RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial tuberculosis (TBTB) is a common subtype of pulmonary tuberculosis. Concomitant diseases often obscure the diagnosis of senile TBTB. AIM: To characterize senile patients with TBTB and to identify the potential causes of misdiagnosis. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with senile TBTB who were admitted to the Anhui Chest hospital between May 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as diagnosed group (n = 58) and misdiagnosed group (n = 62). Clinical manifestations, laboratory results, radiographic data, and endoscopic findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the misdiagnosed group were most commonly diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis (non-TBTB, 29/62, 46.8%), general pneumonia (9/62, 14.5%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8/62, 12.9%), and tracheobronchial carcinoma (7/62, 11.3%). The time elapsed between disease onset and confirmation of diagnosis was significantly longer in the misdiagnosed group [median (first quartile, third quartile): 6.32 (4.94, 16.02) mo vs 3.73 (2.37, 8.52) mo]. The misdiagnosed group had lower proportion of patients who underwent bronchoscopy [33.87% (21/62) vs 87.93% (51/58)], chest computed tomography (CT) scan [69.35% (43/62) vs 98.28% (57/58)], and those who showed CT signs of tuberculosis [27.91% (12/62) vs 50% (29/58)] as compared to that in the diagnosed group (P < 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to age, gender, occupation, clinical manifestations, or prevalence of comorbid chronic diseases (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Insufficient or inaccurate radiographic or bronchoscopic assessment was the predominant cause of delayed diagnosis of TBTB. Increased implementation and better interpretation of CT scan and early implementation of bronchoscopy can help reduce misdiagnosis of senile TBTB.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND Mediastinal diseases are difficult to diagnose due to diverse origins and complex anatomical structure of the mediastinal tissues. The prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal lesions without pulmonary abnormalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS We divided 100 mediastinal lymphadenectasis patients without pulmonary abnormalities into a VAM group and an EBUS group. The pathological results of each group were regarded as the endpoints. SPSS19.0 statistical software was used. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of VAM were 96%, 97.4%, and 100%, respectively; those of EBUS-TBNA diagnosis were 62%, 87.1%, and 100%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of benign mediastinal lesions between the 2 groups (P<0.01). Compared with the EBUS group (62%), the accuracy in the VAM group was significantly higher (96%) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS We found that the diagnostic accuracy of VAM for mediastinal lymphadenectasis without pulmonary abnormalities is superior to that of EBUS. Therefore, for patients with mediastinal lymphadenectasis or mediastinal mass and without pulmonary abnormalities, mediastinoscopy is recommended as the first choice.
