Comparison of surgical resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Large primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high mortality rate and a variety of treatments. Surgery and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are important treatments. Which could be better remain debatable. The objective of the study is to compare the long-term overall survival of surgical resection (SR) and the use of TACE in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed clinical trials through PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2022. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses)guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were OS after propensity scores matching (PSM) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies, including 3609 patients, were enrolled in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated a significant improvement in the 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS favoring SR over TACE (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1,60-3.00; OR = 3.47, 95% CI 2.47-4.88; OR = 2.72, 95% CI 2.03-3.64, p < 0.001, random model). The results were consistent across subgroups of tumor size and tumor numbers (p > 0.05). The pooled outcome indicated that 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS after PSM were higher in the SR group than in the TACE group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates that among patients with large primary hepatocellular carcinoma, the overall survival rate of patients undergoing surgical resection was higher than that of patients undergoing TACE.

Lung Ultrasound in Emergency and Critically Ill Patients: Number of Supervised Exams to Reach Basic Competence.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound is increasingly used in critically ill patients as an alternative to bedside chest radiography, but the best training method remains uncertain. This study describes a training curriculum allowing trainees to acquire basic competence. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and educational study was conducted in 10 Intensive Care Units in Brazil, China, France and Uruguay. One hundred residents, respiratory therapists, and critical care physicians without expertise in transthoracic ultrasound (trainees) were trained by 18 experts. The main study objective was to determine the number of supervised exams required to get the basic competence, defined as the trainees' ability to adequately classify lung regions with normal aeration, interstitial-alveolar syndrome, and lung consolidation. An initial 2-h video lecture provided the rationale for image formation and described the ultrasound patterns commonly observed in critically ill and emergency patients. Each trainee performed 25 bedside ultrasound examinations supervised by an expert. The progression in competence was assessed every five supervised examinations. In a new patient, 12 pulmonary regions were independently classified by the trainee and the expert. RESULTS: Progression in competence was derived from the analysis of 7,330 lung regions in 2,562 critically ill and emergency patients. After 25 supervised examinations, 80% of lung regions were adequately classified by trainees. The ultrasound examination mean duration was 8 to 10 min in experts and decreased from 19 to 12 min in trainees (after 5 vs. 25 supervised examinations). The median training duration was 52 (42, 82) days. CONCLUSIONS: A training curriculum including 25 transthoracic ultrasound examinations supervised by an expert provides the basic skills for diagnosing normal lung aeration, interstitial-alveolar syndrome, and consolidation in emergency and critically ill patients.