Outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services: A systematic review.

Objective: The primary aim of this project was to apply systematic review methods to synthesize the literature on outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. The secondary aim was to use the results of the systematic review to identify gaps in the extant literature and describe priorities for future research. Method: We identified the relevant studies using a rigorous search strategy, collected data on methodological variables, assessed the risk of bias in the studies, summarized findings by topic and subtopic areas, identified strengths and weaknesses of the literature, and provided recommendations for future research. The outcomes measured were satisfaction, changes in resource or strategy utilization, and changes in symptoms or functioning (i.e. changes in child emotional, behavioral, cognitive, or academic problems, parent stress, or family functioning). Results: The final sources of data were 26 records, pertaining to a total of 974 children who received neuropsychological services. Parents were generally satisfied with services and reported high clinician empathy and increased level of knowledge, based on the evaluation. However, they reported less often that the neuropsychologist provided actual help. Informal home and school-based strategies were implemented more often than other types of recommendations. The research on changes in child symptoms and functioning was limited, but suggests improvements. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review of outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. Larger studies involving data collection at multiple time points are needed in order to further clarify mechanisms leading to outcomes and potential targets for improving them.

Do parents implement pediatric neuropsychological report recommendations?

OBJECTIVE: We explored parent-reported implementation rates of medical, home/community, and school recommendations following a pediatric neuropsychological evaluation, as well as demographic group differences in, and potential barriers to, recommendation implementation. METHOD: Participants were 55 parents of children and adolescents who completed an outpatient neuropsychological evaluation in a university-based hospital neuropsychology clinic within 4 to 6 months prior to study participation. Participants were contacted by phone to complete a short interview regarding implementation of report recommendations. RESULTS: Slightly over half (52%) of all recommendations were implemented, with higher implementation rates of school (62%) and home/community recommendations (53%) than medical recommendations (40%). Results indicated significantly lower recommendation implementation for households with low income (particularly for medical recommendations). Reported reasons for not implementing recommendations included lack of time, lack of resources (geographical and financial), ambivalence about the need to implement the recommendation, not remembering the recommendation, confusion about how to implement the recommendation, and resistance from schools and teachers. CONCLUSIONS: The results for this study provide information for pediatric neuropsychologists regarding rates of recommendation implementation, with differences identified based on type of recommendation and demographic factors. Further empirical investigation is indicated in order to determine practical, concrete steps to improve recommendation implementation.

Observation-centered approach to ASD assessment in Tanzania.

Abstract In many lower-income countries, there is a paucity of assessment services for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)., Guidelines will be provided for conducting cross-cultural assessments in the context of limited validated resources in Tanzania. By examining behavioral, social, and adaptive differences we were able to provide differential diagnostic evaluations aligning with best practice standards for 41 children in Tanzania age 2-21 years. We describe the utility of a flexible, behavioral observation instrument, the Childhood Autism Rating Scales, Second Edition (CARS2), to gather diagnostic information in a culturally sensitive manner. We observed that the ASD group was characterized by significantly higher scores on the CARS2, F  =  21.09, p < .001, η(2)  =  .37, than the general delay comparison group. Additional recommendations are provided for making cultural adaptations to current assessment instruments for use in a country without normed instruments, such as Tanzania.

Executive function in probands with autism with average IQ and their unaffected first-degree relatives.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize executive function (EF) in pedigrees of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and average IQ. The authors examined the hypothesis that deficits in EF relate to lower levels of adaptive functioning, and they assessed evidence for a cognitive extended phenotype in unaffected relatives in a large, well-characterized sample. METHOD: Proband EF was assessed by parent-report questionnaires (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning [BRIEF], n = 109) and child neuropsychological tests (Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System [D-KEFS], n = 35). EF also was examined in parents (D-KEFS, n = 335) and unaffected siblings (BRIEF, n = 114; D-KEFS, n = 57). Adaptive functioning was assessed by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (n = 155). All data were obtained from the Autism Consortium Clinical Genetics Database. RESULTS: Individuals with ASD showed important EF weaknesses. Multiple regression analyses showed that parent-reported EF deficits were related to profound decreases in adaptive functioning even after controlling for age, IQ, and severity of ASD symptoms. Parent-reported EF also was related to adaptive skills in preschoolers. First-degree unaffected relatives did not demonstrate difficulties with EF compared with normative data. CONCLUSION: In this study, EF impairments do not appear to relate to broad familial risk factors for ASD but may be associated with factors relevant to the expression of ASD in probands. Results support the benefits of EF assessment as a way to identify potential therapeutic targets that could lead to improved adaptive behavior in children with ASD and average IQ.

Self-reported childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms are not specific to the disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the specificity of self-reported childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms using the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) in young adults with (1) a previous diagnosis of ADHD, (2) comorbid ADHD and psychological symptoms or diagnoses, (3) psychological diagnoses or symptoms without comorbid ADHD, and (4) controls. METHOD: One thousand four hundred thirty-one non-treatment-seeking individuals (508 males), aged 18 to 25 years, were assigned to 1 of 4 groups (psychological controls, controls, ADHD, ADHD comorbid), based on responses to psychological, demographic, and health history questionnaires completed as part of a larger study. Responses to the WURS were analyzed at the individual item and subtest levels for their specificity to ADHD using area under the curve analyses. RESULTS: The standard WURS cutoff score of 46 was neither sensitive nor specific to ADHD, with a high rate of false positives in psychological controls. Factor analyses supported a 5-factor model (conduct problems, impulsivity problems, mood difficulties, inattention/anxiety symptoms, poor academic functioning) that accounted for 62% of the total variance; these factors were used to generate factor-based WURS subscales. Three subscales (impulsivity, poor academic functioning, and inattention/anxiety symptoms) showed potential for discriminating ADHD from controls among females. No subscales showed adequate sensitivity or specificity for discriminating ADHD from psychological controls among the males. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide further evidence that retrospective self-report of childhood ADHD symptoms is not specific to ADHD and highlight concerns about the reliance on self-report of childhood ADHD symptoms for diagnostic purposes. Results suggest consideration of specific types of symptoms, and sex differences might increase diagnostic use of self-reported childhood symptoms.

The relationship of malingering test failure to self-reported symptoms and neuropsychological findings in adults referred for ADHD evaluation.

Diagnosis of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) adults is difficult, as neither symptom report nor neuropsychological findings are specific to ADHD. Few studies address the possibility that noncredible performance influences both symptom report and neuropsychological findings. The present study utilized archival data from young adults referred for concerns about ADHD, divided into three groups: (1) those who failed a measure of noncredible performance (the Word Memory Test; WMT), (2) those who met diagnostic criteria for ADHD, and (3) controls with psychological symptoms but no ADHD. Results showed a 31% failure rate on the WMT. Those who failed the WMT showed clinical levels of self-reported ADHD symptoms and impaired neuropsychological performance. Neither self-report measures nor neuropsychological tests could distinguish ADHD from psychological controls, with the exception of self-reported current hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and Stroop interference. Results underscore the effect of noncredible performance on both self-report and cognitive measures in ADHD.