Fibulin-2: A potential regulator of immune dysfunction after bone trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To reveal the relationship between the fibulin-2 protein and immune dysfunction after bone trauma. METHODS: Individuals who were admitted to the study were divided into a bone trauma group, a recovered from bone trauma group and a volunteer without bone trauma group based on the reason for admission. Fibulin-2 levels in the three groups were compared. Fibulin-2-knockout (fibulin-2-/- ) mice and wild-type (WT) mice were used to detect susceptibility to infection. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemical staining were employed to observe pathological changes in each organ from fibulin-2-/- mice and WT mice. RESULTS: In total, 132 patients were enrolled in this study. The fibulin-2 level in the bone trauma group was lower than that in the recovered bone trauma group (3.39 ± 1.41 vs. 4.30 ± 1.38 ng/mL, t = 2.948, p < .05) and also lower than that in the volunteers without bone trauma group (3.39 ± 1.41 vs. 4.73 ± 1.67 ng/mL, t = 4.135, p < .05). Fibulin-2-/- mice are more prone to infection. Compared with those in WT mice, spleen function and thymus function in fibulin-2-/- mice were impaired. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that compared with those in WT mice, significantly fewer CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD19+ B cells were noted in the spleen and thymus of fibulin-2-/- mice. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma fibulin-2 level was lower in patients with bone trauma. Decreased fibulin-2 is associated with immune dysfunction after bone trauma.

A Clinical Diagnostic Study: Fibulin-2 is a Novel Promising Biomarker for Predicting Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital. As uncontrolled early infection may develop into systemic infection and eventually progress to sepsis, it is important to address infection at an early stage. Furthermore, early detection and prompt diagnosis of infection are the basis of clinical intervention. However, as a result of the interference of complex aetiologies, including fever and trauma, problems regarding the sensitivity and specificity of current diagnostic indices remain, such as for C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil ratio (NEU%), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and D-dimer. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop new biomarkers to diagnose infection. METHODS: From January to October 2021, consecutive patients in the emergency department (ED) were recruited to investigate the feasibility of fibulin-2 as a diagnostic indicator of early infection. Fibulin-2 concentrations in plasma were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The performance of fibulin-2 for predicting infection was analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: We found that the plasma fibulin-2 level was elevated in patients with infection compared with those without infection. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for fibulin-2 was 0.712. For all patients included, the diagnostic ability of fibulin-2 (AUC 0.712) performed as well as CRP (AUC 0.667) and PCT (AUC 0.632), and better than WBC (AUC 0.620), NEU% (AUC 0.619), IL-6 (AUC 0.561) and D-dimer (AUC 0.630). In patients with fever, fibulin-2 performed as well as PCT and better than the other biomarkers in infection diagnosis. In particular, fibulin-2 performed better than all these biomarkers in patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: Fibulin-2 is a novel promising diagnostic biomarker for predicting infection.