Exploring the Risk Factors for the Misdiagnosis of Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the present situation and risk factors for the misdiagnosis of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), providing the basis for accurate diagnosis of ONFH. METHODS: For this retrospective study, 1471 patients with ONFH were selected from the China Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head Database (CONFHD). These patients had been recruited between July 2016 and December 2018. According to whether or not they were misdiagnosed, the patients were divided into two groups, with 1168 cases (22-84 years old) included in the diagnosis group and 303 cases (21-80 years old) in the misdiagnosis group. Misdiagnosis was measured using the following criteria: (i) the patient had the same symptoms and signs, and the second diagnosis was not consistent with the initial diagnosis within 6 months; and (ii) the patient was admitted to a hospital participating in CONFHD and the previous diagnosis was inconsistent with the diagnosis given by the expert group. Comparisons of age, visual analogue scale for pain, and body mass index between the two groups were performed using a t-test. Gender, causes of ONFH, primary diseases requiring corticosteroids, methods of corticosteroid use, corticosteroid species, type of trauma, onset side of the disease, pain side, whether symptoms are hidden, and type of imaging examination at the initial visit were compared using the χ2 -test. Years of alcohol consumption, weekly alcohol consumption, and physician title at the initial visit were compared using a Mann-Whitney U-test. Furthermore, the statistically significant factors were evaluated using multiple regression analysis to investigate the risk factors of misdiagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients (20.6%) were misdiagnosed: 118 cases were misdiagnosed as lumbar disc herniation, 86 cases as hip synovitis, 48 cases as hip osteoarthritis, 32 cases as rheumatoid arthritis, 11 cases as piriformis syndrome, 5 cases as sciatica, and 3 cases as soft-tissue injury. Whether symptoms are hidden (P = 0.038, odds ratio [OR] = 1.546, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.025-2.332), physician title at the initial visit (P < 0.001, OR = 3.324, 95% CI = 1.850-5.972), X-ray examination (P < 0.001, OR = 4.742, 95% CI = 3.159-7.118), corticosteroids (P < 0.001, OR = 0.295, 95% CI = 0.163-0.534), alcohol (P < 0.001, OR = 0.305, 95% CI = 0.171-0.546), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination (P = 0.042, OR = 0.649, 95% CI = 0.427-0.985) were each found to be associated with misdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is easily misdiagnosed as lumbar disc herniation, hip synovitis, hip osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Patient history of corticosteroid use or alcohol abuse and MRI examination at the initial diagnosis may be protective factors for misdiagnosis. Hidden symptoms, physician title at the initial visit (as attending doctor or resident doctor), and only X-ray examination at the initial diagnosis may be risk factors for misdiagnosis.

Imaging findings of Bowen's disease: A comparison between ultrasound biomicroscopy and conventional high-frequency ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the imaging findings of Bowen's disease (BD) between ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and conventional high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS). METHODS: A total of 29 pathologically proven BD lesions in 28 patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study, and all were after surgery. All the lesions were imaged with both UBM and HFUS. The imaging features on HFUS and UBM were analyzed and compared. The diagnostic results of ultrasound for BD were referenced with pathology results. RESULTS: All the 29 (100%) BD lesions appeared hypoechogenicity, solid component, and superficial hyperechoic layer (ie, keratinization) on both UBM and HFUS. The typical imaging feature of BD lesions, that was, infiltration depth confined to the epidermis, was visualized in 25 (86.2%, 25/29) lesions on UBM whereas 15 (51.7%, 15/29) on HFUS (P = .002). A "wave sign," which corresponds to the surface keratinization of BD lesion, was visualized in 17 (58.6%, 17/29) of BD lesions on UBM whereas 6 (20.7%, 6/29) on HFUS (P = .001). UBM and HFUS correctly diagnosed 25 (86.2%, 25/29) and 15 (51.7%, 15/29) BD lesions, respectively (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Bowen's disease has some typical imaging features on US. The "wave sign" of the superficial hyperechoic layer and the clear borderline between the tumor in epidermis and the slightly hyperechoic dermis layer are better depicted by UBM in comparison with HFUS, which leads to a more accurate diagnosis of BD. UBM has potential to be used as a diagnostic tool for characterization of BD on account of its high resolution.

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and High-Frequency Ultrasound for Evaluating Extramammary Paget Disease With Pathologic Correlation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) in the assessment of extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) and to correlate the imaging features with pathologic findings. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we described the imaging features from UBM and HFUS based on 17 pathologically proven EMPD cases. The performance for visualizing layer involvement by UBM and HFUS was compared. Additionally, we checked the consistency between layer involvement of the lesions on UBM images and the pathologic results. Additionally, blood flow and the status of lymph nodes were investigated with HFUS. RESULTS: Ultrasound biomicroscopy revealed that all 17 lesions (100%) were hypoechoic and grew in a creeping form. The feature of layer involvement was shown in 10 lesions (58.8%) limited to the epidermis and 6 lesions (35.3%) involving the dermis, and the remaining lesion (5.9%) involved the full skin layers. Layer involvement was clearly displayed by UBM for all lesions (100%) but for only 5 lesions (29.4%) by HFUS (P < .001). Additionally, the layer involvement of 15 lesions (88.2%) on UBM was consistent with the pathologic results (κ = 0.746). High-frequency ultrasound revealed profuse blood flow in most lesions (64.7% [11 of 17]), and 1 case showed inguinal lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of UBM and HFUS can provide key information on EMPD based on ultrasound features. Comparatively, UBM provides clearer morphologic information, whereas HFUS provides information on lymph node metastasis and blood flow.