Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 45(4): 259-264, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534309

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the retentive force of three glass-ionomer luting cements used with prefabricated primary zirconium crowns (PPZCs) and to assess whether the retentive force was dependent on cementation material or different PPZCs brands. STUDY DESIGN: Four mandibular right second molar PPZCs were selected, one each from four manufacturers-NuSmile®ZR, Sprig Crowns, Cheng Crowns and Kinder Krowns. Silicone impressions of the outer surface of crowns were taken; stone dies prepared and reduced to fit the corresponding brand. 24 alginate impressions of each die obtained and filled with core buildup flowable composite. 96 composite tooth-replicas thus achieved were divided into four groups and further categorized into three subgroups of eight samples based on luting cements used - BioCem, FujiCEM®2 and KetacCem. Samples were thermocycled, placed in artificial saliva for one week followed by assessment of retentive force for crown dislodgment and failure mode. RESULTS: Data was statistically evaluated using two-way ANOVA, HSD (P <0.05). KetacCem had the lowest retentive force while BioCem showed comparatively higher value to FujiCEM®2. Adhesive failure modes were predominant with cement mainly adhering to crown's internal surface. CONCLUSIONS: Resin-based GI cements offered superior retention than conventional GI cements for PPZCs and retentive force was dependent on cement type.


Assuntos
Retenção em Prótese Dentária , Zircônio , Resinas Acrílicas , Cimentação , Coroas , Cimentos Dentários , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Cimentos de Resina , Dióxido de Silício
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...