Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a moral reasoning exercise can improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities METHODS: A randomised internet survey focussing on patient age in healthcare allocation was repeated twice. From 2574 internet panel members from the USA and Canada, 2020 (79%) completed the baseline survey and 1247 (62%) completed the follow-up. We elicited respondent preferences for age via five allocation scenarios. In each scenario, a hypothetical health planner made a decision to fund one of two programmes identical except for average patient age (35 vs 65 years). Half of the respondents (intervention group) were randomly assigned to receive an additional moral reasoning exercise. Responses were elicited again 7 weeks later. Numerical scores ranging from -5 (strongest preference for younger patients) to +5 (strongest preference for older patients); 0 indicates no age preference. Response quality was assessed by propensity to choose extreme or neutral values, internal consistency, temporal stability and appeal to prejudicial factors. RESULTS: With the exception of a scenario offering palliative care, respondents preferred offering scarce resources to younger patients in all clinical contexts. This preference for younger patients was weaker in the intervention group. Indicators of response quality favoured the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Although people generally prefer allocating scarce resources to young patients over older ones, these preferences are significantly reduced when participants are encouraged to reflect carefully on a wide range of moral principles. A moral reasoning exercise is a promising strategy to improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities.

The potential impact of decision role and patient age on end-of-life treatment decision making.

BACKGROUND: Recent research demonstrates that people sometimes make different medical decisions for others than they would make for themselves. This finding is particularly relevant to end-of-life decisions, which are often made by surrogates and require a trade-off between prolonging life and maintaining quality of life. We examine the impact of decision role, patient age, decision maker age and multiple individual differences on these treatment decisions. METHODS: Participants read a scenario about a terminally ill cancer patient faced with a choice between an aggressive chemotherapy regimen that will extend life by two years and palliative treatments to control discomfort for one remaining month. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three decision roles (patient, physician, or an abstract other) and the scenario randomly varied whether the patient was described as 25 or 65-years old. RESULTS: When deciding for a 65-year old patient, approximately 60% of participants selected aggressive chemotherapy regardless of decision role. When deciding for a 25-year old patient, however, participants were more likely to select chemotherapy for a patient (physician role) or another person (abstract other) than for themselves (70%, 67%, and 59%, respectively). In addition, confidence that powerful others (eg, physicians) control one's health, as well as respondents' age and race, consistently predicted treatment choices. CONCLUSIONS: Patient age appears to influence medical decisions made for others but not those that we make for ourselves. These findings may help to explain the discord that often occurs when younger cancer patients refuse life-extending treatments.

Knowledge of blood pressure targets among patients with diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Tight blood pressure (BP) control is the single most important intervention to prevent cardiovascular mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, little is known about how many patients have specific target BP levels or the factors associated with patients' knowledge of these targets. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine what proportion of patients with diabetes have BP targets; (2) To determine patient characteristics associated with having a BP target. METHODS: Cross-sectional, anonymous survey of 500 randomly selected outpatients with hypertension and DM receiving care in any Veterans Health Administration outpatient clinic in 2003. We examined multivariate associations between patient characteristics and having targets for BP. Covariates included age, race, gender, and education level; and factors specific to diabetes and BP treatment, including medication use, diabetes duration, and number of visits to diabetes healthcare providers in the previous year. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-eight (80%) patients responded. Although most (91%) had blood glucose targets, fewer than 60% reported having a BP target. In multivariate analyses, college education was associated with having a BP target (AOR 1.97 [95% CI: 1.16-3.34]). CONCLUSIONS: Less than two-thirds of diabetic, hypertensive patients had BP targets. Encouraging patients to set target BPs may promote hypertension self-management in this high-risk patient population. Less educated patients may especially benefit from interventions to increase awareness of BP targets.