Biomechanical characteristic differences of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures of femur: a comparative study based on finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Given the recent application of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted femoral intertrochanteric fractures (CFIFs), there is still a lack of deep understanding and comparative evaluation of their biomechanical properties. Therefore, this study aims to systematically compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two new devices with traditional proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTan nails in the fixation of CFIFs through finite element analysis. METHODS: Based on the validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate CFIFs model. In this model, PFNA, InterTan nails, proximal femoral bionic nails (PFBN), and new intramedullary systems (NIS) were implanted, totaling four groups of finite element models. Each group of models was subjected to simulation tests under a vertical load of 2100 N to evaluate the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of the femur and intramedullary nail devices. RESULTS: Under a vertical load of 2100 N, a comparative analysis of the four finite element models showed that the NIS device exhibited the most superior performance in terms of peak displacement, while the PFNA device performed relatively poorly. Although the NIS device had the highest peak stress in the femur, it had the smallest peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices, and the peak stress was mainly concentrated on the lateral side of the femur, with significantly lower stress in the proximal femur compared to the other three intramedullary nail devices. In contrast, the PFBN device had the lowest peak stress in the femur, and its peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices was also less than that of PFNA and InterTan nails. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that in the treatment of CFIFs, PFBN and NIS devices exhibit superior biomechanical performance compared to traditional PFNA and InterTan nail devices. Especially the NIS device, which can achieve good biomechanical results when fixing femoral intertrochanteric fractures with missing medial wall. Therefore, both PFBN and NIS devices can be considered reliable closed reduction and internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application value.

Biomechanical difference analysis of new and classic intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures: finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is currently a lack of in-depth comparative evaluation regarding the biomechanical properties of novel intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures (BFNF). This study aims to utilize finite element analysis to compare the performance differences of two novel devices with traditional PFNA and InterTan nails in the fixation of BFNF. METHODS: Based on a validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate BFNF model and implanted four different intramedullary nail devices: PFNA, InterTan nail, PFBN (proximal femoral biomimetic nail), and NIS (novel intramedullary system). Under a vertical load of 2100N, the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of each group of models were evaluated through simulation testing. RESULTS: Under a load of 2100N, the PFBN device exhibited the best performance in terms of displacement and peak stress, while PFNA performed poorly. The peak displacement of the NIS device was lower than that of PFNA and InterTan nails, while the peak stress of the InterTan nail was lower than that of PFNA and NIS. CONCLUSION: The PFBN device demonstrates stronger load-bearing and shear-resistant properties in the treatment of BFNF, and the NIS device also shows significant improvement in stability. Therefore, both the PFBN and NIS devices are reliable internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application prospects.

Biomechanical study of a biplanar double support screw (BDSF) technique based on Pauwels angle in femoral neck fractures: finite element analysis.

Objective: The objective of the present study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages associated with a biplanar double support screw (BDSF) internal fixation device. Methods: Two distinct femoral neck fracture models, one with a 30° angle and the other with a 70° angle, were created using a verified and effective finite element model. Accordingly, a total of eight groups of finite element models were utilized, each implanted with different configurations of fixation devices, including distal screw 150° BDSF, distal screw 165° BDSF, 3 CLS arranged in an inverted triangle configuration, and 4 CLS arranged in a "α" configuration. Subsequently, the displacement and distribution of Von Mises stress (VMS) in the femur and internal fixation device were assessed in each fracture group under an axial load of 2100 N. Results: At Pauwels 30° Angle, the femur with a 150°-BDSF orientation exhibited a maximum displacement of 3.17 mm, while the femur with a 165°-BDSF orientation displayed a maximum displacement of 3.13 mm. When compared with the femoral neck fracture model characterized by a Pauwels Angle of 70°, the shear force observed in the 70° model was significantly higher than that in the 30° model. Conversely, the stability of the 30° model was significantly superior to that of the 70° model. Furthermore, in the 70° model, the BDSF group exhibited a maximum femur displacement that was lower than both the 3CCS (3.46 mm) and 4CCS (3.43 mm) thresholds. Conclusion: The biomechanical properties of the BDSF internal fixation device are superior to the other two hollow screw internal fixation devices. Correspondingly, superior biomechanical outcomes can be achieved through the implementation of distal screw insertion at an angle of 165°. Thus, the BDSF internal fixation technique can be considered as a viable closed reduction internal fixation technique for managing femoral neck fractures at varying Pauwels angles.