Cancer-related fatigue and depression: a monocentric, prospective, cross-sectional study in advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is common in patients with advanced solid tumors and several risk factors are described. The possible role of depression is reported by clinicians despite the association with CRF being unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this monocentric, cross-sectional, prospective study we recruited patients with advanced solid tumors who were hospitalized at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan. The primary objective was to assess the correlation between CRF and depression. Secondary objectives were the estimation of CRF and depression prevalence and the identification of associated clinical risk factors. CRF and depression were evaluated through the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue subscale and the Zung Self Depression Scale (ZSDS) questionnaires. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to demonstrate the primary hypothesis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the impact of clinical variables. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were enrolled. The primary analysis found a linear correlation (P < 0.0001) between CRF and depression. The prevalence of CRF and of moderate to severe depressive symptoms was 43.5% and 29.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), anemia, distress, pain, and receiving oncological treatment were at a significantly higher risk for CRF, whereas poor ECOG PS, pain, and distress were risk factors for depression. In multivariate analysis, high levels of ZSDS were confirmed to be correlated to CRF: odds ratio of 3.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-15.20) and 11.20 (95% CI 2.35-53.36) for ZSDS of 50-59 and 60-100, respectively (P value for trend 0.002). Moreover, the ECOG PS score was confirmed to be significantly associated with CRF (OR 7.20; 95% CI 1.73-29.96; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a strong correlation between CRF and depression in patients with advanced solid tumors. Further investigations are needed to better understand this relationship and if depressive disorder therapeutic strategies could also impact on CRF.

Dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active drugs against breast cancer and the search after their optimal combination is under intensive investigation in both the advanced and early disease settings. A dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin (E) and docetaxel (D) was conducted in advanced breast cancer (ABC) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support and to characterise its toxicity and activity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who received neither palliative chemotherapy nor adjuvant anthracyclines (55% with dominant visceral disease and 66% with > or = 2 sites involved) with measurable/evaluable lesions, were treated at four dose levels starting from E 75 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2 to E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2. A maximum of four cycles of the combination was given every three weeks and four additional cycles of single agent D were allowed in responding patients. Cardiac function was monitored at baseline and at every second course by echocardiography. RESULTS: Febrile neutropenia (two patients) and prolonged, severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.1 x 10(9)/l for more than three days; one patient) defined the MTD of the combination without G-CSF support at E 90 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2. G-CSF was then routinely administered from the subsequent dose level of E 120 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2. The MTD with G-CSF support was established at E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2 (one patient with neutropenic fever together with failure of ANC recovery at day 21, three patients with ANC less than 0.1 x 10(9)/l for more than three days, one patient with both and one patient with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and toxic death from typhlitis while neutropenic). No severe neurotoxicity, mucositis, or fluid retention were observed and there were no clinical signs of cardiotoxicity. Antitumor activity was not a primary endpoint of the study: the overall response rate (ORR) in 40 evaluable patients was 60% (95% confidence interval: 43%-75%, 58% in liver disease, 84% in soft tissue) with no apparent dose-related effect. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range 2-30+), the overall time to progression (TTP) in nine patients without maintenance hormonal therapy was five months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of E and D proved to be an effective and safe regimen in poor- prognosis patients with ABC. G-CSF support allowed higher doses to be delivered safely but dose escalation did not translate into improved response rates (RR). The MTD without growth factors support was used, in a phase II trial, which also included patients with previous anthracycline-containing adjuvant regimens.

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in women with advanced breast cancer.

The primary aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given by 3-hour infusion and cyclophosphamide given by intravenous bolus every 3 weeks in patients with breast cancer. Patients had received a maximum of one prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was also determined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The 80 women who took part in this study received 347 fully evaluable courses of therapy. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; G-CSF support (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) was added at the subsequent cycle if specific dose-limiting toxicities had occurred during the previous cycle. Febrile neutropenia and severe thrombocytopenia defined the maximum tolerated doses as paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 2,000 mg/m2, with or without G-CSF support, in patients with or without a prior chemotherapy. Recommended doses were paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,750 mg/m2 in these two groups of patients. The overall response rate was 25% among patients who had received prior therapy for metastatic disease and 50% in patients who had not been previously treated. Complete remissions were reported in 9% of patients, but only among those who were previously untreated.

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The toxicity profile of prolonged infusions of paclitaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer has already been defined. The objective of this dose-finding study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of shorter (three-hour) infusions of paclitaxel in combination with i.v. bolus cyclophosphamide in patients who had previously received a maximum of one chemotherapy for advanced breast carcinoma. The MTD of the same regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support was then established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty women with metastatic breast cancer received a total of 352 fully evaluable courses of therapy. The starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 given every three weeks. At least three patients were treated at each dose level and if there were dose-limiting toxic effects during the first cycles three additional patients were entered. G-CSF support (5 micrograms/kg s.c.) was added to the second cycle if specific dose-limiting toxicities had occurred during the first cycle. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which more than two of six patients presented dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle. RESULT: Febrile neutropenia (n = 4) and severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1) defined the MTDs of paclitaxel as 200 mg/ m2 and of cyclophosphamide as 2,000 mg/m2 with or without G-CSF in patients with and, respectively, without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Non-hematologic toxicity was moderate. Recommended doses were 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 1,750 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide with or without G-CSF in patients with and, respectively, without prior chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 25% and 50%, respectively, in patients with and without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Complete remissions (9%) were reported only in patients without prior chemotherapy; antitumour activity in women with anthracycline-resistant disease, with an 8% response rate (95% CI: 1%-26%), was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 1,750 mg/m2 can be safely administered every three weeks to women with advanced breast cancer. The moderate antitumour activity observed with the schedule tested argues against its use as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer.