Clinical Impact of the Implementation Strategies Used to Apply the 2013 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium or 2018 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, Sleep Disruption Guideline Recommendations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the effectiveness of implementation strategies for ICU execution of recommendations from the 2013 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium (PAD) or 2018 PAD, Immobility, Sleep Disruption (PADIS) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 2012 to August 2023. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020175268). STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if: 1) design was randomized or cohort, 2) adult population evaluated, 3) employed recommendations from greater than or equal to two PAD/PADIS domains, and 4) evaluated greater than or equal to 1 of the following outcome(s): short-term mortality, delirium occurrence, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, or ICU length of stay (LOS). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed articles for eligibility, number of PAD/PADIS domains, quality according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute assessment tools, implementation strategy use (including Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both SAT and SBT; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; Family engagement and empowerment [ABCDEF] bundle) by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) category, and clinical outcomes. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 25 of 243 (10.3%) full-text articles included ( n = 23,215 patients), risk of bias was high in 13 (52%). Most studies were cohort ( n = 22, 88%). A median of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-7) EPOC strategies were used to implement recommendations from two (IQR 2-3) PAD/PADIS domains. Cohort and randomized studies were pooled separately. In the cohort studies, use of EPOC strategies was not associated with a change in mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.9-1.12), or delirium (RR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.03), but was associated with a reduction in MV duration (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.84 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.43) and ICU LOS (WMD -0.77 d; 95% CI, -1.51 to 0.04). For randomized studies, EPOC strategy use was associated with reduced mortality and MV duration but not delirium or ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Using multiple implementation strategies to adopt PAD/PADIS guideline recommendations may reduce mortality, duration of MV, and ICU LOS. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to identify the most effective strategies to implement PAD/PADIS recommendations.

Challenges in Pharmacovigilance: Variability in the Criteria for Determining Drug-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Retrospective, Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Drug-associated acute kidney injury (D-AKI) accounts for 19-26% of acute kidney injury (AKI) events in hospitalized patients and results in outcomes similar to patients with AKI from other etiologies. Diagnosing D-AKI is complex and various criteria have been used. SUMMARY: To highlight the variability in D-AKI determination, a review was conducted between January 2017 and December 2022 using PubMed. Search terms included adaptations of "drug associated kidney injury" to identify a sampling of literature discussing definitions and criteria for D-AKI evaluation. The search yielded 291 articles that were uploaded to Rayyan, a software tool used to screen and select studies. Retrospective, observational electronic health record (EHR) studies conducted in hospitalized patients were included. The final sample contained 16 studies for data extraction, representing mostly adult populations (n = 13, 81.3%) in noncritical or unspecified inpatient settings (n = 12, 75%). Nine studies (56.3%) utilized the recommended Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome guidelines (KDIGO) criteria to define AKI. Baseline creatinine or laboratory criteria for kidney function were provided in 10 studies (62.5%). Eleven studies (68.8%) established a temporal sequence assessment linking nephrotoxin drug exposure to an AKI event, but these criteria were inconsistent among studies using time frames as soon as 3 months prior to AKI. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the substantial variability in D-AKI criteria in select studies. Minimum expectations about what should be reported and criteria for the elements reported are needed to assure transparency, consistency, and standardization of pharmacovigilance strategies.

Pharmacologic Management of Cancer-Related Pain in Pregnant Patients.

Despite being an essential part of whole-person care, patients with cancer often experience complex and under-treated pain. Managing cancer-related pain in patients who are also pregnant compounds the challenge for adequate pain management, as studies have largely excluded this population. Therapy for pain management should be guided by the cause and mechanism of pain. The objective of this review is to provide clinicians with an understanding of pain experienced by pregnant patients with cancer and medications that may be used to help manage cancer-related pain. Nociceptive pain results from damage to somatic or visceral tissues that may be directly caused by cancer. This type of pain can be managed in pregnant patients using acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as first-line agents. In nociceptive pain not managed by non-opioid analgesics, buprenorphine is recommended for those requiring chronic opioids to help manage their pain. Neuropathic pain that results from damage to the peripheral or central nervous system may also be directly caused by cancer, particularly chemotherapy. In pregnant patients, duloxetine and gabapentin should be considered first. Venlafaxine, pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants, and sodium channel blockers should be avoided, if possible. Nociplastic pain is not directly caused by cancer but may be caused by ongoing peripheral nociceptive input or a condition that predates the cancer diagnosis. Duloxetine and gabapentin are reasonable agents to consider for treatment of nociceptive pain in pregnant patients. Cyclobenzaprine may also be helpful for nociplastic pain.

Treatment of Acute Bronchitis and its Impact on Return Emergency Department Visits.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are not recommended in healthy, uncomplicated adults for the treatment of acute bronchitis, yet are still often prescribed. No randomized studies have examined whether prescribing antibiotics in the emergency department (ED) impacts hospital return rates. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare hospital return rates between those who were prescribed an antibiotic vs. those who were not prescribed an antibiotic for the treatment of acute bronchitis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed evaluating patients aged 18-64 years who presented to a community teaching hospital ED with acute bronchitis between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcomes were 30-day ED return and hospital admissions from initial ED visit. The rates of ED return or readmitted were compared for patients prescribed an antibiotic for treatment of acute bronchitis vs. those patients who were not prescribed an antibiotic. RESULTS: Of the 752 patients included, 311 (41%) were prescribed antibiotics. Baseline demographics were similar between both groups. Of those prescribed an antibiotic, 26 of 311 (8.4%) returned to the hospital within 30 days compared with 33 of 441 patients (7.5%) who were not prescribed an antibiotic (odds ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.92). CONCLUSIONS: There was no association found between antibiotic therapy for treatment of acute bronchitis and return to the hospital.