RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the treatment response, complications and prognosis in mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who underwent stepwise neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) or traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: The medical records of patients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent SCRT or CRT were retrospectively analyzed. Differences in the treatment response, pathologic complete response (pCR), R0 resection, local recurrence, anastomotic leakage, presacral infection, anal preservation, defunctioning stoma, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients who underwent SCRT and CRT were compared. RESULTS: A total of 430 medical records were investigated, including 194 patients in the SCRT group and 236 patients in the CRT group. There was no significant difference in the rates of treatment response, pCR, R0 resection, local recurrence, anastomotic leakage, presacral infection, anal preservation or TEAEs between the two groups. However, the rate of defunctioning stoma in the SCRT group was significantly lower than that in the CRT group (20.1% vs. 44.1%, respectively, Pâ¯<â¯0.01). Moreover, the median OS time of the SCRT and CRT groups was 44.0 and 50.5 months, respectively (Pâ¯=â¯0.17). The median DFS time of the SCRT and CRT groups was 41.0 and 46.8 months, respectively (Pâ¯=â¯0.32). CONCLUSION: Compared with the CRT group, the SCRT group had a similar treatment response, local control and long-term prognosis, and more importantly, a portion of the patients in the SCRT group were exempted from excessive radiation.
