Palopegteriparatide Treatment Improves Renal Function in Adults with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: 1-Year Results from the Phase 3 PaTHway Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with chronic hypoparathyroidism managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium) have an increased risk for renal dysfunction versus age- and sex-matched controls. Treatments that replace the physiologic effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) while reducing the need for conventional therapy may help prevent a decline in renal function in this population. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of palopegteriparatide treatment on renal function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism. METHODS: PaTHway is a phase 3 trial of palopegteriparatide in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism that included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 26-week period followed by an ongoing 156-week open-label extension (OLE) period. Changes in renal function over 52 weeks (26 weeks blinded + 26 weeks OLE) were assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A subgroup analysis was performed with participants stratified by baseline eGFR < 60 or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: At week 52, over 95% (78/82) of participants remained enrolled in the OLE and of those, 86% maintained normocalcemia and 95% achieved independence from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤ 600 mg/day of calcium), with none requiring active vitamin D. Treatment with palopegteriparatide over 52 weeks resulted in a mean (SD) increase in eGFR of 9.3 (11.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline (P < 0.0001) and 43% of participants had an increase ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2. In participants with baseline eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide resulted in a mean (SD) increase of 11.5 (11.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). One case of nephrolithiasis was reported for a participant in the placebo group during blinded treatment; none were reported through week 52 with palopegteriparatide. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis of the PaTHway trial, palopegteriparatide treatment was associated with significantly improved eGFR at week 52 in addition to previously reported maintenance and normalization of serum and urine biochemistries. Further investigation of palopegteriparatide for the preservation of renal function in hypoparathyroidism is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04701203.

Chronic hypoparathyroidism is caused by inadequate parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Hypoparathyroidism is managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium), but over time the disease itself and conventional therapy can increase the risk of medical complications including kidney problems. This study looked at how a new treatment for chronic hypoparathyroidism, palopegteriparatide (approved in the European Union under the brand name YORVIPATH^®), affects kidney function in adults in the PaTHway clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive palopegteriparatide or a placebo injection once daily along with conventional therapy. For both groups, clinicians used a protocol to eliminate conventional therapy while maintaining normal blood calcium levels. After 26 weeks, participants on placebo switched to palopegteriparatide. Ninety-five percent of participants were still enrolled in the PaTHway trial after 52 weeks. Of those, 86% had normal blood calcium levels and 95% did not need conventional therapy (not taking vitamin D and not taking therapeutic doses of calcium [> 600 mg/day]). After 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide, significant improvements were seen in a measure of kidney function called estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Improvements in eGFR from the beginning of the trial to week 52 were considered clinically meaningful for over 57% of participants. In participants with impaired kidney function at the beginning of the trial, eGFR improvements were even greater, and 74% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement. These results suggest that palopegteriparatide treatment may be beneficial for kidney function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, especially those with impaired kidney function.

Role of patient specific 3D printed models in patient confidence, understanding and satisfaction of care in Singapore.

Introduction: Patient specific 3D models have been widely used for pre-op planning and intra-op guidance in orthopaedic surgery. These models however are not often used in pre-operative doctor-patient communication. This study evaluates the roles of customized 3D models in improving patient understanding, confidence, and satisfaction of patient care when they were used during preoperative counselling. Materials and methods: A prospective survey was conducted on 33 orthopaedic trauma patients who were required to rate on a scale of 1-5, the effectiveness of patient specific 3D models in: 1) improving patient's understanding and, 2) helping patients cope with the condition, 3) boosting patients' confidence in the treatment and 4) in the surgeon; and on a scale of 0-10, their overall satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was done to compare ratings of patients by age and by education levels. Results: Over 90% patients rated agree or strongly agree on customised 3D models' effectiveness in improving understanding of injury and boosting confidence in treatments and surgeons. 87% patients agreed or strongly agreed that the models enhanced patient self-efficacy. No significant correlation was identified between age and patients' perceived effectiveness of customised 3D models in improving patient care. Ratings on four areas evaluated by pre-secondary and post-secondary groups were comparable. Post-secondary group had significantly higher satisfaction level than the pre-secondary group. Conclusion: Customized 3D models help patients visualise complex pathology to facilitate patients' understanding of their condition and treatment, resulting in improved self-efficacy, confidence, and overall satisfaction. The use of patient specific 3D models in pre-operative counselling allows greater patient involvement therefore prompting patient-centred healthcare. Age does not influence patients' perceived effectiveness of customised 3D models in improving patient care. Patients with higher education level are likely to experience higher satisfaction level due to their willingness to take responsibility for their care.

Derivation of a Risk Score (REVEAL-ECHO) Based on Echocardiographic Parameters of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric risk assessment tools determine mortality risk in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) by combining invasive and noninvasive variables so management strategies can be tailored to individuals. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a risk score based on common echocardiographic parameters risk-stratify patients with PAH? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) echocardiographic risk score (REVEAL-ECHO) was derived using retrospective echocardiographic data from 2,400 adult patients with PAH enrolled in the REVEAL registry database. A stepwise Cox regression model identified echocardiographic parameters significantly predictive of survival. Values were assigned to each selected parameter based on survival at 12 months' follow-up (Kaplan-Meier estimates). The REVEAL-ECHO risk score was the sum of individual values. Patients were categorized as having low, intermediate, or high risk based on Kaplan-Meier-predicted 12-month survival. RESULTS: The risk score included four echocardiographic parameters-right ventricular (RV) chamber enlargement, reduced RV systolic function, tricuspid regurgitation severity, and pericardial effusion-and accounted for PAH etiology. Higher REVEAL-ECHO risk scores signaled lower probability of 12-month survival. Statistically significant separation of mortality risk was observed among the risk strata: intermediate vs low (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.17-1.75; P = .0004) and high vs low (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.19-3.10; P < .0001). Augmentation of the REVEAL Lite 2 risk calculator with REVEAL-ECHO risk scores achieved separation of REVEAL Lite 2 into four risk groups and identified a subgroup of patients with a low REVEAL Lite 2 risk score who were at higher risk (intermediate-low risk) and a subgroup of patients with an intermediate REVEAL Lite 2 risk score who also were at higher risk (intermediate-high risk). INTERPRETATION: A REVEAL-ECHO risk score, derived using four echocardiographic parameters, may discriminate risk further when used as an adjunct to current risk assessment scores. Further validation is required.

Smoking history and pulmonary arterial hypertension: Demographics, onset, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence and its association with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outcomes have not been described in patients in the United States. METHODS: Using the US-based Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), the prevalence, demographics, and outcomes in ever- versus never-smokers with PAH were determined. RESULTS: Ever-smoking status was more prevalent in males (61.7%) than in females (42.9%) enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smokers were older than never-smokers at the time of PAH diagnosis and REVEAL enrollment. The time to first hospitalization, transplant-free survival, and survival did not differ between ever- and never-smokers overall; however, in newly diagnosed males, ever-smoking was associated with earlier death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.0; p = 0.0199), the composite of transplant or death (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6; p = 0.0008), and first hospitalization (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7; p = 0.0063), though smoking exposure (pack-years) did not differ between newly and previously diagnosed males. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL PAH data demonstrate that smoking prevalence in male PAH patients is disproportionate. The prevalence of cigarette smoking was significantly higher in males than females enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smoking status was associated with increased age at PAH diagnosis and, in newly diagnosed male PAH patients, earlier time to hospitalization and shorter survival after PAH diagnosis.

Patient and disease characteristics of the first 500 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from SPHERE.

BACKGROUND: Selexipag is a selective oral prostacyclin receptor agonist indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry (SPHERE) (NCT03278002) is collecting data from selexipag-treated patients in real-world clinical practice to elucidate and describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and dosing/titration regimens of patients treated with selexipag in routine clinical practice. METHODS: SPHERE is a United States (US)-based, ongoing, multicenter, prospective observational study (target N = 800). This study enrolls patients who are either newly initiated on selexipag (≤60 days before enrollment) or were previously receiving selexipag with documentation of dose titration at study enrollment. Data collection for the study occurs at routine clinic visits. In this paper, we report on the first 500 patients enrolled. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 17.8 months; 77.6% of patients completed the planned 18 months follow-up, and 22.4% discontinued early from the study. At diagnosis, 94.8% of patients had PAH (World Health Organization [WHO] Group 1), most commonly idiopathic (49.2%) and connective tissue disease associated (26.4%). Most patients (72.4%) initiated selexipag more than 60 days before enrollment. At initiation, 31.0% of patients had WHO functional class (FC) II disease, and 49.6% had WHO FC II or III disease. In addition, 55.0% of patients were receiving double therapy (most commonly an endothelin receptor antagonist plus phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor [42.3%]), whereas 30.6% were receiving monotherapy. Despite most patients already receiving PAH-specific therapy, at selexipag initiation, 67.2% (336 of 500) were at intermediate risk, and 9.6% (48 of 500) were at high risk of 1-year mortality. Risk scores remained stable in ∼55% of patients and improved in ∼20% at the end of the study. In total, 72.2% of patients had at least 1 adverse event (AE), and 37.6% reported a serious AE. The median selexipag maintenance dose was 1,200 µg twice daily (interquartile range: 800-1,600 µg twice daily). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world, US-based patients with PAH initiating selexipag typically have WHO FC II/III disease and are at intermediate risk, despite receiving PAH-specific treatment. Selexipag was prescribed as part of a combination regimen in most patients. The study identified no unexpected adverse effects.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Treatment Era: Meta-Analyses of Randomized, Controlled Trials and Observational Registries.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the magnitude of benefit of modern therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated PAH are limited. In this study, we performed meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and registries to quantify the benefit of these modern therapies in patients with CTD-PAH. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles reporting data from RCTs or registries published between January 1, 2000 and November 25, 2019. Eligibility criteria included multicenter studies with ≥30 CTD-PAH patients. For an RCT to be included, the trial had to evaluate an approved PAH therapy, and long-term risks of clinical morbidity and mortality or 6-minute walk distance had to be reported. For a registry to be included, survival rates had to be reported. Random-effects models were used to pool the data. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (total of 4,329 patients; 1,267 with CTD-PAH) and 19 registries (total of 9,739 patients; 4,008 with CTD-PAH) were included. Investigational therapy resulted in a 36% reduction in the risk of clinical morbidity/mortality events both in the overall PAH population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.54, 0.75; P < 0.001) and in CTD-PAH patients (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51, 0.81; P < 0.001) as compared to control subjects. The survival rate was lower in CTD-PAH patients compared to all PAH patients (survival rate 62%, 95% CI 57, 67% versus 72%, 95% CI 69, 75% at 3 years). The survival rate in CTD-PAH patients treated primarily after 2010 was higher than that in CTD-PAH patients treated before 2010 (survival rate 73%, 95% CI 62, 81% versus 65%, 95% CI 59, 71% at 3 years). CONCLUSION: Modern therapy provides a similar reduction in morbidity/mortality risk in patients with CTD-PAH when compared to the PAH population overall. Risk of death is higher in CTD-PAH patients than in those with PAH overall, but survival has improved in the last 10 years, which may be related to increased screening and/or new treatment approaches. Early detection of PAH in patients with CTD and up-front intensive treatment are warranted.

Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Achievement of low-risk status is a treatment goal in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Risk assessment often is performed using multiparameter tools, such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator. Risk calculators that assess fewer variables without compromising validity may expedite risk assessment in the routine clinic setting. We describe the development and validation of REVEAL Lite 2, an abridged version of REVEAL 2.0. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a simplified version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk assessment calculator for patients with PAH be developed and validated? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: REVEAL Lite 2 includes six noninvasive variables-functional class (FC), vital signs (systolic BP [SBP] and heart rate), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and renal insufficiency (by estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR])-and was validated in a series of analyses (Kaplan-Meier, concordance index, Cox proportional hazard model, and multivariate analysis). RESULTS: REVEAL Lite 2 approximates REVEAL 2.0 at discriminating low, intermediate, and high risk for 1-year mortality in patients in the REVEAL registry. The model indicated that the most highly predictive REVEAL Lite 2 parameter was BNP/NT-proBNP, followed by 6MWD and FC. Even if multiple, less predictive variables (heart rate, SBP, eGFR) were missing, REVEAL Lite 2 still discriminated among risk groups. INTERPRETATION: REVEAL Lite 2, an abridged version of REVEAL 2.0, provides a simplified method of risk assessment that can be implemented routinely in daily clinical practice. REVEAL Lite 2 is a robust tool that provides discrimination among patients at low, intermediate, and high risk of 1-year mortality. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Long-term outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension by functional class: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational registries.

Limited data about the long-term prognosis and response to therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with World Health Organization functional class I/II symptoms are available. PubMed and Embase were searched for publications of observational registries and randomized, controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients published between January 2001 and January 2018. Eligible registries enrolled pulmonary arterial hypertension patients ≥18 years, N > 30, and reported survival by functional class. Randomized, controlled trial inclusion criteria were pulmonary arterial hypertension patients ≥18 years, ≥6 months of treatment, and morbidity, mortality, or time to worsening as end points reported by functional class. The primary outcomes were survival for registries and clinical event rates for randomized, controlled trials. Separate random effects models were calculated for registries and randomized, controlled trials. Four randomized, controlled trials (n = 2482) and 10 registries (n = 6580) were included. Registries enrolled 9%-47% functional class I/II patients (the vast majority being functional class II) with various pulmonary arterial hypertension etiologies. Survival rates for functional class I/II patients at one, two, and three years were 93% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91%-95%), 86% (95% CI: 82%-89%), and 78% (95% CI: 73%-83%), respectively. The hazard ratio for the treatment effect in randomized, controlled trials overall was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.74) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44-0.82) for functional class I/II patients and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.78) for functional class III/IV. The calculated risk of death of 22% within three years for functional class I/II patients underlines the need for careful assessment and optimal treatment of patients with functional class I/II disease. The randomized, controlled trial analysis demonstrates that current medical therapies have a beneficial treatment effect in this population.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire: feasibility of utilizing one-day versus seven-day symptom reporting.

Patient-reported outcomes are important measures to include in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials but are not widely utilized in clinical practice. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is the only pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific patient-reported outcomes instrument developed and validated in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes development. The PAH-SYMPACT tool measures pulmonary arterial hypertension-related symptoms and impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on daily life. Symptoms are reported each day for seven consecutive days, and the impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension over one week is recalled and reported on day 7; however, daily symptom reporting may overburden patients and healthcare resources, limiting the practicality of PAH-SYMPACT outside of clinical trials. To determine the practicability of an abridged version of PAH-SYMPACT for which all reporting is completed on one day, symptom data from the SYMPHONY trial (NCT01841762; PAH-SYMPACT validation study) were retrospectively analyzed to assess whether symptoms reported on each day correlated with the weekly average and whether one-day symptom scores were sensitive to disease severity. Correlation coefficients comparing the weekly average and individual day symptom scores were mostly high or very high regardless of the day they were measured. Findings were similar when using either Spearman's rank correlation or weighted kappa method. One-day symptom scores differentiated well between World Health Organization functional classes II and III/IV pulmonary arterial hypertension and were sensitive to change in disease severity as measured by the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity. These data suggest that the one-day PAH-SYMPACT is feasible and appropriate for routine implementation in clinical practice.

Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension using Bayesian analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification tools in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are limited in their discriminatory abilities, partly due to the assumption that prognostic clinical variables have an independent and linear relationship to clinical outcomes. We sought to demonstrate the utility of Bayesian network-based machine learning in enhancing the predictive ability of an existing state-of-the-art risk stratification tool, REVEAL 2.0. METHODS: We derived a tree-augmented naïve Bayes model (titled PHORA) to predict 1-year survival in PAH patients included in the REVEAL registry, using the same variables and cut-points found in REVEAL 2.0. PHORA models were validated internally (within the REVEAL registry) and externally (in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries). Patients were classified as low-, intermediate- and high-risk (<5%, 5-20% and >10% 12-month mortality, respectively) based on the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines. RESULTS: PHORA had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 for predicting 1-year survival, which was an improvement over REVEAL 2.0 (AUC 0.76). When validated in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries, PHORA demonstrated an AUC of 0.74 and 0.80, respectively. 1-year survival rates predicted by PHORA were greater for patients with lower risk scores and poorer for those with higher risk scores (p<0.001), with excellent separation between low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups in all three registries. CONCLUSION: Our Bayesian network-derived risk prediction model, PHORA, demonstrated an improvement in discrimination over existing models. This is reflective of the ability of Bayesian network-based models to account for the interrelationships between clinical variables on outcome, and tolerance to missing data elements when calculating predictions.

Impact of race on survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from the REVEAL registry.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has suggested that the prevalence and outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may vary by race or ethnicity. However, these studies have been limited by small sample size or methodological techniques relying on epidemiologic data. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between race/ethnicity and survival in a large U.S.-based prospective multicenter registry. METHODS: Patients in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational study of Group 1 PAH, were categorized by race/ethnicity. Baseline hemodynamic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and medication use was described. The relationship between race/ethnicity and outcome was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling techniques. Left-truncation analysis, which adjusted for time from diagnosis to study enrollment, was used to minimize the effect of survivor bias. RESULTS: This analysis included 3,046 patients; 2,202 identified as white, 393 as black, 263 as Hispanic, 100 as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 88 as other. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that white patients had the lowest survival rates. After adjusting for variables of prognostic impact, race/ethnicity was no longer significantly associated with survival. Other results showed that black patients were more likely to have connective tissue disease-associated PAH, Hispanic patients were more likely to have portopulmonary hypertension, and Asian patients were more likely to have congenital heart disease-associated PAH. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the REVEAL registry did not find race/ethnicity to be a significant predictor of mortality. This is the largest analysis to date evaluating the role of race/ethnicity on outcomes in PAH.

Use of supplemental oxygen in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in REVEAL.

BACKGROUND: Supplemental low-flow oxygen is recommended by treatment guidelines as supportive therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based largely on expert opinion. Reduced diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide (DLCO) is associated with increased mortality in PAH. Reduced DLCO is also associated with relative hypoxemia, making the effects of supplemental oxygen use of particular interest in this sub-population. METHODS: Patients in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational study of Group 1 PAH, were categorized by presence or absence of supplemental oxygen use and by degree of DLCO reduction. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated by group. RESULTS: Of 3,046 patients, 57% used supplemental oxygen and 43% did not. Supplemental oxygen users had worse prognostic factors and more PAH-specific medication use. Of the 424 patients with severe DLCO reduction (<40% of predicted), 76% used oxygen and 24% did not. Patients with severe DLCO reduction who used supplemental oxygen had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality than those who did not (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.83; p = 0.0033). This was true for newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed patients. There was no relationship between oxygen use and outcomes in patients with no, mild, or moderate DLCO reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, the risk of death was significantly lower for patients with severe DLCO reduction who received supplemental oxygen compared with those who did not. A randomized trial is warranted to further investigate the relationship between supplemental oxygen use and outcomes in PAH.

Baseline and Serial Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level Predicts 5-Year Overall Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Data From the REVEAL Registry.

BACKGROUND: Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level is a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Its impact on long-term overall survival (OS) was investigated in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational, multicenter, US registry of patients with PAH. METHODS: Patients were ≥ 18 years of age, met right heart catheterization criteria at rest, had World Health Organization group I PAH, and had BNP measurement at enrollment. Optimal BNP threshold was obtained via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. OS was compared in patients with low (≤ 340 pg/mL) vs high (> 340 pg/mL) BNP at baseline; changes between baseline and last assessment were also examined. Patients were categorized based on baseline (low or high) and follow-up (low or high) BNP values; hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated and compared using Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 1,426 patients were analyzed. Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with baseline high vs low BNP (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 3.0-4.2). BNP change analysis at ≤ 1 year postenrollment demonstrated that the low-low group had the lowest and the high-high group had the highest 5-year mortality risk (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.19-0.27). Changes in BNP score also correlated with change of risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline BNP threshold of 340 pg/mL strongly predicted survival up to 5 years in patients with PAH. A BNP reduction at 1 year since enrollment was associated with decreased mortality risk, whereas an increase in BNP at 1 year was associated with an increased mortality risk, supporting BNP as a surrogate marker of PAH survival.

Impact of declining renal function on outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A REVEAL registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is associated with abnormal cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, in-hospital death and poor survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and thus it may be a prognostic biomarker. In our analysis we assess the relationship between change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and outcomes in PAH patients in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL). METHODS: Overall 2,368 patients were classified into chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages based on baseline eGFR: normal or Stages 1 or 2 (n = 1,699); Stage 3a (n = 399); Stage 3b (n = 196); and Stages 4 or 5 (n = 74). We evaluated the relationship between baseline CKD stage and survival, as well as the composite end-point of survival and freedom from all-cause hospitalization. The relationships between change in eGFR at ≥1 year and these clinical end-points were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with a ≥10% decline in eGFR from baseline over ≥1 year had a significantly increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1.66; p < 0.0001) and the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death (hazard ratio 1.33; p = 0.002). This decline predicted survival independently of changes in 6-minute walk distance and functional class. However, a ≥10% increase in eGFR was not significantly associated with either end-point. CONCLUSION: In REVEAL, a ≥10% decline in eGFR over ≥1 year independently predicted poorer survival. Thus, eGFR may be a simple and economical biomarker in PAH.

Prolonged survival in patients with breast cancer and a history of brain metastases: results of a preplanned subgroup analysis from the randomized phase III BEACON trial.

PURPOSE: Conventional chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BCBM). Etirinotecan pegol (EP), a novel long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, was designed using advanced polymer technology to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels. METHODS: The phase 3 BEACON trial enrolled 852 women with heavily pretreated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer between 2011 and 2013. BEACON compared EP with treatment of physician's choice (TPC; eribulin, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, or docetaxel) in patients previously treated with anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine, including those with treated, stable brain metastases. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was assessed in a pre-defined subgroup of BCBM patients; an exploratory post hoc analysis adjusting for the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) index was also conducted. RESULTS: In the trial, 67 BCBM patients were randomized (EP, n = 36; TPC, n = 31). Treatment subgroups were balanced for baseline characteristics and GPA indices. EP was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.51; P < 0.01) versus TPC; median OS was 10.0 and 4.8 months, respectively. Improvement in OS was observed in both poorer and better GPA prognostic groups. Survival rates at 12 months were 44.4% for EP versus 19.4% for TPC. Consistent with the overall BEACON population, fewer patients on EP experienced grade ≥3 toxicity (50 vs. 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The significant improvement in survival in BCBM patients provides encouraging data for EP in this difficult-to-treat subgroup of patients. A phase three trial of EP in BCBM patients is underway (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02915744).

Health-related quality of life in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer treated with etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice: Results from the randomised phase III BEACON trial.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) enhances understanding of treatment effects that impact clinical decision-making. Although the primary end-point was not achieved, the BEACON (BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102) trial established etirinotecan pegol, a long-acting topoisomerase-1 (TOP1) inhibitor, as a promising therapeutic for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) achieving clinically meaningful benefits in median overall survival (OS) for patients with stable brain metastases, with liver metastases or ≥ 2 sites of metastatic disease compared to treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Reported herein are the findings from the preplanned secondary end-point of HRQoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL, assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) (version 3.0) supplemented by the breast cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23), was evaluated post randomisation in 733 of 852 patients with either anthracycline-, taxane- and capecitabine-pretreated locally recurrent or MBC randomised to etirinotecan pegol (n = 378; 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (q3wk)) or single-agent TPC (n = 355). Patients completed assessments at screening, every 8 weeks (q8wk) during treatment, and end-of-treatment. Changes from baseline were analysed, and the proportions of patients achieving differences (≥5 points) in HRQoL scores were compared. RESULTS: Differences were seen favouring etirinotecan pegol up to 32 weeks for global health status (GHS) and physical functioning scales (P < 0.02); numerical improvement was reported in other functional scales. The findings from HRQoL symptom scales were consistent with adverse event profiles; etirinotecan pegol was associated with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms whereas TPC was associated with worsened dyspnoea and other systemic side-effects. Analysis of GHS and physical functioning at disease progression showed a decline in HRQoL in both treatment arms, with a mean change from baseline of -9.4 and -10.8 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was evidence of benefit associated with etirinotecan pegol compared with current standard of care agents in multiple HRQoL measurements, including global health status and physical functioning, despite worse gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. diarrhoea). Patients in both arms had a decline in HRQoL at disease progression. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01492101.

Safety and tolerability of etirinotecan pegol in advanced breast cancer: analysis of the randomized, phase 3 BEACON trial.

PURPOSE: New treatments with novel mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities are needed for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor with a unique toxicity profile. The randomized phase 3 BEACON study that compared EP to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) demonstrated its clinical activity. We now present detailed safety data from the BEACON trial. METHODS: Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received at least two prior cytotoxic regimens for advanced disease were randomized to EP or TPC. Prior treatment with an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine was required. The frequencies of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were evaluated for the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. RESULTS: A total of 831 patients were evaluated (n = 425, EP; n = 406, TPC). Compared with TPC, EP was associated with a slightly higher median relative dose intensity (98.3 vs. 92.8 %, respectively) and significantly fewer grade ≥3 toxicities (48.0 vs. 63.1 %, P < 0.0001). The most commonly reported grade ≥3 toxicities in the EP arm were diarrhea (9.6 %) and neutropenia (9.6 %) and in the TPC arm, neutropenia (30.8 %). Median time to onset of grade ≥3 diarrhea was delayed with EP relative to TPC (43 vs. 7 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The differentiated mechanism of action of EP resulted in a safety profile that is substantially distinguished from that of current widely used therapies for the treatment of women with advanced breast cancer.

Etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) versus treatment of physician's choice in women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (BEACON): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: New options are needed for patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor that prolongs exposure to, but reduces the toxicity of, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan). We assessed whether etirinotecan pegol is superior to currently available treatments for patients with previously treated, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study (BEACON; BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102), conducted at 135 sites in 11 countries, patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (and two to five previous regimens for advanced disease) were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally via an interactive response system to etirinotecan pegol (145 mg/m(2) as a 90-min intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) or single-drug treatment of physician's choice. Patients with stable brain metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. Randomisation was stratified with a permuted block scheme by region, previous eribulin, and receptor status. After randomisation, patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01492101. FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2011, and Aug 20, 2013, 852 patients were randomly assigned; 429 to etirinotecan pegol and 423 to treatment of physician's choice. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median 12·4 months [95% CI 11·0-13·6] for the etirinotecan pegol group vs 10·3 months [9·0-11·3] for the treatment of physician's choice group; hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·75-1·02]; p=0·084). The safety population includes the 831 patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment (425 assigned to etirinotecan pegol and 406 to treatment of physician's choice). Serious adverse events were recorded for 128 (30%) patients treated with etirinotecan pegol and 129 (32%) treated with treatment of physician's choice. Fewer patients in the etirinotecan pegol group had grade 3 or worse toxicity than those in the treatment of physician's choice group (204 [48%] vs 256 [63%]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (41 [10%] in the experimental group vs five [1%] in the control group), neutropenia (41 [10%] vs 125 [31%]), and peripheral neuropathy (two [<1%] vs 15 [4%]). Three patients in the etirinotecan pegol group died of treatment-related adverse events (pneumonia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute renal failure) and two in the treatment of physician's choice group (neutropenic sepsis and septic shock). INTERPRETATION: This trial did not demonstrate an improvement in overall survival for etirinotecan pegol compared to treatment of physician's choice in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. The toxicity profile noted in the etirinotecan pegol group differed from that in the control group. In view of the frequency of cross-resistance and overlapping toxicities noted with many available drugs and the need for effective drugs in highly refractory disease, etirinotecan pegol may warrant further research in some subgroups of patients. FUNDING: Nektar Therapeutics.