[Spatial Distribution of Soil Heavy Metals and Regional Control Strategies in China at Province Level].

It is important to understand the spatial distribution characteristics and health risks of soil heavy metals for the implementation of soil pollution control measures in different levels and regions. Based on the data of 706 core studies in the last 20 years, the spatial distribution characteristics, accumulation degree, and health risks of soil heavy metals in China were analyzed at the provincial level. The results showed that the soil heavy metals had obvious spatial differences on the provincial scale, with an overall trend of "high in the south and low in the north and high in the east and low in the west." The content of heavy metals in the soil of agricultural land and construction land was high, and the rate of exceeding the standard was higher than that of other land types. Soil heavy metal concentrations in most areas of China were higher than the regional background values and were highly cumulative. The accumulation indices were:Cd(1.80)>Pb(0.23)>Cu(0.17)>Zn(-0.05)>As(-0.56)>Cr(-0.69), with more than 85% of the provincial soils reaching moderate levels of Cd pollution. Non-ferrous metal resource-based provinces such as Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Hunan, and Jiangxi generally had higher soil heavy metal levels than those in other provinces, and local children faced higher cancer risks. Soil pollution in coastal areas such as Fujian, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Tianjin mainly originated from industrial production and urbanization construction. High intensity agricultural utilization was an important cause of soil heavy metal accumulation in Henan, Shandong, and Anhui.

[The effects of aranidipine on ambulatory blood pressures in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of aranidipine enteric-coated capsules on 24 h blood pressure and blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: This was an open clinical trial with 2 weeks of placebo run-in period. A total of 74 patients with blood pressure (140-180/95-110 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) were treated by aranidipine (5 mg/d) for 4 weeks.If clinical sitting blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg at 4th week, aranidipine at 5 mg/d would be continued for another 8 weeks.If not, the dosage would be increased to 10 mg/d.If blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg at 8th week, aranidipine at 5 mg/d or 10 mg/d would be given constantly.If not, the dosage would be increased to 20 mg/d and given for another 4 weeks. All patients performed 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before and after the treatment with BPV evaluated by the average 24 h per unit time blood pressure standard deviation and morning blood pressure surge (MBPS). RESULTS: (1) After 12 weeks' treatment with aranidipine, the mean 24 h blood pressure was reduced significantly compared with the baseline [(14 ± 13)/(11 ± 9) mm Hg, both P < 0.05] with trough/peak (T/P) ratio of SBP and DBP in responders of 75.31% and 78.15%, respectively.(2) After 12 weeks' treatment, standard deviations of 24 h, daytime SBP/DBP and nighttime SBP/DBP were reduced significantly[(25 ± 3)/(14 ± 4) mm Hg vs (11 ± 3)/(8 ± 2) mm Hg, (24 ± 5)/(14 ± 4) mm Hg vs (11 ± 3)/(8 ± 2) mm Hg, (10 ± 3)/(8 ± 4) mm Hg vs (8 ± 3)/(6 ± 3) mm Hg], respectively with all P < 0.05.Significant decrease was shown in MBPS compared to the baseline [(27 ± 11) mm Hg vs (19 ± 9) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. (3) The incidence of adverse events was 13.4%, including mild dizziness, flushing and palpitation. CONCLUSION: Administration of aranidipine enteric-coated capsules can control 24 h blood pressure effectively and reduce BPV significantly in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension with good safety profile.

[Efficacy and safety of aranidipine in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of aranidipine versus retard-released felodipine in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active antihypertensive drug parallel-controlled study. After 2 weeks of placebo run-in period, 315 patients at 6 centers with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 to 109 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) while systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 180 mm Hg were randomized to receive aranidipine 5-20 mg/d (n = 126) or retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d (n = 126) for 12 weeks. Others (n = 63) received placebo for 4 weeks. Their blood pressures were evaluated at baseline and the end of Weeks 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: After a 12-week treatment, SBP decreased from 148.8 ± 10.7 mm Hg to (132.8 ± 11.2) mm Hg while DBP dropped from ( 98.4 ± 2.8) mm Hg to (83.9 ± 7.5) mm Hg. There were significant differences with the baseline values (P < 0.0001). After a 4-week treatment, the reductions of SBP in aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups were (12.1 ± 11.0) mm Hg and (12.2 ± 11.2) mm Hg while the reductions of DBP in two groups (11.8 ± 6.9) mm Hg and (12.1 ± 7.9) mm Hg respectively. The reductions of SBP and DBP in two groups were (2.3 ± 8.4) mm Hg and (4.0 ± 5.1) mm Hg and they were significantly superior to that in placebo group (P < 0.0001). But no significant difference existed between aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups. Also no significant differences were found between these two antihypertensive therapy groups at the end of Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the reduction of blood pressure, total response rate and blood pressure control rate. But 20 mg daily aranidipine was significantly superior to 10 mg daily retard-released felodipine in the control rates of SBP and DBP. Adverse events occurred at 24.22% and 29.92% in aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups respectively (P = 0.305). CONCLUSION: Administration of aranidipine 5-20 mg/d can effectively control blood pressure and is not inferior to retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d. The efficacy of 20 mg/d aranidipine is superior to that of retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d. And the effectiveness and safety of aranidipine are similar to those of retard-released felodipine.