RARRES2 regulates lipid metabolic reprogramming to mediate the development of brain metastasis in triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, is characterized by a high incidence of brain metastasis (BrM) and a poor prognosis. As the most lethal form of breast cancer, BrM remains a major clinical challenge due to its rising incidence and lack of effective treatment strategies. Recent evidence suggested a potential role of lipid metabolic reprogramming in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM), but the underlying mechanisms are far from being fully elucidated. METHODS: Through analysis of BCBrM transcriptome data from mice and patients, and immunohistochemical validation on patient tissues, we identified and verified the specific down-regulation of retinoic acid receptor responder 2 (RARRES2), a multifunctional adipokine and chemokine, in BrM of TNBC. We investigated the effect of aberrant RARRES2 expression of BrM in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Key signaling pathway components were evaluated using multi-omics approaches. Lipidomics were performed to elucidate the regulation of lipid metabolic reprogramming of RARRES2. RESULTS: We found that down-regulation of RARRES2 is specifically associated with BCBrM, and that RARRES2 deficiency promoted BCBrM through lipid metabolic reprogramming. Mechanistically, reduced expression of RARRES2 in brain metastatic potential TNBC cells resulted in increased levels of glycerophospholipid and decreased levels of triacylglycerols by regulating phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1) signaling pathway to facilitate the survival of breast cancer cells in the unique brain microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Our work uncovers an essential role of RARRES2 in linking lipid metabolic reprogramming and the development of BrM. RARRES2-dependent metabolic functions may serve as potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets for BCBrM.

Expression dynamics of periodic transcripts during cancer cell cycle progression and their correlation with anticancer drug sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: The cell cycle is at the center of cellular activities and is orchestrated by complex regulatory mechanisms, among which transcriptional regulation is one of the most important components. Alternative splicing dramatically expands the regulatory network by producing transcript isoforms of genes to exquisitely control the cell cycle. However, the patterns of transcript isoform expression in the cell cycle are unclear. Therapies targeting cell cycle checkpoints are commonly used as anticancer therapies, but none of them have been designed or evaluated at the alternative splicing transcript level. The utility of these transcripts as markers of cell cycle-related drug sensitivity is still unknown, and studies on the expression patterns of cell cycle-targeting drug-related transcripts are also rare. METHODS: To explore alternative splicing patterns during cell cycle progression, we performed sequential transcriptomic assays following cell cycle synchronization in colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell lines, using flow cytometry and reference cell cycle transcripts to confirm the cell cycle phases of samples, and we developed a new algorithm to describe the periodic patterns of transcripts fluctuating during the cell cycle. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) drug sensitivity datasets and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) transcript datasets were used to assess the correlation of genes and their transcript isoforms with drug sensitivity. We identified transcripts associated with typical drugs targeting cell cycle by determining correlation coefficients. Cytotoxicity assays were used to confirm the effect of ENST00000257904 against cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Finally, alternative splicing transcripts associated with mitotic (M) phase arrest were analyzed using an RNA synthesis inhibition assay and transcriptome analysis. RESULTS: We established high-resolution transcriptome datasets of synchronized cell cycle samples from colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. The results of the cell cycle assessment showed that 43,326, 41,578 and 29,244 transcripts were found to be periodically expressed in HeLa, HCT116 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively, among which 1280 transcripts showed this expression pattern in all three cancer cell lines. Drug sensitivity assessments showed that a large number of these transcripts displayed a higher correlation with drug sensitivity than their corresponding genes. Cell cycle-related drug screening showed that the level of the CDK4 transcript ENST00000547281 was more significantly associated with the resistance of cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors than the level of the CDK4 reference transcript ENST00000257904. The transcriptional inhibition assay following M phase arrest further confirmed the M-phase-specific expression of the splicing transcripts. Combined with the cell cycle-related drug screening, the results also showed that a set of periodic transcripts, for example, ENST00000314392 (a dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2 isoform transcript), was more associated with drug sensitivity than the levels of their corresponding gene transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified a panel of cell cycle-related periodic transcripts and found that the levels of transcripts of drug target genes showed different values for predicting drug sensitivity, providing novel insights into alternative splicing-related drug development and evaluation.