Analgesic onset and efficacy of a fast-acting formulation of acetaminophen in a postoperative dental impaction pain model.

OBJECTIVES: Speed of onset can be critical to an analgesic's efficacy treating acute pain. To enhance onset, a new oral acetaminophen formulation intended to be fast acting was developed. Two studies evaluated the analgesic onset, efficacy, and safety of this fast-acting acetaminophen (FA-acetaminophen) tablet relative to commercial acetaminophen caplets (ES-acetaminophen) and commercial ibuprofen liquid-filled gelatin capsules (LG-ibuprofen). METHODS: Two single-center, single-dose, inpatient, randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group design clinical trials were conducted using the postoperative dental impaction pain model. Subjects were healthy men and women aged 17-50 years experiencing moderate-to-severe pain after surgical extraction of at least three impacted third molars. In both studies, four treatment groups were evaluated: 1,000 mg acetaminophen as two 500 mg FA-acetaminophen tablets, 1,000 mg as two 500 mg ES-acetaminophen caplets, 400 mg ibuprofen as two 200 mg LG-ibuprofen capsules, and placebo. To maintain blinding, each subject received six units of study medication. Times to confirmed perceptible pain relief (TCPR) and meaningful pain relief (TMPR) were obtained using the double-stopwatch method. Pain intensity and relief were measured over 6 h following drug administration using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Time to use of rescue medication (naproxen sodium) and subject global evaluations of study medications at 6 h were collected. Pharmacokinetic blood sampling and safety assessments were performed. RESULTS: Studies 1 and 2 enrolled 240 and 420 subjects, respectively. No clinically important differences among treatment groups were observed for any demographic or baseline characteristics. Efficacy results showed all active treatments statistically superior to placebo. In Study 1, TCPR was statistically significantly shorter for FA-acetaminophen compared to ES-acetaminophen and LG-ibuprofen. In Study 2, no statistically significant differences in TCPR were noted across the active treatment groups. In Study 1, FA-acetaminophen 1,000 mg provided significantly shorter TMPR compared with LG-ibuprofen but not compared with ES-acetaminophen. In Study 2, no significant differences in TMPR were noted across the active treatment groups. In both Study 1 and 2 at 15 min after administration of study drug, PID and PAR scores were greater for FA-acetaminophen than LG-ibuprofen. CONCLUSIONS: Both studies suggested FA-acetaminophen had faster onset of action compared to ES-acetaminophen and LG-Ibuprofen. In light of the difference in TCPR and TMPR results between Study 1 and 2, an additional study is needed to further investigate time to analgesic onset of FA-acetaminophen compared with ES-acetaminophen and LG-Ibuprofen. STUDY REGISTRY NUMBERS: Study 1: NCT02735122; Study 2: NCT03224403.

JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006), A novel non-opioid with structural similarities to acetaminophen, produces relatively long-lasting analgesia after a single dose in patients undergoing 3rd molar extraction.

JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) is a non-opioid, non-NSAID analgesic and antipyretic compound with structural similarity to acetaminophen. Preclinical models show comparable analgesia relative to acetaminophen and no evidence of hepatotoxicity associated with overdose. Moreover, it was safe and generally well tolerated in a First-in-Human Study. This single-dose, single-center, inpatient, randomized, double-blind study in moderate-to-severe acute pain following third molar extraction compared efficacy and safety of 250 mg and 1000 mg JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006), 1000 mg acetaminophen, and placebo during the 24 h following administration. While onset of action of 1000 mg JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) was relatively slower compared with acetaminophen, its duration of action was sustained up to 24 h being superior beginning 7 h after administration. No clinically important differences among treatment groups in nature or severity of adverse events were observed and no serious adverse events were reported. Increased bilirubin, potentially due to UGT1A1 inhibition and ingestion of blood from oral surgery, was the most commonly reported adverse event and the only event reported by ≥ 5% of subjects across treatment groups. These data support further evaluation of JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT02209181.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of the Oral Decongestant Phenylephrine HCl in Children and Adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric data for phenylephrine, a decongestant used in cold medicines, are limited. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of phenylephrine HCl in children aged 2-17 years. METHODS: Forty-one children experiencing nasal congestion were dosed orally with phenylephrine HCl from 2.5 to 10 mg using a modified weight-age schedule. Plasma from blood samples collected up to 4.5 h after dosing was analyzed for phenylephrine. Urine collected over 24 h was analyzed for phenylephrine and metabolites. Blood pressure and pulse were measured after each blood sampling, and electrocardiograms were recorded before and after dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Mean phenylephrine total exposure (AUC∞) for children aged 2-5, 6-11, and 12-17 years was 672, 830, and 1020 pg∙h/mL, and mean maximum concentration (Cmax) was 477, 589, and 673 pg/mL, respectively. Times to peak concentration (Tmax) ranged from 0.17 to 1.5 h, and elimination half-life (t½,ß) was short from 1.2 to 1.6 h. Oral clearance (CL/F) increased with age, but with allometric scaling for body size, this trend reversed as scaled clearance (CL/F,scaled) was modestly higher in youngest children. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs or electrocardiograms were observed. CONCLUSION: A dosing schedule with additional weight-age increments would provide more consistent systemic concentrations as children age and receive the next higher dose. No developmental delays in clearance mechanisms were apparent when oral clearance was scaled for body size. Phenylephrine pharmacokinetics and metabolism were consistent with adult data, although AUC∞ for the youngest group and Cmax for all pediatric groups were lower. Single doses of phenylephrine HCl were well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clintrials.gov NCT00762567, registered 30 September 2008.

First-in-human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel analgesic and antipyretic drug with structural similarity to acetaminophen.

JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) is a new molecular entity that comprises structural similarities to acetaminophen and provides comparable analgesia in animals and humans without causing the hepatotoxicity associated with acetaminophen overdose in preclinical models. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) following single (50-6000 mg) and multiple (250-2500 mg twice daily for 8 days) doses in healthy male volunteers. JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) was absorbed within 1-3 h, except at high doses at which Cmax was delayed and bimodal, while increases in AUC were more than dose proportional. CL/F and Vd/F decreased approximately 3-fold with increasing single doses up to 6000 mg and multiple doses up to 1000 mg, resulting in similar t½ values that ranged from 8 to 10 h across doses. JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) was generally safe and well tolerated, and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Transient increases in indirect bilirubin were noted at post-baseline timepoints due to UGT1A1 inhibition, without any evidence of adverse hepatic effects. Macular rash and generalized erythema were the most common drug-related adverse events after multiple doses.

Testing and Psychometric Validation of a Pediatric Instrument to Self-Assess Symptoms of the Common Cold.

OBJECTIVES: Given the lack of validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments assessing cold symptoms, a new pediatric PRO instrument was developed to assess multiple cold symptoms: the Child Cold Symptom Questionnaire (CCSQ). The objective of this research was to evaluate the measurement properties of the CCSQ. METHODS: This observational study involved daily completion of the self-report CCSQ by children aged 6-11 years in their home for 7 days. These data were used to develop a scoring algorithm and item-scale structure and evaluate the psychometric properties of the resulting scores. Analyses included evaluation of item and dimensionality performance (item response distributions and confirmatory factor analysis) and assessment of test-retest reliability in stable patients, construct validity (convergent and known groups validity), and preliminary responsiveness. Qualitative exit interviews in a subgroup of the children with colds and their parents were conducted. RESULTS: More than 90% of children had no missing data during the testing period, reflecting an excellent completion rate. For most items, responses were distributed across the options, with approximately normal distributions. Test-retest reliability was adequate, with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.83. A logical pattern of correlations with the validated Strep-PRO instrument provided evidence supporting convergent validity. Single- and multi-item symptom scores distinguished between children who differed in their cold severity based on global ratings, providing evidence of known groups validity. Preliminary evidence indicates the CCSQ is responsive to changes over time. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that the CCSQ items and multi-item scores provide valid and reliable patient-reported measures of cold symptoms in children aged 6-11 years. They provide strong evidence supporting the validity of these items and multi-item scores for inclusion as endpoints in clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of cold medicines.

Development and Content Validity Testing of Patient-Reported Outcome Items for Children to Self-Assess Symptoms of the Common Cold.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: No pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments specific to the common cold are found in the literature. This study involved development and content validity testing of patient-reported outcome items (questions and response options) assessing cold symptoms in children aged 6-11 years. METHODS: Draft patient-reported outcome instructions, items, response scales, and recall periods were developed based on the literature and existing measures. Qualitative interviews were conducted with children (n = 39) who were currently (n = 31) or had recently (n = 8) experienced a cold and ten parents of a subset of children aged 6-8 years. The interviews were conducted over two rounds and included open-ended concept elicitation questioning, a free-drawing task, a card sorting task, and a task involving circling parts of the body, followed by cognitive debriefing of draft items. Thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts was performed to analyze the qualitative data. The findings were used to support revisions to the draft patient-reported outcome. RESULTS: Ten symptom concepts were reported by the children during concept elicitation. The creative tasks helped the children to describe their symptoms, generally using consistent language to do so, irrespective of age. Nineteen patient-reported outcome items were developed and subject to cognitive debriefing. Debriefing with both children and parents informed several small revisions and provided evidence that the majority of children found most patient-reported outcome items easy to understand, and that the items were mainly interpreted consistently and as intended. CONCLUSIONS: This in-depth qualitative study has supported identification of relevant symptom concepts and the development and refinement of patient-reported outcome items to assess those concepts. The findings support the content validity of the items and suggest that they can be used with confidence in children aged 9 years and older. For children aged 6-8 years, it is recommended the items are administered with initial adult supervision to explain the more difficult concepts or through parent/interviewer administration.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetic Study of Diphenhydramine HCl in Children and Adolescents.

Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics were characterized following a single oral dose in children aged 2 to 17 years using a weight- and age-based dosing schedule with more tiers than the current age-based dosing schedule recommended by the nonprescription drug monograph. This study was conducted in 42 subjects, aged 2 to 17 years. Doses were based on a weight-age dosing schedule, ranging from 6.25 to 50 mg. An oral dose was administered with water about 2 hours after a light breakfast. Plasma samples were obtained up to 48 hours after dosing and analyzed for diphenhydramine. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods, and the relationship of oral clearance with age was assessed using linear regression. Over an 8-fold range of doses, Cmax and AUC increased ∼90 % to ∼140% across age groups, with a similar Tmax (1.5 hours). Oral CL/F increased with age, but after allometric scaling, no maturation-related change in CL/F was apparent. Mild somnolence was the most commonly reported adverse event (95% of the subjects). A weight-age dosing schedule using an 8-fold range of doses achieved Cmax and AUC that increased about 2-fold across age groups. No effect of maturation on CL/F was observed after allometric scaling.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Acetaminophen Dosing Regimens in Febrile Infants and Children: A Report on 3 Legacy Studies.

OBJECTIVE: Compare efficacy and safety of 10 to 15 mg/kg with 20 to 30 mg/kg acetaminophen in febrile children 6 months to ≤ 11 years from 3 double-blind, randomized, single or multiple dose studies. METHODS: Doses were compared on sum of the temperature differences (SUMDIFF), maximum temperature difference (MAXDIFF), temperature differences at each time point, and dose by time interactions. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was evaluated in the 72-hour duration study. RESULTS: A single dose of acetaminophen 20 to 30 mg/kg produced a greater effect on temperature decrement and duration of antipyretic effect over 8 hours than a single dose of 10 to 15 mg/kg. When equivalent total doses (i.e., 2 doses of 10 to 15 mg/kg given at 4-hour intervals and 1 dose of 20 to 30 mg/kg) were given over the initial 8-hour period, there were no significant temperature differences. Over a 72-hour period, 10 to 15 mg/kg acetaminophen administered every 4 hours maintained a more consistent temperature decrement than 20 to 30 mg/kg acetaminophen administered every 8 hours. Following doses of 60 to 90 mg/kg/day for up to 72 hours, no child had a clinically important increase in ALT from baseline. The number of children with reported adverse events was similar between doses. CONCLUSIONS: Data demonstrate the antipyretic effect of acetaminophen is dependent on total dose over a given time interval. These 3 studies provide clinical evidence that the recommended standard acetaminophen dose of 10 to 15 mg/kg is a safe and effective dose for treating fever in pediatric patients when administered as a single dose or as multiple doses for up to 72 hours.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and cardiovascular tolerability of phenylephrine HCl 10, 20, and 30 mg after a single oral administration in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Phenylephrine HCl 10 mg has been used as a nasal decongestant for over 50 years, yet only limited pharmacokinetic and metabolic data are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of phenylephrine HCl 10, 20, and 30 mg and to assess cardiovascular tolerability compared with baseline and placebo in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-eight adults were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-treatment crossover study. Subjects remained housed for 6 days to permit time-matched, serial measurements of pulse, blood pressure, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) for baseline and complete treatments on consecutive days. After fasting overnight, subjects were dosed with oral phenylephrine HCl 10, 20, or 30 mg or placebo. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected over 7 h, whereas pulse, blood pressure, and ECGs were measured over 12 h. Urine was collected over each 24-h period to quantify phenylephrine and metabolites. RESULTS: After oral administration, phenylephrine was rapidly absorbed with median times to maximum plasma concentrations (t max) from 0.33 to 0.5 h. For phenylephrine HCl 10, 20, and 30 mg, the mean (standard deviation) maximum concentration (C max) was 1354 (954), 2959 (2122), and 4492 (1978) pg/mL, and total systemic exposure [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞)] was 955.8 (278.5), 2346 (983.8), and 3900 (1764) pg·h/mL, respectively. Both parameters increased disproportionally with increasing dose, as ß >1 in the power model. Negligible amounts of phenylephrine and phenylephrine glucuronide were excreted in urine. With increasing dose, percentages by dose of phenylephrine sulfate decreased, whereas percentages of 3-hydroxymandelic acid increased. Eight subjects reported nine mild adverse events; one (somnolence) was deemed to be treatment related. Means of time-matched differences in pulse and blood pressure from baseline showed similar fluctuations over 12 h among phenylephrine HCl doses and placebo, although small differences in systolic pressure were observed during the initial 2 h. No apparent dose-related effects were observed for Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) values, and individual changes from time-matched baseline (DQTcF). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum and total systemic exposures following singe doses of phenylephrine HCl 10, 20, and 30 mg increased disproportionally with increasing dose. Safety and cardiovascular tolerability were comparable among doses and placebo.

Front-line ownership: generating a cure mindset for patient safety.

Great advances have been made in standardization and human factors engineering that have reduced variability and increased reliability in healthcare. As important as these advances are, the authors believe there is another important but largely ignored layer to the safety story in healthcare that has prevented us from progressing. In the field of infection prevention and control (IPAC), despite great attempts over several decades to improve compliance with hand hygiene, surveillance, environmental cleaning, isolation protocols and other control measures, very significant challenges remain. We believe this failure is in part due to the power gradients, often dysfunctional relationships and lack of safety mindfulness that exist in hospitals and healthcare more generally. Furthermore, safety culture requires different approaches and considerable ongoing attentiveness. If this is the case, and the authors contend in this paper that it is, then the role of the front line is much more important than many of our healthcare safety and IPAC approaches suggest.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of acetaminophen 1000 mg versus acetaminophen 650 mg for the treatment of postsurgical dental pain.

BACKGROUND: Although acetaminophen is one of the oldest and most widely used of all analgesic drugs, the incremental benefit of the 1000-mg dose compared with the 650-mg dose has been questioned. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg versus acetaminophen 650 mg over a 6-hour period in patients experiencing at least moderate postsurgical dental pain. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study enrolled patients aged 16 to 50 years who experienced at least moderate pain after surgical removal of impacted third molars. Each patient received either acetaminophen 1000 mg (n = 239), acetaminophen 650 mg (n = 241), or placebo (n = 60) when they had at least moderate pain and a score ≥50 on the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) postsurgically. Pain intensity and pain relief were measured over 6 hours (VAS 0-100 mm). RESULTS: All 540 patients (52% female; age range, 16-30 years; 95% white) were included in the efficacy analysis. For the primary efficacy endpoint (weighted sum of the pain intensity difference from baseline [PID] and pain relief [PAR] scores over 6 hours [SPRID6]), acetaminophen 1000 mg demonstrated a 24% improvement compared with acetaminophen 650 mg (529.4 vs 427.3; P = 0.001). In addition, acetaminophen 650 mg was significantly superior compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The weighted sum of PID over 6 hours (SPID6), the weighted total pain relief over 6 hours (TOTPAR6), and the percentage of patients with >50% of the maximum possible TOTPAR6 score were significantly greater for patients treated with acetaminophen 1000 mg compared with those receiving acetaminophen 650 mg (P ≤ 0.006) or placebo (P < 0.001) and for patients treated with acetaminophen 650 mg compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Time to rescue, rescue rates through 4 and 6 hours, and patient global assessment demonstrated similar findings. Patients treated with acetaminophen 1000 mg or 650 mg had a significantly different distribution in times to confirmed perceptible and meaningful pain relief compared with those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Adverse events were reported by 18.5% of patients, with no clinically important difference between active treatment groups and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Acetaminophen 1000 mg provided clinically meaningful and statistically significantly greater efficacy in treating postsurgical dental pain compared with acetaminophen 650 mg and placebo. The outcomes of this study are limited to the single-dose design of this study. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01115673.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of an ibuprofen-pseudoephedrine cold suspension in children.

Two studies were conducted to characterize multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and potential drug interactions of ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine combined in a suspension and to evaluate safety of this combination in children with common cold, flu, or sinusitis. In the pharmacokinetic study, 24 healthy children aged 4-11 years were administered ibuprofen -pseudoephedrine suspension at 7.5 and 1.125 mg/kg, respectively, every 6 hours for 5 doses. Serial blood samples were drawn over 6 hours after final dose for assessment of steady-state pharmacokinetics. In the open-label, multicenter safety study, more than 100 children aged 2-11 years experiencing symptomatic rhinitis were enrolled. Ibuprofen -pseudoephedrine suspension was administered as needed at similar mg/kg doses every 6-8 hours for up to 3 days. Subjects enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study showed no accumulation of either drug; their weight-adjusted clearances were independent of age, and results were comparable with those from previous single-ingredient studies. For ibuprofen, oral clearance (Cl/F) was 77.5 + or - 16.4 mL/kg/h and volume of distribution (Vd/F) was 0.147 + or - 0.037 L/kg. For pseudoephedrine, Cl/F was 12.3 + or - 2.2 mL/kg/min and Vd/F was 2.52 + or - 0.47 L/kg. In the safety study, adverse events were reported for 18.4% of subjects; most were mild to moderate intensity. There was little difference in incidence of adverse events among different age and weight groups. In conclusion, administration of combined ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine in children demonstrated similar pharmacokinetics when compared with reports of the pharmacokinetics for the single-ingredient products, consistent with no apparent drug interactions. The combination suspension was generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate (Concerta; McNeil Pediatrics Division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Titusville, NJ) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. METHODS: A randomized, 7-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, parallel-group study of OROS methylphenidate 36, 54, 72, 90, or 108 mg/d versus placebo was conducted in adults with ADHD. The primary end point was the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale. Other assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, a post hoc responder analysis, adverse events, and vital signs. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six subjects (56.2% male; mean age, 39.0 years; range, 18-65 years) were included in the intention-to-treat population (110 subjects on OROS methylphenidate; 116 subjects on placebo). OROS methylphenidate resulted in greater ADHD symptom improvement than placebo as demonstrated by a statistically significantly lower least squares mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale total score at the final visit (last observation carried forward [LOCF]; P = 0.012). Subjects on OROS methylphenidate also had a significantly lower least squares mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score at the final visit (LOCF; P = 0.008). A significantly greater proportion of subjects on OROS methylphenidate (36.9%, 38/103 subjects) were responders at the final visit (LOCF) compared with placebo (20.9%, 24/115 subjects; P = 0.009). OROS methylphenidate was well tolerated. Adverse events were reported by 93 (84.5%) of the 110 OROS methylphenidate-treated subjects versus 74 (63.8%) of the 116 placebo-treated subjects. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events and no deaths were reported. Similar mean changes from baseline to final visit (LOCF) for systolic and diastolic blood pressures for the OROS methylphenidate and placebo groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a dose escalation ranging from 36 to 108 mg/d, OROS methylphenidate is effective and well tolerated in the management of ADHD in adults.

An analysis of patient adherence to treatment during a 1-year, open-label study of OROS methylphenidate in children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment adherence is an important aspect of ADHD symptom management, but there are many factors that may influence adherence. METHOD: This analysis assessed adherence to OROS methylphenidate during a 1-year, open-label study in children. Adherence was defined as the number of days medication was taken divided by the number of days in the study and determined to be high if > or =75%. Possible clinical and demographic factors associated with adherence, including use of planned medication breaks, were assessed. RESULTS: Mean adherence was 86.4%. It was 91.6% for the subgroup of patients who reported not taking planned medication breaks (n = 252) and 77.7% for the subgroup taking planned medication breaks (n = 155). Overall, 75% of patients showed high adherence. Older age, low starting dose, minority ethnic status, and fewer ADHD symptoms were associated with low adherence. CONCLUSION: Various factors were found to be associated with low adherence, and the results of this analysis provide guidance to physicians seeking to identify those patients with ADHD most likely not be adherent to stimulant therapy

Does prolonged therapy with a long-acting stimulant suppress growth in children with ADHD?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether prolonged therapy with a long-acting stimulant affects growth in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: One hundred seventy-eight children ages 6 to 13 years received OROS methylphenidate (OROS MPH, CONCERTA) for at least 21 months. Height and weight were measured monthly during the first year and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: At baseline, subjects were approximately the expected height for their age and somewhat heavier than expected. Subjects gained height steadily throughout the study and were on average 0.23 cm less than expected at month 21. Weight did not increase and BMI decreased slightly in the first 4 months. Thereafter, weight Z score and BMI Z score remained relatively constant and children were on average 1.23 kg less than expected at month 21. Previous stimulant therapy tended to be associated with a smaller decrease in Z score during the study compared with no previous stimulant therapy. Drug holidays did not significantly affect growth. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of prolonged OROS MPH therapy on growth were clinically insignificant and limited to slight decreases in weight during the first months of therapy. Drug holidays did not reduce any impact on growth and are thus of questionable utility for limiting potential effects of treatment on growth.

Multisite controlled study of OROS methylphenidate in the treatment of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: Despite the persistence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into adolescence, little is known about the efficacy and tolerability of stimulant medications in this age group. OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a multisite controlled study among adolescents with ADHD evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of osmotic-release oral system (OROS) methylphenidate. DESIGN: Adolescents (N = 220) having a confirmed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of ADHD underwent dose titration to identify dosages of OROS methylphenidate that improved symptoms to predefined criteria. Subjects successfully completing the dose titration phase (n = 177) (ie, tolerated and responded to treatment and adhered to the protocol) were randomized to receive 2 weeks' treatment with their individualized dosage of OROS methylphenidate (18, 36, 54, or 72 mg once daily) or placebo. Treatment effectiveness was measured using investigator, parent, and adolescent assessments of ADHD. RESULTS: A significant reduction from baseline in the investigator-rated ADHD Rating Scale, the primary efficacy measure, was found with OROS methylphenidate treatment compared with placebo. Similar findings were noted with parent- and adolescent-report measures. Based on a Clinical Global Impression improvement subscale score of much or very much improved, 52% of subjects in the OROS methylphenidate group improved compared with 31% receiving placebo. Thirty-seven percent of subjects required the maximum dosage of 72 mg/d. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSION: In adolescents, once-daily OROS methylphenidate significantly reduced ADHD symptoms and was well tolerated using dosages up to 72 mg/d.

Correspondence of parent and teacher reports in medication trials.

Although much has been written about the agreement of parents and teachers regarding the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), some uncertainty remains about their agreement when assessing change during drug treatment. To address this issue, we analyzed data from a placebo-controlled short-term study and an open-label long-term study of ADHD children treated with OROS methylphenidate (MPH). Both reporters agreed that OROS MPH was efficacious for symptoms of inattention/overactivity and oppositionality/defiance and that the effect was greater for inattention/overactivity than oppositionality/defiance. Thus, in clinical trials, having two reports may not be absolutely essential for assessing the efficacy of ADHD medications. We also computed diagnostic efficiency statistics and found a high probability that parents would confirm teacher reports of therapeutic improvement and a somewhat lower probability that teachers would confirm parent reports of therapeutic improvement. In contrast, neither reporter was likely to confirm the other reporter's report of no improvement or worsening. Thus, when given a report of no improvement from one setting, clinicians cannot be certain about clinical status in the other setting. For symptoms of oppositionality and defiance, we also saw that parent- teacher agreement about improvement was better than agreement about lack of improvement. However, for these symptoms, teacher reports were somewhat better predictors of parent reports than vice-versa.

Merger as marriage: communication issues in postmerger integration.

Many health care organizations have found themselves involved in mergers, acquisitions, alliances, networks, and other forms of structural change in order to reduce costs, improve utilization and service breadth, increase market leverage, and reduce variation in demand. This article examines three levels of communication issues that interact with one another and impact the likelihood of successful postmerger integration: affect, discursive frame, and negotiating position.