RESUMO
Background: Social determinants of health are important contributors to maternal and child health outcomes. Limited existing research examines the relationship between housing instability during pregnancy and perinatal care utilization. Our objective was to evaluate whether antenatal housing instability is associated with differences in perinatal care utilization and outcomes. Materials and Methods: Participants who were surveyed during their postpartum hospitalization were considered to have experienced housing instability if they answered affirmatively to at least one of six screening items. The primary outcome was adequacy of prenatal care measured by the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index. Maternal, neonatal, and postpartum outcomes, including utilization and breastfeeding, were also collected as secondary outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Results: In this cohort (N = 490), 11.2% (N = 55) experienced housing instability during pregnancy. Participants with unstable housing were more likely to have inadequate prenatal care (17.3% vs. 3.9%; odds ratio [OR] 5.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-12.14, p < 0.001), but findings were not significant after adjustment (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 0.55-5.41, p = 0.35). Similarly, postpartum visit attendance was lower for individuals with unstable housing (79.6% vs. 91.2%), but there was no difference in the odds of the postpartum visit attendance after adjustment (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.29-1.66, p = 0.14). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant association with the maternal, neonatal, and other postpartum secondary outcomes. Housing instability appears to be a risk marker that is related to other social determinants of health. Given the range of housing instability experiences, future research must account for specific types and degrees of housing instability and their potential perinatal consequences.
Assuntos
Assistência Perinatal , Complicações na Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Instabilidade Habitacional , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Período Pós-PartoAssuntos
Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/patologia , Vulva/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Antígenos CD20/análise , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Bendamustina/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Biópsia , Feminino , Histocitoquímica , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Leucossialina/análise , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma não Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Microscopia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rituximab/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vulvares/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The Breathe Easy at Home Program enables clinicians to refer asthmatic patients to Boston Inspectional Services Department (ISD) if they suspect housing conditions trigger symptoms. The authors conducted one-on-one interviews with clinicians (n = 10) who referred patients, and focus groups with inspectors from the ISD (n = 9) and a variety of stakeholders (n = 13), to gain insight into program function and implementation. Clinician interviews revealed inconsistencies in enrollment approaches, dissatisfaction with the web-based system, and patient follow-up difficulties. Inspectors identified barriers to working effectively with residents and landlords, and the stakeholder focus group highlighted successes of an unusual institutional collaboration. Interviews and focus groups identified strong and personal rapport between clinicians, inspectors, and patients as key to program retention, and that participating families required additional support throughout the process. Despite recommendations for improvement in program implementation, clinicians, inspectors, and stakeholders felt that the program overall improved both the home environment and asthma outcomes.