Rehabilitation After Gluteus Medius and Minimus Treatment.

We reviewed the current literature regarding rehabilitation after gluteus medius and minimus tears as part of a conservative management or postoperative protocol. The greater trochanteric pain syndrome includes a constellation of pathologies that generate pain in the greater trochanteric region and may be accompanied by varying degrees of hip abductor disfunction. It may be related to tendinitis of the gluteus medius and minimus, greater trochanteric bursitis, or even formal tears of the hip abductor tendons. The initial management strategy of the hip abductor tears is conservative, including different anti-inflammatory therapies such as physical therapy and cortisone and platelet-rich plasma injections. The clearest indication for surgical management is failure of conservative management and loss of abductor muscle power. Surgical management has been performed both open and endoscopic with good reported clinical results. More severe tears typically require a more rigid and complex type of fixation. Exorcise intervention seem to improve symptoms after 4 months to a year of therapy therefore a very close supervision of the rehabilitation protocol is mandatory. Gluteus medius and minimus tears are frequent and may be not diagnosed timely. Treatment of these of lesions is based on the knowledge of pathomechanics involved and the extent of injury to the tendon and muscle tissue. Conservative management is based on protecting the hip abductor tendons from excessive tensile and compression stresses while applying progressive load in conjunction with physical and medical anti-inflammatory measures. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative management fails or an abductor power deficit is associated with pain. Similar physical therapy protocols to those used in conservative management are used postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Bone mineral density and low bone mass in severely burned patients: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe burns can alter bone metabolism through different mechanisms. Despite prior published studies describing the association between burns and a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), no clinical guidelines currently exist recommending the systematic evaluation of bone health in patients after severe burns. This study aims to describe the BMD of individuals with severe burn injuries and healthy controls and determine the frequency of low-to-normal bone mass (LNBM) and BMD below the expected range for age (BEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort of patients with either severe thermal or electrical burns and healthy controls paired by gender and age. We performed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at least 90 days after the burn and collected data from each patient's clinical evaluation and clinical file. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients (64 men and 13 women) and their paired controls were included in the study (age [mean ± standard deviation, SD]: 30.37 ± 8.66 years). Patients participated in the study an average of 315 ± 438 days after their burn. The BMD (grs/cm2) in total hip burned vs controls was: 0.998 ± 0.135 vs 1.059 ± 0.12 (p = 0.004); femoral neck 0.876 ± 0.121 vs 0.915 ± 0.097 (p = 0.031), spine 0.977 ± 0.127 vs 1.003 ± 0.076 (p = 0.132).The Z-scores for total hip were - 0.06 ± 1.05 vs 0.41 ± 0.80 (p = 0.002); for neck -0.39 ± 0.89 vs -0.01 ± 0.77 (p = 0.005); and for spine -0.75 ± 1.11 vs -0.32 ± 0.73 (p = 0.005). The proportion of subjects with BMD BEA in burns vs controls was 5.2 vs 1.2% (p = 0.05) in total hip, 3.9 vs 0% (p = 0.045) in the neck, and 18.2 vs 1.2% (p = 0.001) in the spine. The logistic regression model found-in burn patients vs controls-an OR of 9.83 for BMD BEA (CI 95%: 2.17-44.45, p = 003), OR = 4.05 for electrical burns (CI 95%: 1.72-20.89, p = 004) and OR = 15.16 for thermal burns (CI 95%: 2.91-79.00, p = 001). The model also found an OR = 2.48 for LNBM (CI 95%: 1.25-4.93, p = 0.009). The burn variables associated with BMD BEA at any site in the patients were BMI >25 Kg/m2 with an OR = 0.180 (CI 95%: 0.046-0.710, p = 0.014); and the lower limb amputation with an OR = 7.33 (CI 95%; 1.12-48.33, p = 0.038). Five burn patients had a fragility fracture. CONCLUSION: BMD was significantly lower in severely burned patients than in controls, and the proportion BMD BEA cases was significantly higher in the burn patient sample. Severe burns are a strong independent predictor of bone loss, and this risk is maintained for an extended period after the burn.

Disease-related factors associated with exercise adherence in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: Exercise is the most widely-used intervention for reducing bone loss and the incidence of falls and fractures in osteoporosis patients. However, disease-related changes can alter these patients' adherence to exercise programs. This study attempted to describe the factors influencing exercise adherence in a group of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We collected data from each patient's last clinical evaluation, as well as from their clinical file of the previous year. RESULTS: A total of 288 women were included in the study, with an average age of 69.45 (Standard deviation ± 9.2 years). Around a quarter, 76 (26.3%), of the patients did not adhere to exercise, 91 (31.5%) did partially, and 121 (41.9%) did completely. In univariate analysis, the variables significantly associated with exercise adherence were age, height, spine pain intensity, joint pain, and prevalent fracture. In a logistic regression model, pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis and polypharmacy were associated with exercise adherence, while poor balance and hyperkyphosis were associated with non-adherence. CONCLUSION: Pharmacological treatment, polypharmacy, poor balance, and hyperkyphosis all appear to be associated with exercise adherence. As these findings are the significant predictors of exercise engagement, it is necessary to explore balance and postural changes and emphasize the importance of postural and balance training prescription in this group of patients.