Functional lung imaging in thoracic tumor radiotherapy: Application and progress.

Radiotherapy plays an irreplaceable and unique role in treating thoracic tumors, but the occurrence of radiation-induced lung injury has limited the increase in tumor target doses and has influenced patients' quality of life. However, the introduction of functional lung imaging has been incorporating functional lungs into radiotherapy planning. The design of the functional lung protection plan, while meeting the target dose requirements and dose limitations of the organs at risk (OARs), minimizes the radiation dose to the functional lung, thus reducing the occurrence of radiation-induced lung injury. In this manuscript, we mainly reviewed the lung ventilation or/and perfusion functional imaging modalities, application, and progress, as well as the results based on the functional lung protection planning in thoracic tumors. In addition, we also discussed the problems that should be explored and further studied in the practical application based on functional lung radiotherapy planning.

Different functional lung-sparing strategies and radiotherapy techniques for patients with esophageal cancer.

Background: Integration of 4D-CT ventilation function images into esophageal cancer radiation treatment planning aimed to assess dosimetric differences between different functional lung (FL) protection strategies and radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A total of 15 patients with esophageal cancer who had 4D-CT scans were included. Lung ventilation function images based on Jacobian values were obtained by deformation image registration and ventilation imaging algorithm. Several different plans were designed for each patient: clinical treatment planning (non-sparing planning), the same beam distribution to FL-sparing planning, three fixed-beams FL-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning (5F-IMRT, 7F-IMRT, 9F-IMRT), and two FL-sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning [1F-VMAT (1-Arc), 2F-VMAT (2-Arc)]. The dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared and focused on dosimetric differences in FL. Results: The FL-sparing planning compared with the non-sparing planning significantly decreased the FL-Dmean, V5-30 and Lungs-Dmean, V10-30 (Vx: volume of receiving ≥X Gy), although it slightly compromised PTV conformability and increased Heart-V40 (P< 0.05). The 5F-IMRT had the lowest PTV-conformability index (CI) but had a lower Lungs and Heart irradiation dose compared with those of the 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT (P< 0.05). The 2F-VMAT had higher PTV-homogeneity index (HI) and reduced irradiation dose to FL, Lungs, and Heart compared to those of the 1F-VMAT planning (P< 0.05). The 2F-VMAT had higher PTV conformability and homogeneity and decreased FL-Dmean, V5-20 and Lungs-Dmean, V5-10 but correspondingly increased spinal cord-Dmean compared with those of the 5F-IMRT planning (P< 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, 4D-CT ventilation function image-based FL-sparing planning for esophageal cancer can effectively reduce the dose of the FL. The 2F-VMAT planning is better than the 5F-IMRT planning in reducing the dose of FL.

Functional Liver Imaging in Radiotherapy for Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Backgrounds: Functional liver imaging can identify functional liver distribution heterogeneity and integrate it into radiotherapy planning. The feasibility and clinical benefit of functional liver-sparing radiotherapy planning are currently unknown. Methods: A comprehensive search of several primary databases was performed to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric and clinical benefits of functional liver-sparing planning radiotherapy. Secondary objectives were to assess the ability of functional imaging to predict the risk of radiation-induced liver toxicity (RILT), and the dose-response relationship after radiotherapy. Results: A total of 20 publications were enrolled in descriptive tables and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found that mean functional liver dose (f-MLD) was reduced by 1.0 Gy [95%CI: (-0.13, 2.13)], standard mean differences (SMD) of functional liver volume receiving ≥20 Gy (fV20) decreased by 0.25 [95%CI: (-0.14, 0.65)] when planning was optimized to sparing functional liver (P >0.05). Seven clinical prospective studies reported functional liver-sparing planning-guided radiotherapy leads to a low incidence of RILD, and the single rate meta-analysis showed that the RILD (defined as CTP score increase ≥2) incidence was 0.04 [95%CI: (0.00, 0.11), P <0.05]. Four studies showed that functional liver imaging had a higher value to predict RILT than conventional anatomical CT. Four studies established dose-response relationships in functional liver imaging after radiotherapy. Conclusion: Although functional imaging modalities and definitions are heterogeneous between studies, but incorporation into radiotherapy procedures for liver cancer patients may provide clinical benefits. Further validation in randomized clinical trials will be required in the future.