RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of administration of dexmedetomidine in anaesthesia for esophageal cancer operation. METHODS: 100 patients (ASAI-II) who were undergoing to esophageal cancer operation were randomly divided into control group (group A) and dexmedetomidine group (group B) (n = 50). The scheme of induction and maintenance of aesthesia of the two groups were identical. Patients in group B administered dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 microg/kg over 10 min and patients in group A were given a placebo infusion of normal saline. Patients in group B administered dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.4 microg/(kg x h) was injected and stoped at 30 min by the end of operation. Mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were detected before induction (T0), induction (T1), 1 min after extubation (T2), 5 min after extubation (T3) and 10 min after extubation (T4) Propofol comsumption, fentanlyl comsumption, and side effects were recorded as well. RESULTS: The results showed that MAP and HR (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4) in group B were significantly different from those in group A which fluctuated more markedly (P < 0.05). Propofol comsumption in group A was much more than that in group B (P < 0.05). Incidence of pharynx and larynx ache and restlessness were higher in group A than those in group B (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine could effectively reduce the cardiovascular response to incubation and extubation in esophageal cancer operation patients. Propofol comsumption, fentanlyl comsumption and side effects were reduceed as well.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Anestésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propofol/administração & dosagemRESUMO
AIM: To explore effects of intrathecal injection of U0126 on morphine withdrawal response and the spinal Phospho-CREB expression in morphine-induced withdrawal rats. METHODS: All the rats were divided into 5 groups: control group, dependence group, withdrawal group, U0126 group (5 microg, it) and DMSO group. Morphine withdrawal score, touch evoked agitation scores(TEA score), immunohistochemical and Western-blotting technique were used to evaluate morphine withdrawal response and the expression of Phospho-CREB in the spinal cord. RESULTS: Intrathecal injection of MEK inhibitor U0126 significantly alleviated morphine withdrawal symptoms. Morphine withdrawal scores in U0126 group (22.5 +/- 4.09) were significantly lower than that of withdrawal group (28.6 +/- 4.89, P < 0.05). TEA score of withdrawal group was 13.5 +/- 2.55, which was significantly higher than that of U0126 group (10.0 +/- 2.76, P < 0.05). Phospho-CREB positive neurons in the spinal dorsal horn of withdrawal group were 380 +/- 71, which is higher than that of U0126 group (293 +/- 47, P < 0.05). Compared with withdrawal group, level of Phospho-CREB protein detected by Western blot in spinal cord of U0126 group was significantly lower. CONCLUSION: MEK inhibitors U0126 could suppress expression of Phospho-CREB in the spinal cord.