Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Wrist Surg ; 12(3): 211-217, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37223388

RESUMO

Background Carpal tunnel release (CTR) may be concomitantly performed along with distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation (DRF ORIF) to prevent carpal tunnel syndrome; however, there is little to no literature investigating the rate, risk factors, and complications associated with CTR. Questions/Purposes The purpose was to determine (1) the rate of CTR performed at time of DRF ORIF, (2) factors associated with CTR, and (3) whether CTR was associated with any complications. Patients and Methods In this case-control study, adult patients who underwent DRF ORIF from 2014 to 2018 were identified from a national surgical database. Two cohorts were analyzed, (1) patients with CTR and (2) patients without CTR. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications were compared with determine factors associated with CTR. Results Of the 18,466 patients, 769 (4.2%) had CTR. Rates of CTR in patients with intra-articular fractures with two or three fragments were significantly higher than the rate of CTR for patients with extra-articular fractures. Underweight patients underwent CTR at a significantly lower rate compared with overweight and obese patients. The American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3 was associated with a higher rate of CTR. Male and older patients were less likely to have CTR. Conclusion The rate of CTR at time of DRF ORIF was 4.2%. Intra-articular fractures with multiple fragments were strongly associated with CTR at time of DRF ORIF, while being underweight, elderly, and male were associated with lower rates of CTR. These findings should be considered when developing clinical guidelines to assess the need for CTR in patients undergoing DRF ORIF. This is a retrospective case control study and reflects level of evidence III.

2.
Hand (N Y) ; 18(2): 328-334, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858223

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) fixation based on location of the radial shaft fracture and risk factors associated with postoperative complications following radial shaft open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: Adult patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF from 2014 to 2018 were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified by fracture location and by the presence or absence of DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared to determine risk factors associated with DRUJ fixation. RESULTS: We identified 1517 patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF, of which 396 (26.1%) underwent DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were similar between cohorts. Distal radioulnar joint fixation was performed in 50 (30.7%) of 163 distal radial shaft fractures, 191 (21.8%) of 875 midshaft fractures, and 3 (13.0%) of 23 proximal shaft fractures (P = .025). Risk factors for patients readmitted include male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 12.76, P = .009) and older age (OR = 4.99, P = .035). Risk factors for patients with any postoperative complication include dependent functional status (OR = 6.78, P = .02), older age (50-69 vs <50) (OR = 2.73, P = .05), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≥3 (OR = 2.45, P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of DRUJ fixation in radial shaft ORIF exceeded previously reported rates of concomitant DRUJ injury, especially among distal radial shaft fractures. More distally located radial shaft fractures are significantly associated with higher rates of DRUJ fixation. Male sex is a risk factor for readmission, whereas dependent functional status, older age, and ASA ≥3 are risk factors for postoperative complications.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Rádio , Fraturas do Punho , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Rádio (Anatomia)/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(4): 211-216, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931687

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with successful union and eradication of infection in the setting of staged procedures to treat obviously infected nonunions of long bones. We hypothesize that patients with positive intraoperative cultures obtained at the time of definitive surgery for infected nonunions are more likely to have persistent nonunion than those with negative cultures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Eight academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent staged management for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, initial fracture management, management of retained implants, number of debridements, grafting, bacteriology, antibiotic course, bone defect management, soft-tissue coverage, and definitive surgery performed were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were treated with staged procedures for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone (mean age 49 years, 60% open fractures, and mean follow-up 22 months). During definitive procedures, 120 patients had intraoperative cultures taken with 43% having positive cultures. For culture-positive patients, 41 patients achieved eventual union and 10 had persistent nonunion. Of 69 culture-negative patients, 66 achieved eventual union and 3 had persistent nonunion. The number of patients with union versus persistent nonunion was statistically significant between culture-positive and culture-negative groups (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Management of infected nonunion in long bones with staged treatments before definitive fixation are beneficial but ultimately less effective when performed in the setting of positive bacterial cultures at the time of definitive management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas , Fraturas não Consolidadas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas Expostas/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas não Consolidadas/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(3): 120-124, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30768531

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of locking hole inserts (LHIs) and their insertion torque on locking plate fatigue life. METHODS: Eighteen standard 3.5-mm locking plates were instrumented with LHIs (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) of 1.70 or 3.96 Nm insertion torque, or without LHIs, whereas eleven 4.5-mm locking plates were instrumented with LHIs at 3.96 Nm insertion torque or without LHIs. Plates were cyclically loaded to failure (ie, plate fracture) in four-point bending. Number of cycles to plate failure were measured. RESULTS: The 3.5-mm plates with 1.70 Nm LHI insertion torque had a 52% increase in cycles to failure compared with plates without LHIs (114,300 ± 23,680 vs. 75,487 ± 15,746 cycles; P = 0.01). Increasing insertion torque to 3.96 Nm led to a further increase of 36% in fatigue life (155,177 ± 32,493 cycles; P = 0.02) and a 106% increase compared with plates without LHIs (P = 0.001). The 4.5-mm plates with 3.96 Nm insertion torque had a 48% increase in cycles to failure when compared with plates without LHIs (74,369 ± 10,181 vs. 50,214 ± 5544 cycles; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LHIs significantly extend plate fatigue length, which would be advantageous in the setting of delayed fracture healing. We recommend the use of LHIs in round locking holes over bony gaps whenever possible; however, we recognize that these findings are limited to implants manufactured by Smith & Nephew.


Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Falha de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Placas Ósseas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Teste de Materiais , Estresse Mecânico , Torque
5.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 4(12): 2325967116676241, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28210648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a popular biologic treatment for musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Despite numerous investigations on the efficacy of PRP therapy, current utilization of this treatment within the United States is not widely known. PURPOSE: To investigate the national utilization of PRP, including the incidence and conditions for which it is used in the clinical setting, and to determine the current charges associated with this treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Using a national database (PearlDiver) of private insurance billing records, we conducted a comprehensive search using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify patients who received PRP injections over a 2-year period (2010-2011). Associated International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes were identified to determine the specific conditions the injection was used to treat. The aggregate patient data were analyzed by yearly quarter, practice setting, geographic region, and demographics. PRP therapy charges were calculated and reported as per-patient average charges (PPACs). RESULTS: A total of 2571 patients who received PRP injections were identified; 51% were male and 75% were older than 35 years. The overall incidence ranged from 5.9 to 7.9 per 1000 patients over the study period. PRP was most commonly administered in hospitals (39%) and ambulatory surgical centers (37%) compared with in private offices (26%). The most common conditions treated were knee meniscus/plica disorders, followed by unspecified shoulder conditions, rotator cuff injuries, epicondylitis, and plantar fasciitis. Further evaluation revealed that 25% of all patients received injections for cartilage-related conditions, 25% meniscus, 25% unspecified, 12% tendon, 8% glenoid labrum, and 5% ligament. The PPAC for PRP treatment was US$1755 per injection. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of consensus regarding PRP indications and efficacy, we observed widespread application of this treatment for a myriad of musculoskeletal injuries. Most treated patients were older than 35 years, and the most commonly treated conditions included cartilage and meniscus disorders. Given the current controversy surrounding this treatment, further studies are necessary to guide clinicians on the value of this therapy for each clinical diagnosis.

6.
Sports Health ; 7(6): 538-41, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26502448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pre- and postoperative rehabilitation are important to the management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but little attention has been given to the costs. This study evaluated the pre- and postoperative rehabilitation charges in patients with ACL reconstruction in the United States. HYPOTHESIS: Patients receive preoperative rehabilitation less commonly than postoperative rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Using the PearlDiver database, we identified patients undergoing ACL reconstruction from 2007 through 2011 using Current Procedural Terminology codes. The associated rehabilitation charges billed to insurance providers for 90 days preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively were categorized as physical therapy or as durable medical equipment (DME). The charges were examined by year and geographic region and represented as per-patient average charges (PPACs). RESULTS: A total of 92,179 patients were identified in the study period. The PPAC for rehabilitation was $241 during the 90-day preoperative period and $1876 for the 6-month postoperative period. Patients averaged 2 preoperative sessions for physical therapy, with 44% of patients receiving preoperative rehabilitation in contrast with an average of 17 postoperative sessions per patient in 93% of patients. Rehabilitation charges were greater postoperatively than preoperatively (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, 24% of patients received a DME, while 35% received a DME postoperatively. Preoperative rehabilitation PPACs were highest in the Northeast, followed by Midwest, South, and West (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative rehabilitation PPACs for geographic region (P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: Preoperative rehabilitation charges were lower than postoperative charges. A patient undergoing ACL reconstruction typically received 9 times more sessions of postoperative physical therapy than preoperative. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study found that preoperative supervised rehabilitation for patients with ACL reconstruction was infrequent across the United States.


Assuntos
Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/reabilitação , Honorários Médicos , Traumatismos do Joelho/reabilitação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Equipamentos Médicos Duráveis/economia , Humanos , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA