Diabetes remission in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes after dorzagliatin treatment: A prospective cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the post-treatment effect of dorzagliatin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) regarding the achievement of stable glycaemic control and drug-free diabetes remission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who completed dorzagliatin treatment in the SEED trial and achieved stable glycaemic control were enrolled in this 52-week study without any antidiabetic medication. The primary endpoint was the diabetes remission probability at week 52 using the Kaplan-Meier method. The potential factors that contribute to stable glycaemic control and diabetes remission based on the characteristics of patients before and after treatment with dorzagliatin were analysed. A post hoc sensitivity analysis of diabetes remission probability using the American Diabetes Association (ADA) definition was conducted. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier remission probability was 65.2% (95% CI: 52.0%, 75.6%) at week 52. Based on the ADA definition, the remission probability was 52.0% (95% CI: 31.2%, 69.2%) at week 12. The significant improvements in the insulin secretion index ΔC30/ΔG30 (41.46 ± 77.68, P = .0238), disposition index (1.22 ± 1.65, P = .0030), and steady-state variables of HOMA2-ß (11.49 ± 14.58, P < .0001) and HOMA2-IR (-0.16 ± 0.36, P = .0130) during the SEED trial were important factors in achieving drug-free remission. A significant improvement in time in range (TIR), a measure of glucose homeostasis, in the SEED trial from 60% to more than 80% (estimated treatment difference, 23.8%; 95% CI: 7.3%, 40.2%; P = .0084) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In drug-naïve patients with T2D, dorzagliatin treatment leads to stable glycaemic control and drug-free diabetes remission. Improvements in ß-cell function and TIR in these patients are important contributors to diabetes remission.

Correlation analysis of serum IGF-1 and IL-6 and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease.

Objectives: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most common chronic complications in diabetic patients, and there are major limitations in its pathological diagnosis. This study's objectives were to examine the changes in serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in DKD patients with various urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and to evaluate the utility of these two biological markers in the clinical diagnosis of the condition. Methods: We chose 80 type 2 diabetic patients as the experimental group and 20 healthy normal participants as the control group. The experimental group was split into three groups based on the ACR range: diabetes without nephropathy group (ACR < 30 mg/g), microalbuminuric group (30 < ACR < 300 mg/g), and macroalbuminuric group (ACR > 300 mg/g). The levels of serum IL-6 and IGF-1 were assessed in each trial participant. Results: Serum IGF-1 was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.01), and serum IL-6 levels were also higher than in the control group (P < 0.001). In DKD patients, serum levels of IL-6 and IGF-1 tended to rise when ACR levels rose. By Pearson correlation analysis, serum IGF-1 and IL-6 were positively correlated with ACR (r = 0.765 and r = 0.651, all P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with eGFR (r = -0.389 and r = -0.364, all P < 0.01). Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for serum IGF-1 and IL-6 were 0.9056 and 0.7850, respectively, while the AUR value for both combined was 0.9367. Conclusion: Serum IGF-1 and IL-6 levels can be used to diagnose DKD, and the combined analysis of these two indicators can improve the sensitivity and specificity of the disease diagnosis.

Dorzagliatin add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Metformin, the first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2D), decreases hepatic glucose production and reduces fasting plasma glucose levels. Dorzagliatin, a dual-acting orally bioavailable glucokinase activator targeting both the pancreas and liver glucokinase, decreases postprandial glucose in patients with T2D. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of dorzagliatin as an add-on therapy to metformin were assessed in patients with T2D who had inadequate glycemic control using metformin alone. Eligible patients with T2D (n = 767) were randomly assigned to receive dorzagliatin or placebo (1:1 ratio) as an add-on to metformin (1,500 mg per day) for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by 28 weeks of open-label treatment with dorzagliatin for all patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels from baseline to week 24, and safety was assessed throughout the trial. At week 24, the least-squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c (95% confidence interval (CI)) was -1.02% (-1.11, -0.93) in the dorzagliatin group and -0.36% (-0.45, -0.26) in the placebo group (estimated treatment difference, -0.66%; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.53; P < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. There were no severe hypoglycemia events or drug-related serious adverse events in the dorzagliatin and metformin combined therapy group. In patients with T2D who experienced inadequate glycemic control with metformin alone, dorzagliatin resulted in effective glycemic control with good tolerability and safety profile ( NCT03141073 ).

Dorzagliatin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Improving glucose sensitivity remains an unmet medical need in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). Dorzagliatin is a dual-acting, orally bioavailable glucokinase activator that enhances glucokinase activity in a glucose-dependent manner, improves glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and demonstrates effects on glycemic control in patients with T2D. We report the findings of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dorzagliatin in patients with T2D. Eligible drug-naïve patients with T2D (n = 463) were randomly assigned to the dorzagliatin or placebo group at a ratio of 2:1 for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by 28 weeks of open-label treatment with dorzagliatin for all patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24. Safety was assessed throughout the trial. At week 24, the least-squares mean change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline (95% confidence interval) was -1.07% (-1.19%, -0.95%) in the dorzagliatin group and -0.50% (-0.68%, -0.32%) in the placebo group (estimated treatment difference, -0.57%; 95% confidence interval: -0.79%, -0.36%; P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. There were no severe hypoglycemia events or drug-related serious adverse events in the dorzagliatin group. In summary, dorzagliatin improved glycemic control in drug-naïve patients with T2D and showed a good tolerability and safety profile.

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Although the efficacy of teneligliptin, a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, has been amply studied for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, no clinical trials of teneligliptin have been carried out in China. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy compared with a placebo in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, carried out at 42 sites, enrolled type 2 diabetes patients with glycosylated hemoglobin 7.0 to <10.0% and fasting blood glucose <270 mg/dL. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to treatment with 20 mg teneligliptin or a placebo (n = 127, each) administered orally once daily before breakfast for 24 weeks. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was the primary efficacy end-point. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: The least square mean (LSM) change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.95% with teneligliptin versus -0.14% with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -0.80% (P < 0.0001). For the secondary end-point, from baseline to week 24, the LSM change in fasting blood glucose was -21.9 mg/dL with teneligliptin versus -1.4 mg/dL with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -20.5 mg/dL (P < 0.0001). The adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence rates, including hypoglycemia, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 24 weeks, teneligliptin was generally well tolerated and effective in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

Dorzagliatin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a dose-ranging, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Glucokinase acts as a glucose sensor in the pancreas and a glucose processor in the liver, and has a central role in glucose homoeostasis. Dorzagliatin is a new, dual-acting, allosteric glucokinase activator that targets both pancreatic and hepatic glucokinases. Dorzagliatin has good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in humans, and provides effective 24-h glycaemic control and improves glucose sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dorzagliatin monotherapy at different doses in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) patients to receive oral placebo or one of four doses of oral dorzagliatin (75 mg once a day, 100 mg once a day, 50 mg twice a day, or 75 mg twice a day) using permuted-block randomisation, with a block size of ten and without stratification. Eligible patients were men or non-fertile women (aged 40-75 years) with type 2 diabetes who had a BMI of 19·0-30·0 kg/m2, were on a diet and exercise regimen, and were previously untreated or treated with metformin or α-glucosidase inhibitor monotherapy. The study started with a 4-week placebo run-in period followed by a 12-week treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12, which was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had both baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c value. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02561338. FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2015, and Aug 17, 2016, we randomly assigned 258 patients to one of the five study groups. At the end of 12 weeks, the least squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline was -0·35% (95% CI -0·60 to -0·10) in the placebo group, -0·39% (-0·64 to -0·14) in the 75 mg once daily group, -0·65% (-0·92 to -0·38) in the 100 mg once daily group, -0·79% (-1·06 to -0·52) in the 50 mg twice daily group, and -1·12% (-1·39 to -0·86) in the 75 mg twice daily group. Compared with the placebo group, the change in HbA1c between baseline and 12 weeks was significant in the 50 mg twice daily (p=0·0104) and the 75 mg twice daily (p<0·0001) groups. The number of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups and the placebo group. There were no reports of drug-related serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. INTERPRETATION: Dorzagliatin had a beneficial effect on glycaemic control and was safe and well tolerated over 12 weeks in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Hua Medicine, National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development, Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Project, Shanghai Pudong District Science and Technology Innovation Action Project, and Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Informatisation Innovation Action Project.

Up-regulation of receptor interaction protein 140 promotes glucolipotoxicity-induced damage in MIN6 cells.

The receptor interaction protein 140 (RIP140) cofactor is a key regulator of metabolic balance, but its function in glucose- and lipid-mediated damage in islet ß cells is unknown and was investigated in this study. RIP140 expression and distribution was evaluated in MIN6 cells under high glucose and lipid conditions using real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), western blotting and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cells were separately treated with 500 µM palmitic acid and 25 mM glucose when RIP140 expression was upregulated or downregulated, and cell viability, apoptosis rate, the level of oxidative stress and insulin secretion was assessed, as was the expression of related genes. Increased glucose and palmitic acid elevated RIP140 expression and distribution in nuclei. Overexpression of RIP140 promoted apoptosis but inhibited cell viability in MIN6 cells, and basal insulin secretion and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion levels were altered following treatment with glucose and palmitic acid. In addition, oxidative stress was elevated, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 and uncoupling protein 2 messenger RNA (mRNA) abundance were increased, B-cell lymphoma-2 protein levels were decreased, and peroxisome proliferators activated receptor gamma co-activator 1 alpha, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase , and pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1 mRNA levels were downregulated. Furthermore, glucolipotoxicity-induced damage was reversed when RIP140 expression was downregulated by small interfering RNA (SiRNA). RIP140 promotes islet ß cells damage caused by glucolipotoxicity.

SPLUNC1 Is a Significant Marker in Pleural Effusion from Lung Cancer Compared to Tuberculosis.

SPLUNC1 (Short palate, lung and nasal epithelium clone1) protein is an abundant secretory product of epithelia present throughout the conducting airways. Although its function is still not fully known, most studies have focused on its defensive effect in the infection of human airways and its potential to serve as a molecular marker for lung cancer. In this study, we further evaluated the SPLUNC1 expression in patients with lung disease to explore its role in cancer or tuberculosis at the protein level. We generated a panel of antibodies by using protein from a eukaryotic expression system as the immunogen to mice. It was the panel of SPLUNC1 monoclonal antibodies that allowed us to comparatively determine SPLUNC1 protein in lung cancer and tuberculosis infection by detecting sera and pleural effusion other than airway surface. The results showed that the SPLUNC1 level was not significantly changed either from sera of lung cancer or control. There was a significant increase in pleural effusion from lung cancer when compared to tuberculosis. These results indicate that SPLUNC1 may be a useful marker for tracing lung cancer cells, based on its epithelial origin property in pleural effusion.

[The design and baseline characteristics of a phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mainland China].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the design and the Mainland China subgroup baseline characteristics of the study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as monotherapy, add-on to metformin or add-on to pioglitazone. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week study comparing alogliptin (ALO, 25 mg, 1/d) versus placebo (PLA) as monotherapy (A), add-on to metformin (B) or add-on to pioglitazone ± metformin (C). The T2DM subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) between 7% and 10% and aged between 18 years and 75 years were enrolled and randomized to the alogliptin group and the placebo group in 1: 1 ratio with 16 weeks treatment. All patients were followed up every 4 weeks. The safety endpoints consisted of the incidence of hypoglycemia and other adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the Mainland China subgroup of the study (181 in group A, 186 in group B and 124 in group C). In each treatment group, the baseline characteristics including age, gender, body mass index, diabetes duration, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, daily dosage of metformin and daily dosage of pioglitazone were all well balanced. CONCLUSION: The demographic data, medical history, glycemic profile and treatment regimen at baseline in Mainland China subgroup are well balanced. The result of this study will provide the clinical evidence for the use of alogliptin in Chinese T2DM patients.