Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 23(3): 89, 2022 Mar 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345256

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Although injury of myocardium after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported, the mechanism and effect of exogenous phosphocreatine (PCr) supplementation on the injury are yet to be elucidated. Biomarkers, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and variations in white blood cells for inflammation, and serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) for myocardial injury are examined. METHODS: A total of 105 patients undergoing PCI were included and randomly divided into two groups: control (treated with routine hydration therapy) and PCr (treated with additional intravenous infusion of exogenous PCr). The serum levels of biomarkers were detected at administration and 4, 12, 24, and 48 h after PCI, with natural logarithmic (loge) transformation of data when modeling assumptions were not fulfilled. RESULTS: The level of loge-transformed IL-6 increased in both groups, especially at 12 and 24 h after the operation, and that of PCr group was less than the control group at 48 h. The content of loge-transformed cTnI was significantly increased in both groups, while that of the PCr group was markedly lower than the control group at all time points after PCI. Moreover, the ratio of neutrophils was elevated at all time points after PCI, while that of the PCr group was lower at 48 h, and the variations in the ratio of lymphocytes showed opposite results. CONCLUSIONS: Exogenous phosphocreatine reduces stent implantation, triggers inflammation manifested as decreased serum levels of IL-6 and the aggregation of neutrophils, and protects the myocardium of the patients undergoing PCI. These findings provided the potential mechanism and treatment for myocardial injury associated with PCI.


Assuntos
Inflamação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Fosfocreatina , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Inflamação/prevenção & controle , Interleucina-6 , Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fosfocreatina/uso terapêutico , Troponina I
2.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(132): 1154-8, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26158180

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) and their clinicopathological and prognostic value in gastric cancer (GC). METHODOLOGY: The expression of VEGF and SSTR in 107 cases of GC tissue and 30 cases of gastric mucosa were detected by immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathological and prognostic association of VEGF and SSTR in GC was analyzed RESULTS: The expression of VEGF in GC (70.1%) was significantly higher than that in gastric mucosa (20.0%) The expression of SSTR in GC (62.6%) was significantly lower than that in normal tissues (93.3%). VEGF and SSTR expression were both associated with histological differentiation, depth of invasion, TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). The negative expression of VEGF or the positive expression of SSTR was correlated with better overall survival of GC patients. The Cox analysis demonstrated that the expression of VEGF and SSTR, pathological type, TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were the independent predictors for overall survival in GC (P = 0.005, P = 0.006, P = 0.003, P = 0.002, and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The expression of VEGF and SSTR were associated with progression and prognosis of GC.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Receptores de Somatostatina/análise , Neoplasias Gástricas/química , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diferenciação Celular , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 38(9): 556-9, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14680612

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of ceramide monohexoside (CMH) on resistance to cisplatin and apoptosis in ovarian cell line COC1/DDP, and to provide new ideals and clues to seek new effective methods for studying the mechanism and reversing the resistance in ovarian cell line as well. METHODS: COC1 cells and COC1/DDP cells (before and after the treatment of mifepristone) were collected and neutral glycosphingolipids (N-GSLs) of the cells was isolated and purified, changes of CMH content were analyzed by high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). The COC1/DDP cells were divided into three groups, one treated by cisplatin, one treated by mifepristone, the other treated by cisplatin and mifepristone. The survival rate of cells in three groups were evaluated by the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay, DNA ladders were presented by DNA gel electrophoresis, the forms of cells were observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM). RESULTS: The levels of CMH were (37.1 +/- 3.3)% in COC1/DDP, higher than that in COC1 (14.1 +/- 1.4)% (P < 0.001). After treating by 1.25, 5 micro mol/L mifepristone, the CMH were (26.6 +/- 2.6)% (P < 0.05) and (17.5 +/- 0.7)% (P < 0.001), respectively. Mifepristone had no effect on the viability of COC1/DDP cell below a concentration of 5 micro mol/L. But when mifepristone of 1.25 or 5 micro mol/L combined with cisplatin at a concentration of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.25, 2.5 micro g/ml, the inhibition rate of COC1/DDP cell is higher than that of COC1/DDP cells only treated by cisplatin at the concentration of 0.1 to 2.5 micro g/ml (P < 0.001). The combined treatment elicited DNA fragmentation, however, neither cisplatin of 1.25 micro g/ml nor mifepristone of 5 micro mol/L alone could potentiate DNA fragmentation. After the combined treatment, the COC1/DDP cells produced apoptosis body. CONCLUSIONS: CMH is related with resistance to cisplantin in ovarian cell line COC1/DDP. When CMH of COC1/DDP cells was inhibited by mifepristone, the cells were sensitive to cisplatin and apoptosis was elicited.


Assuntos
Cerebrosídeos/fisiologia , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Cerebrosídeos/análise , Cerebrosídeos/antagonistas & inibidores , DNA de Neoplasias/análise , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/ultraestrutura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...