with FH that could benefit from more aggressive management to reduce ASCVD risk.