Epidemiological analysis reveals a surge in inflammatory bowel disease among children and adolescents: A global, regional, and national perspective from 1990 to 2019 - insights from the China study.

Background: The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among children and adolescents is rising globally, with substantial variation in levels and trends of disease in different countries and regions, while data on the burden and trends were sparse in children and adolescents. We aimed to assess the trends and geographical differences in children and adolescents aged zero to 19 in 204 countries and territories over the past 30 years. Methods: Data on IBD among children and adolescents was collected from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 database from 1990 to 2019. We used the GBD data and methodologies to describe the change in the burden of IBD among children and adolescents involving prevalence, incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and mortality. Results: Globally, the IBD prevalence cases increased between 1990 and 2019. Annual percentage changes (AAPC) = 0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11-0.19, and incidence cases of IBD increased from 20 897.4 (95% CI = 17 008.6-25 520.2 in 1990 to 25 658.6 (95% CI = 21 268.5-31 075.6) in 2019, representing a 22.78% increase, DALYs cases decreased between 1990 and 2019 (AAPC = -3.02; 95% CI = -3.15 to -2.89), and mortality cases of IBD decreased from 2756.5 (95% CI = 1162.6-4484.9) in 1990 to 1208.0 (95% CI = 802.4-1651.4) in 2019, representing a 56.17% decrease. Decomposition analysis showed that IBD prevalence and incidence increased significantly, and a trend exhibited a decrease in underlying age and population-adjusted IBD DALYs and mortality rates. Correlation analysis showed that countries with high health care quality and access (HAQ) had relatively higher IBD age-standardised prevalence rate (ASPR) and age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR), but lower age-standardised DALYs rate (ASDR) and age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR). Conclusions: Global prevalence and incidence rate of IBD among children and adolescents have been increasing from 1990 to 2019, while the DALYs and mortality have been decreasing. Rising prevalence and rising incidence in areas with historically low rates will have crucial health and economic implications.

Peptic ulcer disease burden, trends, and inequalities in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a population-based study.

Background: Peptic ulcer disease has been a major threat to the world's population, which remains a significant cause of hospitalization worldwide and healthcare resource utilization. Objectives: We aimed to describe the global burden, trends, and inequalities of peptic ulcer disease. Design: An observational study was conducted. Methods: In this secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019, we extracted data for age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), disability-adjusted life year rates (ASDRs), and mortality rates (ASMRs); then, we stratified by age, level of regionals, and country; subsequently, we calculated estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) of ASIR, ASDR, ASMR, and quantified cross-country inequalities in peptic ulcer disease mortality. Results: Globally, ASIR showed a continuous downward trend, from 63.84 in 1990 to 44.26 per 100,000 population in 2019, with an annual decrease of 1.42% [EAPC = -1.42 (95% CI: -1.55 to -1.29)]. ASDR showed a continuing downward trend, and the EAPC was -3.47% (-3.58 to -3.37). ASMR showed a persistent decline, declining by nearly half in 2019 compared to 1990 (3.0 versus 7.39 per 100,000 population), with an annual decrease of 2.55% [EAPC = -3.36 (95% CI: -3.47 to -3.25)]. A significant reduction in sociodemographic index (SDI)-related inequality, from an excess of 190.43 disability-adjusted life years (DALY) per 100,000 (95% CI: -190.83 to -190.02) between the poorest and richest countries in 1990 to 62.85 DALY per 100,000 (95% CI -62.81 to -62.35) in 2019. Conclusion: Global peptic ulcer disease morbidity and mortality rates decreased significantly from 1990 to 2019. These health gains were in accordance with a substantial reduction in the magnitude of SDI-related inequalities across countries, which is paired with overall socioeconomic and health improvements observed in the region.

Polyfluorinated crosslinker-based solid polymer electrolytes for long-cycling 4.5 V lithium metal batteries.

Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), which are favorable to form intimate interfacial contacts with electrodes, are promising electrolyte of choice for long-cycling lithium metal batteries (LMBs). However, typical SPEs with easily oxidized oxygen-bearing polar groups exhibit narrow electrochemical stability window (ESW), making it impractical to increase specific capacity and energy density of SPE based LMBs with charging cut-off voltage of 4.5 V or higher. Here, we apply a polyfluorinated crosslinker to enhance oxidation resistance of SPEs. The crosslinked network facilitates transmission of the inductive electron-withdrawing effect of polyfluorinated segments. As a result, polyfluorinated crosslinked SPE exhibits a wide ESW, and the Li|SPE|LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cell with a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V delivers a high discharge specific capacity of ~164.19 mAh g-1 at 0.5 C and capacity retention of ~90% after 200 cycles. This work opens a direction in developing SPEs for long-cycling high-voltage LMBs by using polyfluorinated crosslinking strategy.

First-in-human phase I study of TQ-B3139 (CT-711) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

BACKGROUND: TQ-B3139 is a novel ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against a broad range of ALK mutations. The aim of this first-in-human phase I trial was to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy of TQ-B3139 in ALK or ROS1 positive advanced NSCLC patients. METHODS: Following a 3 + 3 design, patients received escalating daily dose of TQ-B3139 (50-800 mg) continuously in 28-day cycles. Expansion stage started at dose of 200 mg twice daily (BID). The primary objectives were the safety, dose-limited toxicities (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity. Non-obligatory tumor samples at baseline were collected and sequenced. RESULTS: The study enrolled 63 patients. Fifty-nine (93.4%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), mostly grade 1-2 vomiting (79.3%), diarrhea (76.1%) or nausea (68.2%). 1 (1/6) DLT occurred at 600 mg BID and 1 (1/3) at 800 mg BID. Based on safety and pharmacokinetics data, the RP2D was selected as 600 mg BID. At a dose level ≥200 mg BID, the overall response rate (ORR) was 76.7% (33/43), and the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 25.2 months (95%CI 11.9-NR) for TKI-naive patients. For TKI-treated patients, the ORR was 37.5% (6/16), and the mPFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.6-9.1). The ORR was 66.7% (2/3) in patients with ROS1 fusion at dose level ≥200 mg BID. In patients with measurable brain metastases, the intracranial ORR was 70% (7/10), with median intracranial PFS of 15.9 months. In TKI-treated patients, variant 3 and TP53 alteration were associated with poor PFS. CONCLUSIONS: TQ-B3139 was well-tolerated and exhibited promising anti-tumor activities in patients with ALK and ROS1 positive advanced NSCLC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03099330.

Laser-diode-pumped Tm:SrF2 single crystal for high efficiency CW laser operation at ∼2 µm.

A Tm:SrF2 single crystal is grown by a modified temperature gradient technique (TGT). A study of the fluorescence characteristics and laser performance is carried out. Under laser-diode (LD) end-pumping, a continuous-wave (CW) laser is demonstrated. A slope efficiency of up to 81.8% is first achieved in the Tm-doped single crystals, which is extremely close to the photon quantum efficiency of 2.00. Such a high photon quantum efficiency is caused by the effective cross-relaxation process between Tm3+ ions. A maximum output power of 4.082 W is also obtained. The laser performance indicates that Tm:SrF2 is a promising candidate for highly efficient ∼2 µm lasers.

Utility of comprehensive genomic profiling in directing treatment and improving patient outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the identification of new targetable drivers and the recent emergence of novel targeted drugs, using comprehensive genomic profiling in lieu of the routine testing for classic drivers in the clinical care for advanced NSCLC has been increasingly advocated. However, the key assumption justifying this practice, that comprehensive genomic profiling could lead to effective anticancer therapies and improve patient outcomes, remains unproved. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling was prospectively applied in 1564 advanced NSCLC patients to identify potentially actionable genomic alterations. Patients were assigned to genotype-matched targeted therapies or nonmatched therapies based on the profiling results. Its utility in directing treatments was determined by the proportion of patients receiving genotype-matched targeted therapies and the proportion of patients being enrolled into genotype-matched clinical trials. Its impacts on patient outcomes were assessed by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received a genotype-matched and nonmatched therapy. RESULTS: From October 2016 to October 2019, tumor genomic profiles were established in 1166 patients, leading to a matched targeted therapy in 37.7% (n = 440) and a genotype-matched trial enrollment in 20.9% of patients (n = 244). Potentially actionable alterations were detected in 781 patients (67.0%). For these patients, a genomic profiling-directed matched therapy significantly improved PFS (9.0 months vs 4.9 months, P < 0.001) and OS (3.9 years vs 2.5 years, P < 0.001) compared with a nonmatched therapy. Excluding patients with standard targeted therapies, genomic profiling led to a matched targeted therapy in 16.7% (n = 24) and a matched trial enrollment in 11.2% (n = 16) of patients. No PFS (4.7 months vs 4.6 months, P = 0.530) or OS (1.9 years vs 2.4 years, P = 0.238) benefit was observed with the use of genotype-matched targeted therapies in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive genomic profiling is of clinical utility in assisting treatment selection, facilitating clinical trial enrollment, and improving patient outcomes in advanced NSCLC. However, for patients carrying alterations without standard-of-care targeted drugs, the interpretation of genomic profiling results should be careful given the low likelihood of benefit from the investigational or off-label use of targeted therapies in this population in the current treatment landscape. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900027582 (retrospectively registered on 19 November 2019).

Afatinib as a Potential Therapeutic Option for Patients With NSCLC With EGFR G724S.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR G724S has been described to mediate resistance to first- and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In vitro experiments have provided compelling evidence that G724S retains sensitivity for afatinib. Nevertheless, limited data have reported the clinical efficacy of afatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring G724S mutation. METHODS: We identified 52 patients with NSCLC with EGFR G724S from an inhouse database and comprehensively profiled their concurrent mutation statuses. Treatments and clinical outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: Of 52 G724S-positive patients, 39 harbored concomitant EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del), and all 37 of the 39 patients who had available clinical data were detected with a G724S mutation after receiving EGFR TKIs. A rare variant of 19del E746_S752delinsV co-occurred with G724S the most frequently (n = 29), whereas 7 of 10 patients with concomitant EGFR exon 20 mutation were TKI treatment naive. S768I was the most common mutation in exon 20 (n = 7). One patient harbored a concomitant EGFR exon 21 mutation, and two lacked co-occurring EGFR mutations. A total of 23 patients provided valid clinical outcome data, of whom eight were treated with afatinib after the emergence of G724S, whereas 15 received non-afatinib treatment (alternative EGFR TKI, chemotherapy, or best supportive care). The disease control rate in afatinib-treated patients (n = 8) reached 100% with a median progression-free survival of 4.5 months, significantly longer than that of non-afatinib-treated (n = 15, 1.7 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.32, p = 0.037) and alternative EGFR TKI-treated (n = 11, 1.8 mo, HR = 0.28, p = 0.042) patients. In the subset who had progressed on osimertinib, afatinib also yielded a superior progression-free survival (6.2 mo) than non-afatinib therapies (1.0 mo, HR = 0.04, p = 0.005) and alternative EGFR TKIs (1.8 mo, HR = 0.06, p = 0.033). Analysis of acquired mutations at afatinib progression revealed re-emergence of EGFR T790M or MET amplification as the potential mechanism of afatinib resistance. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR G724S emerges as a resistant mutation against EGFR TKI preferentially in the context of a rare variant of 19del, whereas it might mediate differential mechanisms in the context of exon 20 mutation. We also found that afatinib could be a potential therapeutic option for patients with NSCLC with G724S.

Predictive value of a reduction in the level of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often exhibit chemotherapy-associated changes in serum lipid profiles, however, their prognostic value before and after adjuvant chemotherapy on survival among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is unknown. METHODS: NSCLC patients undergoing radical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy from 2013 to 2017 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Fasted serum lipid levels were measured before and after chemotherapy. The optimal lipid cut-off values at baseline and fluctuation were determined using X-tile™. The fluctuations in serum lipid levels and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. RESULTS: Serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride, apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I, and ApoB all significantly increased after adjuvant chemotherapy. X-tile determined 1.52 mmol/L of HDL-C and 0.74 g/L of ApoB as the optimal cut-off values before chemotherapy. Patients with HDL-C ≥ 1.52 mmol/L (median DFS: not reached vs. 26.30 months, P = 0.0005) and a decreased HDL-C level after adjuvant chemotherapy (median DFS: 80.43 vs. 26.12 months, P = 0.0204) had a longer DFS. An HDL-C level that increased by ≥ 0.32 mmol/L after chemotherapy indicated a worse DFS. A high baseline ApoB level were associated with a superior DFS. In the univariate analysis and the multivariate Cox analyses, a high baseline HDL-C level and a HDL-C reduction after adjuvant chemotherapy were independent indicators for superior DFS. High baseline HDL-C was related to N0-1 stage (χ2 = 6.413, P = 0.011), and HDL-C fluctuation was significantly correlated with specific chemotherapy regimens (χ2 = 5.002, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy increased various lipid levels in resected NSCLC patients. A higher HDL-C level before chemotherapy and a reduced HDL-C level after adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of longer DFS in patients with curable NSCLC.

Gemcitabine and APG-1252, a novel small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2/BCL-XL, display a synergistic antitumor effect in nasopharyngeal carcinoma through the JAK-2/STAT3/MCL-1 signaling pathway.

Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has a poor prognosis, with an unfavorable response to palliative chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there are few effective therapeutic regimens. Therefore, we require novel treatment strategies with enhanced efficacy. The present study aimed to investigate the antitumor efficacy of APG-1252-M1, a dual inhibitor of BCL-2/BCL-XL, as a single agent and combined with gemcitabine. We applied various apoptotic assays and used subcutaneous transplanted NPC model to assess the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. Moreover, phospho-tyrosine kinase array was used to investigate the combined therapy's potential synergistic mechanism. In addition, further validation was performed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. In vitro, we observed that APG-1252-M1 had moderate antitumor activity toward NPC cells; however, it markedly improved gemcitabine's ability to promote NPC cell apoptosis and suppress invasion, migration, and proliferation. Specifically, APG-1252 plus gemcitabine exhibited even remarkable antitumor activity in vivo. Mechanistically, the drug combination synergistically suppressed NPC by activating caspase-dependent pathways, blocking the phospho (p)-JAK-2/STAT3/MCL-1 signaling pathway, and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In conclusion, the results indicated that the combination of APG-1252 and gemcitabine has synergistic anticancer activities against NPC, providing a promising treatment modality for patients with NPC.

Anticancer bispecific antibody R&D advances: a study focusing on research trend worldwide and in China.

BACKGROUND: The bispecific antibody (bsAbs) research around the world has undergone great changes. We analyzed the global trend of bsAbs research and compared the differences in clinical research of bsAbs between China and worldwide. METHODS: BsAbs research clinical trials information was retrieved through the online open-resource clinical trial registration platform. Research information including organizations, identity numbers, locations, phases, participating centers, conditions, status, enrollment, targets, spectrums of mechanism of action (MOA), and start date was collected. Clinical trials were divided into two categories based on the attributes of pharmaceutical companies (international or China-initiated or involved). RESULTS: From 1997 to 2020, 272 clinical trials regarding bsAbs research were retrieved. Twenty-nine percent of the studies were contributed by companies from Chinese institutions, which followed the USA and ranked second. The clinical trials of bsAbs are mainly concentrated on phase I (n = 161), phase I/II (n = 54), and phase II (n = 51), and the number of phase III trials is still rare (n = 4). Tumor species distribution analysis shows that there are significantly higher focuses on gastric cancer (n = 18), esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer (n = 16), bladder cancer (n = 10), biliary malignant tumor (n = 8), nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 6), and thymic cancer (n = 2) in China. BsAbs target and spectrums of MOA analysis showed that international companies mainly focus on bsAbs with CD3-based (n = 63) target with MOA of T-cell redirection, while researches in China pay more attention to PD-1 (n = 9)/PD-L1 (n = 7) axises with MOA of double immune checkpoint blocking. CONCLUSION: Global bsAbs research increased rapidly during the 1997 to 2020 period. The developed countries in America and Europe are leading the trend of bsAbs research. Anticancer bsAbs clinical research in China is booming and chasing after the world trend.

Apatinib Plus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: The Phase III ACTIVE Study (CTONG1706).

INTRODUCTION: Blocking vascular endothelial growth factor pathway can enhance the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. ACTIVE is the first phase 3 study conducted in the People's Republic of China evaluating apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus gefitinib as first-line therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation were randomized 1:1 to receive oral gefitinib (250 mg/d), plus apatinib (500 mg/d; apatinib [A] + gefitinib [G] group), or placebo (placebo [P] + gefitinib [G] group). Stratification factors were mutation type, sex, and performance status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiology review committee (IRRC). Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival, quality of life (QoL), safety, etc. Next-generation sequencing was used to explore efficacy predictors and acquired resistance. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients were assigned to the A + G (n = 157) or P + G group (n = 156). Median IRRC PFS in the A + G group was 13.7 months versus 10.2 months in the P + G group (hazard ratio 0.71, p = 0.0189). Investigator- and IRRC-assessed PFS were similar. Overall survival was immature. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 were hypertension (46.5%) and proteinuria (17.8%) in the A + G group and increased alanine aminotransferase (10.4%) and aspartate aminotransferase (3.2%) in the P + G group. QoL in the two groups had no statistical differences. Post hoc analysis revealed PFS benefits tended to favor the A + G group in patients with TP53 exon 8 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib + gefitinib as first-line therapy had superior PFS in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC versus placebo + gefitinib. Combination therapy brought more adverse events but did not interfere QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02824458.

Cholesterol synthesis disruption combined with a molecule-targeted drug is a promising metabolic therapy for EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Acquired resistance is a challenge for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Here, we propose a novel treatment strategy based on recent lipid metabolism work. METHODS: We applied a variety of experimental methods such as immunoblotting, MTT, si-RNA, and animal models, to demonstrate the relationship between EGFR and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and the effects of statin monotherapy, and TKI monotherapy, and their combination on cell proliferation at the cell level and animal level. RESULTS: LDLR has a positive correlation with EGFR, EGFR signaling upregulates LDLR expression through the SREBP-1 dependent pathway, EGFR mutation cells count on lipids to survive and grow. Combined with a molecule-targeted drug, atorvastatin not only enhances the treatment effect in vitro, but also mitigates the growth of NSCLC in vivo. In this animal experiment, the combination medicine (atorvastatin with TKI) has a better tumor suppression effect on NSCLC. In HCC827 cell line, the average tumor shrinkage is about 68% in Gefitinib group, and about 49% in atorvastatin group, but about 89% in combination group. In H1975 cell line, the average tumor shrinkage is about 18% in Osimertinib group, and about 8% in atorvastatin group, but about 44% in combination group. CONCLUSIONS: the combination of an EGFR-TKI and a statin for EGFR mutant NSCLC may be a novel tumor inhibiting treatment.

Mendelian randomization study indicates lack of causal relationship between physical activity and lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous researches have indicated physical activity (PA) may be associated with lower risk of lung cancer. However, causal relationship between PA and risk of lung cancer is not clear. We aimed to inspect the causal effect of PA on lung cancer. METHODS: We analyzed summary data of accelerator-measured PA and lung cancer from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. We obtained summary data of accelerator-measured PA from UK Biobank, data of lung cancer patients from Consortium and International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) to investigate possible causal effect of PA on lung cancer. RESULTS: According to result of MR using inverse variance weighted method (IVW), we found that genetically predicted higher PA level did not causally decrease risk of lung cancer (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.03, p = 0.238). Results of MR-Egger and weighted median method were consistent with IVW method. CONCLUSION: Our mendelian randomization study showed that genetically higher PA is not causally associated with risk of lung cancer. More researches are needed to investigate relationship between PA and lung cancer.

The perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and cancer patients: an observational study in China.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been widely accepted in western countries. However, limited attention has been given to PROs in China due to a lack of research on the agreement between doctors' and patients' reports of adverse events. This study aims to reveal the perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and cancer patients in China. METHODS: An observational study was administered at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). Totally, 200 adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy participated. Patient reports were collected by nurses via telephone. Doctor reports were collected by nurses based on their medical records. The agreement between doctors and patients was analyzed by Cohen's κ. RESULTS: Agreement between doctors and patients varied among different symptoms: 0.26 for nausea/vomiting, 0.49 for constipation, 0.63 for diarrhea, 0.65 for general pain, and 0.76 for rash. Doctors' underreporting rates were 70% for nausea/vomiting, 50% for diarrhea, 38% for rash, 33% for constipation, and 29% for general pain. CONCLUSIONS: The perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and patients exists in China, especially regarding subjective symptoms. Introduction of PROs in both clinical trials and routine clinical practice should be considered in China.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Erlotinib 100 mg/d vs. Gefitinib 250 mg/d in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (E100VG250): An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study.

Background: Erlotinib-based combination therapy leads to increased efficacy but also toxicity for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Reducing the dose of erlotinib could improve treatment tolerability, but few evidences are available regarding its efficacy at reduced dose. This randomized phase-2 study intends to compare the efficacy and tolerability between lower dose erlotinib (100 mg/d) and standard dose gefitinib (250 mg/d) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 100 mg/d or gefitinib 250 mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Results: Between April 2013 and September 2018, 171 patients were randomized to receive erlotinib (n = 85) and gefitinib (n = 86); 74 in the erlotinib group and 83 in the gefitinib group were include in analysis. DCR with erlotinib and gefitinib were 91% [95% CI 81.7-95.3] and 93% [85.1-96.6], respectively (P = 0.613). Response rate was 62% [50.8-72.4] in the erlotinib group and 53% [42.4-63.4] in the gefitinib group (P = 0.247). No significant difference was observed between erlotinib and gefitinib in median progression-free survival [10.1 vs. 11.3 months, HR = 1.295 [0.893-1.879], P = 0.171] and median overall survival [26.6 vs. 28.7 months, HR = 0.999 [0.637-1.569], P = 0.998]. Subgroup analyses by line of treatment, EGFR subtypes and status of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis found similar results. More toxicity [any-grade, 80 [96%] vs. 66 [89]; grade 3-4, 11 [13%] vs. 4 [5%]] and toxicity-related discontinuation [10 [12%] vs. 3 [4%]] occurred with gefitinib compared with erlotinib. But no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: Lower dose erlotinib (100 mg/d) achieved comparable efficacy compared with standard dose gefitinib (250 mg/d) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01955421.

Comparison of First-Line Treatments for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Importance: Combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy or bevacizumab in first-line treatments of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been evaluated in various clinical trials. However, it remains unclear what the optimal combination regimen is. Objective: To clarify which first-line combination regimen is associated with the best tumor response among patients with ES-SCLC. Data Sources: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to extract eligible literature from database inception to December 2019. Study Selection: Head-to-head randomized clinical trials on first-line treatments for patients with ES-SCLC were included with outcomes and toxic effects reported, including objective response rate (ORR, involving complete response and partial response), disease control rate (DCR, involving complete response, partial response, and stable disease), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of grades 3 to 5. Of 199 eligible articles, 14 were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were independently extracted and collected by 2 reviewers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were OS, PFS, DCR, ORR, and TRAEs of grades 3 to 5. Results: A total of 3 phase 2 and 11 phase 3 randomized clinical trials involving 4838 patients were included. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) plus etoposide-based chemotherapy, compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone, showed the most favorable OS (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80) and the best DCR (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81). Bevacizumab plus etoposide-based chemotherapy provided the best PFS compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.27), although this was not translated into OS benefit. The addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to etoposide-platinum chemotherapy caused no more toxic effects in general (compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31), while bevacizumab plus etoposide-platinum regimen induced the most TRAEs grades 3 to 5 among all first-line treatments (eg, compared with irinotecan-platinum regimen: OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.26-14.57). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve value, PD-L1 inhibitor plus etoposide-platinum had the highest probability of being ranked first for OS (0.87) and DCR (0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review and network meta-analysis suggest that the combination of a PD-L1 inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) and etoposide-based chemotherapy may be an optimal first-line treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC patients.

Immune-related pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically revolutionized lung cancer treatment, providing unprecedented clinical benefits. However, immune-related pneumonitis (IRP) caused by ICIs has aroused widespread concern due to its high rate of discontinuation and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the risks of IRP among different regimens for advanced lung cancer. METHODS: Phase II and III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were searched from electronic databases. The rates of grade 1-5 IRP and grade 3-5 IRP were systematically extracted. An NMA was conducted among chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy, dual ICIs combination, and ICIs+chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis was also compared based on specific types of ICIs. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs involving 17,310 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with chemotherapy, ICI-based regimens were associated with an increased risk of grade 1-5 IRP and grade 3-5 IRP. Compared with ICIs+chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy (grade 1-5: OR 2.14, 95% credible interval 1.12 to 4.80; grade 3-5: 3.03, 1.491 to 6.69) and dual ICIs combination (grade 1-5: 3.86, 1.69 to 9.89; grade 3-5: 5.12, 2.01 to 13.68) were associated with a higher risk of grade 1-5 IRP and grade 3-5 IRP. No significant difference was found between dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy in grade 1-5 IRP (1.85, 0.91 to 3.37) or in grade 3-5 IRP (1.65, 0.81 to 3.37). Besides, compared with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (2.56, 1.12 to 6.60), a lower risk of grade 1-5 IRP was observed in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Compared with chemotherapy, using ICIs is associated with an increased risk of IRP. ICIs+chemotherapy is associated with a lower risk of IRP compared with dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of 1-5 grade IRP compared with PD-L1 inhibitors.