Ipidacrine (Axamon), A Reversible Cholinesterase Inhibitor, Improves Erectile Function in Male Rats With Diabetes Mellitus-Induced Erectile Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Management of diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction (DMED) is challenging because of its insufficient responses to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. AIM: To compare the effects of ipidacrine, a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, and sildenafil on DMED in a rat model of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes. METHODS: Erectile dysfunction (ED) caused by STZ-induced diabetes mellitus was modeled in adult male Wistar rats, which were randomized to 4 groups: untreated diabetic rats, sildenafil (5 mg/kg), ipidacrine (3.6 mg/kg) and ipidacrine (6.7 mg/kg). The test drug (ipidacrine), comparator (sildenafil) or control substance (1% starch solution) were administered orally for 5 days or 14 days. Erectile function was assessed by the change in the maximum intracavernous pressure (ICPmax) following cavernous nerve electrical stimulation. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded, and the ICPmax/MAP ratio was calculated. Sexual behavior, cholinesterase activity and blood testosterone level tests assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The quantitative value of ICPmax/MAP 14 days after the start of administration of the test drug and the comparison drug. RESULTS: Animals with STZ-induced diabetes mellitus showed a significant decrease in ICPmax and ICPmax/MAP ratio compared to the intact control group. When ipidacrine was administered to rats with DMED for 14 days, an increase in these indicators was noted. It was proved that ipidacrine at a dose of 6.7 mg/kg has noninferiority compared to sildenafil on the DMED model. Significant increase in ICPmax compared to STZ-control after electrostimulation of the cavernous nerve was recorded following administration of ipidacrine at a dose of 6.7 mg/kg (P < .05) and sildenafil at a dose 5 mg/kg (P < .05). Neither the test drug, nor the comparator were associated with increase in testosterone levels in blood; as well both drugs did not promote activation of sexual behavior. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ipidacrine may be considered as an effective therapy for DMED but needs to be verified in human investigations. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The role of ipidacrine, was firstly demonstrated in rats with DMED. However, the results were obtained in animal experiments, and will be further tested in the study of receptor interactions and the determination of cellular targets. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that administration of ipidacrine, the reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, improved erectile function in diabetic rats and these results may be beneficial in further studies using ipidacrine for treatment of DMED, particularly in non-responders to PDE5 inhibitors. Bykov V, Gushchina E, Morozov S, et al. Ipidacrine (Axamon), A Reversible Cholinesterase Inhibitor, Improves Erectile Function in Male Rats With Diabetes Mellitus-Induced Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med 2022;10:100477.

The optimal duration of alarm therapy use in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE) has a range of 1.6-5.3% in adolescents and 7.5-12.4% in children of 5-10 years. Alarm intervention has been well known for more than 30 years. This method is a reliable and safe means of treating primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis, being effective in 60-80% of cases. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of alarm intervention prolongation after the cure in order to reduce the risk of disease recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred ninety-four boys and 161 girls (455 persons in total) of age 9-14 years (average 11.4 years) took part in the prospective randomized study. After preselection and establishing diagnosis, all patients were randomly divided in three groups. In group А (n = 139) alarm system treatment was carried out within 12 weeks, in group В (n = 136) 16 weeks, and in group С (n = 139) 20 weeks. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who no longer wet the bed (for 2 weeks or more) immediately after treatment in groups B (80.7%) and C (85.5%) was higher than in group A (67.4%) if the probability of error is pB/A < 0.05; pC/A < 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment success between groups B and C immediately after treatment. The percentage of patients who no longer wet the bed 3 months after the end of treatment in groups B (71.2%) and C (77.1%) was higher than in the group A (45.9%) if the probability of error is pB/A < 0.05; pC/A < 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment success between groups B and C 3 months after treatment. During the year this ratio did not change. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that the effective duration of alarm intervention is found in the range 16-20 weeks and involves an uninterrupted course of treatment. Perhaps this range of time is optimal for the formation of a neuroreflexive mechanism that creates a habit for independent awakening in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. CONCLUSION: The effective duration of alarm intervention is likely to be 16-20 weeks of an uninterrupted course of treatment. This time interval ensures the maximum effectiveness of treatment and the stability of long-term results.

Social, Economic, and Medical Factors Associated With Solifenacin Therapy Compliance Among Workers Who Suffer From Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of hyperactive-type lower urinary tract symptoms is 45.2%, with shares of overactive bladder (OAB) and urge incontinence (UI) symptoms of 10.7% and 8.2%, respectively. We investigated the possible impact of a wide range of social, economic, and medical factors on compliance with solifenacin treatment in the working population. METHODS: Social, economic, and medical factors as well as the Overactive Bladder questionnaire - the OAB-q Short Form (OAB-q SF), bladder diaries, and uroflowmetry of 1,038 people who were administered solifenacin for a year were gathered from employer documentation. RESULTS: Among the subjects, 32% maintained their compliance with solifenacin treatment throughout the year. Only 65% of the patients had compliance exceeding 80%, and 17% of patients had compliance of ≥50%, yet less than 80% were still taking solifenacin 12 months after the beginning of this experiment. Working people whose compliance level was, at least, 80% had reliably higher (P≤0.01) average age, annual salary, and treatment efficacy, and a greater treatment satisfaction level, as well as a lack of satisfaction with other antimuscarinic treatments and higher rate of urge UI diagnosis. The same cohort also featured a lower level (P≤0.01) of caffeine abuse and lower share of salary spent purchasing solifenacin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that compliance with solifenacin treatment is associated with a number of significant medical, social, and economic factors. The medical factors included the type of urination disorder, severity of incontinence symptoms, presence of side effects, treatment efficacy and patients' satisfaction with it, and experience using other antimuscarinic treatments. Among the social and economic factors, those with the strongest correlation to compliance were patient age, employment in medicine and education, annual income level, percentage of solifenacin purchase expenditures, and caffeine abuse. Factors with a weaker, but still significant, association were gender, employment in the transportation industry, and monthly income level.

Social, Economic, and Medical Factors Associated With Solifenacin Therapy Compliance Among Workers Who Suffer From Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms / 대한배뇨장애요실금학회지

PURPOSE: The prevalence of hyperactive-type lower urinary tract symptoms is 45.2%, with shares of overactive bladder (OAB) and urge incontinence (UI) symptoms of 10.7% and 8.2%, respectively. We investigated the possible impact of a wide range of social, economic, and medical factors on compliance with solifenacin treatment in the working population. METHODS: Social, economic, and medical factors as well as the Overactive Bladder questionnaire – the OAB-q Short Form (OAB-q SF), bladder diaries, and uroflowmetry of 1,038 people who were administered solifenacin for a year were gathered from employer documentation. RESULTS: Among the subjects, 32% maintained their compliance with solifenacin treatment throughout the year. Only 65% of the patients had compliance exceeding 80%, and 17% of patients had compliance of ≥50%, yet less than 80% were still taking solifenacin 12 months after the beginning of this experiment. Working people whose compliance level was, at least, 80% had reliably higher (P≤0.01) average age, annual salary, and treatment efficacy, and a greater treatment satisfaction level, as well as a lack of satisfaction with other antimuscarinic treatments and higher rate of urge UI diagnosis. The same cohort also featured a lower level (P≤0.01) of caffeine abuse and lower share of salary spent purchasing solifenacin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that compliance with solifenacin treatment is associated with a number of significant medical, social, and economic factors. The medical factors included the type of urination disorder, severity of incontinence symptoms, presence of side effects, treatment efficacy and patients’ satisfaction with it, and experience using other antimuscarinic treatments. Among the social and economic factors, those with the strongest correlation to compliance were patient age, employment in medicine and education, annual income level, percentage of solifenacin purchase expenditures, and caffeine abuse. Factors with a weaker, but still significant, association were gender, employment in the transportation industry, and monthly income level.