Centre effect on treatment outcome for patients with untreated acute myelogenous leukaemia? An analysis of the AML 8A Study of the Leukemia Cooperative Group of the EORTC and GIMEMA. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Leukemia Cooperative Group and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA).

In the AML 8A study patients were treated with remission-induction therapy followed by one consolidation course. Patients in complete remission (CR) were randomised between autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and a second intensive consolidation course, except for those with a histocompatible sibling donor, who received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). This analysis was performed to determine whether centres which only performed induction and consolidation therapy, achieved similar results as centres who also performed transplantation. 542/676 (80%) from transplantation centres and 150/194 (77%) from referring centres achieved CR, with an early death rate of 5% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.01). 66% of patients with a donor from transplantation centres received alloBMT in first CR compared with 57% from referring centres (P = 0.2). Transplantation centres randomised 64% of patients without a donor, referring centres 47% (P = 0.04). The full protocol treatment was completed by 275/542 (51%) and 61/150 (41%) patients, respectively (P = 0.04). The overall survival rate at 6 years from diagnosis was 34% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.9). In conclusion, the type of centre did not appear to have an influence on overall survival. The feasibility of the study was acceptable for both types of centres. The referring centres applied more selection for transplantation. Despite a more intensive second-line treatment at transplantation centres, the overall outcome remained similar to that of referring centres.

The influence of HLA-matched sibling donor availability on treatment outcome for patients with AML: an analysis of the AML 8A study of the EORTC Leukaemia Cooperative Group and GIMEMA. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto.

To determine whether patients with a HLA-identical sibling donor have a better outcome than patients without a donor, an analysis on the basis of intention-to-treat principles was performed within the framework of the EORTC-GIMEMA randomized phase III AML 8A trial. Patients in complete remission (CR) received one intensive consolidation course. Patients with a histocompatible sibling donor were then allocated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT), the patients without a donor were randomized between autologous BMT (ABMT) and a second intensive consolidation (IC2). 831 patients <46 years old and alive >8 weeks from diagnosis were included. HLA typing was performed in 672 patients. AlloBMT was performed during CR1 in 180 (61%) out of 295 patients with a donor. Another 38 patients were allografted: five in resistant disease, 14 during relapse and 19 in CR2. ABMT was performed in 130 (34%) out of 377 patients without a donor in CR1, in six (2%) patients during relapse and in 38 (10%) patients during CR2. The disease-free survival (DFS) from CR for patients with a donor was significantly longer than for patients without a donor (46% v 33% at 6 years; P=0.01, RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.96). The overall survival from diagnosis for patients with a donor was longer, but not statistically significant, than for patients without a donor (48% v 40% at 6 years; logrank P=0.24). When patients were stratified according to prognostic risk groups, the same trend in favour of patients with a donor was seen for survival duration and the DFS remained significantly longer for this group of patients.

Prognostic factors of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) allografted in first complete remission: an analysis of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML 8A trial. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell' Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups.

The Leukemia Cooperative Groups of the EORTC and the GIMEMA conducted a prospective randomized phase III trial, in order to assess the value of autologous BMT (ABMT) vs a second intensive consolidation course (IC2), following a common intensive consolidation course (IC1) for patients with AML. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were not randomized, but were included in an allogeneic BMT (alloBMT) program. This is an analysis of prognostic factors which influence the outcome of treatment after alloBMT in first complete remission (CR). The study included 730 patients < 46 years of age in CR, 270 having a histocompatible sibling donor. In 169 of these patients alloBMT was performed in first CR. Early remitters (122 patients achieving CR with one course of treatment) had a DFS at 3 years of 67%, significantly longer than that of 44% for late remitters (47 patients achieving CR after more than one course of treatment) (P = 0.006). The relapse risk for early vs late remitters was 16 and 40% at 3 years (P = 0.001) and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 2 years was 21 vs 27%. Age appeared to be a prognostic factor for TRM, WBC for DFS, whereas the FAB classification was not of prognostic importance. Patients with poor risk cytogenetic abnormalities showed a trend towards a higher relapse risk. Patients transplanted shortly after achieving CR appeared to have a worse prognosis than those transplanted further into remission. Overall, the number of courses of induction therapy needed to achieve CR was the most important prognostic factor for outcome after allogeneic BMT.

Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive consolidation chemotherapy are used to treat acute myelogenous leukemia in a first complete remission. METHODS: After induction treatment with daunorubicin and cytarabine, patients who had a complete remission received a first course of intensive consolidation chemotherapy, combining intermediate-dose cytarabine and amsacrine. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation; the others were randomly assigned to undergo autologous bone marrow transplantation (with unpurged bone marrow) or a second course of intensive chemotherapy, combining high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. Comparisons were made on the basis of the intention to treat. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients had a complete remission; 168 were assigned to undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, and 254 were randomly assigned to one of the other two groups. Of these patients, 343 completed the treatment assignment: 144 in the allogeneic-transplantation group, 95 in the autologous-transplantation group, and 104 in the intensive-chemotherapy group. The relapse rate was highest in the intensive-chemotherapy group and lowest in the allogeneic-transplantation group, whereas the mortality rate was highest after allogeneic transplantation and lowest after intensive chemotherapy. The projected rate of disease-free survival at four years was 55 percent for allogeneic transplantation, 48 percent for autologous transplantation, and 30 percent for intensive chemotherapy. However, the overall survival after complete remission was similar in the three groups, since more patients who relapsed after a second course of intensive chemotherapy had a response to subsequent autologous bone marrow transplantation. Other differences were also observed, especially with regard to hematopoietic recovery (it occurred later after autologous transplantation) and the duration of hospitalization (it was longer with bone marrow transplantation). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous as well as allogeneic bone marrow transplantation results in better disease-free survival than intensive consolidation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. Transplantation soon after a relapse or during a second complete remission might also be appropriate.

High-dose cytarabine in acute leukemia: toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

High-dose cytarabine (HDARA-C) at doses ranging from 1000 to 3000 mg/m2 administered as 30-min iv infusions was used in 12 patients with acute leukemia. HDARA-C toxicity was marked by nausea, vomiting, and somnolence; fever occurred in one patient. Myelosuppression was brief and reversible; the wbc count nadir occurred between Days 10 and 15 after treatment. In this study of a limited number of patients, no reliable conclusions could be drawn about antileukemic activity. However, (a) HDARA-C appeared to be a well-tolerated regimen in acute myeloblastic leukemia in complete remission; (b) a clear improvement was obtained in a patient with central nervous system leukemia; and (c) a sharp but transient decrease in peripheral blast cell counts was seen in two patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia. Cytarabine distribution was bi- or tri-compartmental; plasma final half-life was greater than 4 hrs in six patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not correlated with serum deoxycytidine deaminase activity. HDARA-C crosses the blood-brain barrier and may be useful in the prophylaxis against and treatment of central nervous system leukemia.