M6A-mediated hsa_circ_0061179 inhibits DNA damage in ovarian cancer cells via miR-143-3p/TIMELESS.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is among the most common and deadly solid malignancies in women. Despite many advances in OC research, the incidence of OC continues to rise, and its pathogenesis remains largely unknown. Herein, we elucidated the function of hsa_circ_0061179 in OC. The levels of hsa_circ_0061179, miR-143-3p, TIMELESS, and DNA damage repair-related proteins in OC or normal ovarian tissues and cells were measured using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting. The biological effects of hsa_circ_0061179 and miR-143-3p on proliferation, clone formation, DNA damage, and apoptosis of OC cells were detected by the cell counting kit-8 assay, 5-methylethyl-2'-deoxyuridine, flow cytometry, the comet assay, and immunofluorescence staining combined with the confocal microscopy. The interaction among hsa_circ_0061179, miR-143-3p, and TIMELESS was validated by the luciferase reporter assay. Mice tumor xenograft models were used to evaluate the influence of hsa_circ_0061179 on OC growth in vivo. We found that human OC biospecimens expressed higher levels of hsa_circ_0061179 and lower levels of miR-143-3p. Hsa_circ_0061179 was found to bind with miR-143-3p, which directly targets TIMELESS. Hsa_circ_0061179 knockdown or miR-143-3p overexpression suppressed the proliferation and clone formation of OC cells and increased DNA damage and apoptosis of OC cells via the miR-143-3p/TIMELESS axis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that METTL3 could direct the formation of has_circ_0061179 through a specific m6A modification site. YTHDC1 facilitated the cytoplasmic transfer of has_circ_0061179 by directly binding to the modified m6A site. Our findings suggest that hsa_circ_0061179 acts as the sponge of miR-143-3p to activate TIMELESS signaling and inhibits DNA damage and apoptosis in OC cells.

The Association Between Modified Albumin-Bilirubin (mALBI) and Survival in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical value of the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade in predicting the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) from January 2020 to May 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), treatment response, and the association between different mALBI grades and survival. RESULTS: In these 67 patients, 85.1% (57/67) were male, and the median age was 63 years. The patients with mALBI grades 1 and 2a at baseline had a median OS of 12.83 months (95% CI: 9.4 to 16.27 months), whereas it was 3.2 months (95% CI: NA to 11.59 months) for patients with mALBI grades 2b and 3. The OS for patients with dynamic mALBI grades 1 and 2a was 13.27 months (95% CI: 8.72 to 17.81 months), significantly longer than five months (95% CI: 2.47 to 7.53 months) for dynamic mALBI grades 2b and 3 patients (p<0.01).  Conclusion: In conclusion, mALBI grade may be a potential dynamic biomarker for predicting the prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.

Effects of LINC00261 targeting miR-148a/WNT10b axis on the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells.

Objective: Colorectal cancer remains a significant challenge with high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of targeting the microRNA-148a/WNT10b axis with the long non-coding RNA LINC00261 on the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Methods: In vitro, small interfering RNA-LINC00261 and microRNA-148 inhibitor sequences were synthesized and transfected into SW480 cells. The study groups included a control group, small interfering RNA negative control group, small interfering RNA group, small interfering RNA negative control + microRNA -inhibitor group, small interfering RNA + microRNA -inhibitor group, and small interfering RNA + microRNA-negative control group. The transfection efficiency and expression levels of LINC00261 and miR-148a were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, and protein expression levels of WNT10b and ß-catenin were evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, flow cytometry, and Western blot, respectively. Results: After small interfering RNA-LINC00261 transfection, a significant decrease in cell proliferation (p < 0.05) and an increase in apoptosis (p < 0.05) were observed, accompanied by cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. Inhibition of LINC00261 by small interfering RNA resulted in increased microRNA-148a expression and decreased protein expression of WNT10b and ß-catenin. However, the small interfering RNA + microRNA inhibitor group showed significantly increased levels of WNT10b and ß-catenin protein expression. Conclusions: These results suggest that silencing of long non-coding RNA LINC00261 could potentially affect the proliferation of SW480 cells by regulating the micro RNA -148a/WNT10b axis.

Baseline Albumin-Bilirubin grade as a predictor of response and outcome of regorafenib therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of regorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is widespread. Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) has been shown to be a potential prognostic marker for regorafenib treatment, but its prognostic value remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the value of the baseline ALBI grade in predicting the efficacy and survival outcomes of HCC patients after regorafenib treatment. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, and Vip Database were searched from January 2010 to October 2022. Studies treating HCC patients with regorafenib and with ALBI as a categorical variable, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcome indicators were included. After applying Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included studies, Review Manager 5.4 was used to statistically analyze. Chi-square Q test and I2 statistics were used to detect heterogeneity. Funnel plot asymmetry, Egger's and Begg's test were used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, comprising 1,918 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were all evaluated as high quality. Compared to the high-grade baseline ALBI group, patients in the low-grade group had a longer survival time after receiving regorafenib and also more suitable for regorafenib treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 6.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.22-18.96, P < 0.01]. The low-grade baseline ALBI group before sorafenib treatment was significantly correlated with better OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.68-3.31, P < 0.00001] and PFS (HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.16-2.08, P = 0.003). Likewise, the low-grade baseline ALBI group before regorafenib was also significantly correlated with better OS (HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.13, P = 0.005) and PFS (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11, P = 0.0005). In addition, the ALBI grade was significantly correlated with disease control rate (DCR) (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.45-5.79, P = 0.003), but not the objective response rate (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.71-5.46, P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: The baseline ALBI grade could be a valuable prognostic indicator for predicting response and outcomes in HCC patients treated with regorafenib.

The safety and efficacy of immunotherapy and palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.

OBJECTIVE: Whether palliative RT (pRT) can influence the prognosis of mNSCLC patients who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still under debate. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pRT plus ICIs in mNSCLC patients. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched, and only prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. All data were analyzed with Stata 14.0 and Review Manager Version 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included. The combined ORRs for the ICIs group, cRT plus ICIs group, and SBRT plus ICIs group were 0.22 (95% CI: 1.27, 4.04), 0.26 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.49), and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.40), respectively. And PFS were 2.21 (95% CI: 1.71, 2.70), 4.63 (95% CI: 2.16, 7.09), and 7.38 (95% CI: 2.16, 12.60) months, respectively. OS was 5.96 (95% CI: 3.85, 8.07), 9.04 (95% CI: 6.49, 11.59), and 7.96 (95% CI: 4.02, 11.91) months for the above groups, respectively. For safety terms, patients receiving ICIs plus SBRT had an incidence of 5% (95% CI: 2%, 9%) for pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Patients with mNSCLC may benefit from the combination of ICIs and pRT therapy, but these findings need further validation.

Assessing the Relationship Between Liver Metastases and the Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: It is not well determined whether liver metastasis is a prognostic factor for survival of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the efficacy of ICIs in patients with NSCLC with or without liver metastases, aiming to evaluate the impact of liver metastasis on survival of NSCLC. METHODS: We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of ICIs in the treatment of NSCLC patients with or without liver metastases. The duration of this search was from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2022. The reviewers screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessment, and used RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 14 to perform analyses. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs were included, published from 2019 to 2022. For NSCLC patients with liver metastases, the risk of disease progression decreased by 36% (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55-0.75; P < .01) when treated with ICIs, and the death risk (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94; P < .01) was also reduced after ICIs treatment. For those without liver metastases, they had significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.52-0.60; P < .01) and OS (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.67-0.80; P < .01), compared to those of the control group. Subgroup analysis of OS in liver metastases patients suggested that OS benefit was associated with treatment strategy (for anti-PD-L1 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, HR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.81-1.34; P =.75). CONCLUSION: For NSCLC patients with or without liver metastases, ICIs administration could improve both PFS and OS, especially for those without liver metastases. More RCTs are essential to verify these findings.

Assessing Potential Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Radiation in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Recent evidence suggests that combining radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may result in better outcomes. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ICI plus radiation versus ICI alone and explored potential factors affecting its efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: The databases including PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve eligible studies comparing the efficacy and safety outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients after ICIs ± RT treatments. We performed subgroup analyses to identify potential prognostic factors from radiation details and study types. The odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events were used to represent the outcome effects. Results: 26 eligible studies with 14192 cases were included. The results showed that the ORR (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.93; p = 0.02) and DCR (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.82; p < 0.01) of RT + ICIs groups were significantly higher than those of the ICIs alone group. The median PFS and OS for ICIs versus RT + ICIs were 2.2 versus 4.4 months and 9.0 versus 13.4 months, respectively. Patients in the ICIs plus RT group had a significantly better PFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.81; p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.83; p < 0.01) when compared to those in the ICIs group. In terms of adverse events, the risk of pneumonia was not significantly increased in patients treated with both ICIs and RT when compared to ICIs group alone (risk ratio = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.44; p = 0.63). The correlation analysis found that PFS was significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis results showed that significant improvements in OS were observed in non-palliative RT group (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.65; p < 0.01) and extracranial RT group (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.83; p < 0.01). RT type could also be a prognostic factor associated with the OS (for conventional RT: HR = 0.68 and p = 0.22; for stereotactic body radiation therapy: HR = 0.77 and p < 0.01). However, concerning RT timing, the results showed a similar trend in reducing mortality risk (for previous RT: HR = 0.64 and p = 0.21; for concurrent RT: HR = 0.35 and p = 0.16). Conclusion: RT plus ICIs is associated with improved survival for advanced NSCLC patients, especially for those with non-palliative RT. Further clinical trials are needed to validate its effect on survival outcomes.

The prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein in metastatic colorectal cancer using regorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The application of regorafenib has changed the landscape of subsequent-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), as two of the most common inflammatory factors, are suggested to be potential prognostic factors for mCRC patients treated with regorafenib, but the results are conflicting. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of NLR and CRP in mCRC patients treated with regorafenib. Methods: We searched online databases such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane library up to April 2022, without language limitation, to identify clinical studies evaluating the prognostic role of NLR or CRP in regorafenib treated mCRC patients. The main endpoints were hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The associations between NLR, CRP, and the above endpoints were extracted. Review Manager 5.4 was used to conduct the combined analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied for assessing the quality of included studies. Heterogeneity was detected by chi-square-based Q test and I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's test. Results: Eight studies involving 1,287 cases were included, with 5 reporting survival outcomes based on NLR level and 4 reporting survival according to CRP level. The results of meta-analysis showed that the calculated HR of OS for subsequent-line regorafenib in mCRC patients with high versus low NLR was 2.52 [I2=52%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.75-3.64; P<0.00001]. The combined HR of PFS with high versus low baseline NLR was 2.11 (I2=12%, 95% CI: 1.80-2.48; P<0.00001). For patients with a high level of CRP, the OS was significantly shorter when compared with patients with a low level of CRP (I2=0%, HR =1.88; 95% CI: 1.55-2.29; P<0.00001). Conclusions: High level of NLR could be associated with OS in mCRC patients treated with regorafenib. It is suggested that the impact of regorafenib on OS may vary according to the baseline NLR.

Potential predictors for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) trials. However, the correlations between early endpoints, such as progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) are unclear. In this study, the correlations between OS and other early endpoints were evaluated in HCC patients who received ICI. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase were searched to October 2020. Clinical studies evaluating efficacy and outcomes of HCC patients treated with ICI were included. ORR, DCR, PFS and OS were extracted from individual studies. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression model were used to assess the correlation. RESULTS: 74 studies involving 9001 HCC cases were included. For HCC patients treated with ICI, the pooled ORR and DCR were 16% (95% CI: 14-18%) and 52% (95% CI: 47-57%), and the median PFS and OS were 3.75 (95% CI: 2.88-4.90) months, and 13.20 (95% CI: 11.88-14.82) months, retrospectively. The correlation between ORR, DCR, PFS and OS were 0.35 (R2 = 0.21, p < 0.05), 0.43 (R2 = 0.18, p < 0.05), and 0.50 (R2 = 0.33, p < 0.05), respectively. Further, the association between PFS and OS of the combination strategy showed a better correlation (rs = 0.79, R2 = 0.75, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PFS could be potential surrogates for OS, especially PFS for patients who treated with ICI combination regimen.