RESUMO
We report a case of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) in a postoperative cardiac surgery patient after the administration of typical and atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of delirium. On postoperative day 8, the patient's temperature peaked at 40.6°C. Agitation, rigidity, elevation in creatine kinase, and leukocytosis were associated findings. NMS was suspected on postoperative day 10. All antipsychotics were discontinued; dantrolene infusions and fluid therapy were initiated. After 2 days of NMS treatment, the patient's symptoms resolved. The temporal relationship between discontinuation of all antipsychotics, initiation of dantrolene, and clinical improvement supports the diagnosis of antipsychotic-induced NMS.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Maligna Neuroléptica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Maligna Neuroléptica/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeAssuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Idoso , Mortalidade Hospitalar , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The operating room (OR) is a highly social and hierarchical setting where interprofessional team members must work interdependently under pressure. Due primarily to methodological challenges, the social and behavioral sciences have had trouble offering insight into OR dynamics. PURPOSE: We adopted a method from the field of ethology for observing and quantifying the interpersonal interactions of OR team members. METHODS: We created and refined an ethogram, a catalog of all our subjects' observable social behaviors. The ethogram was then assessed for its feasibility and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: It was feasible to use an ethogram to gather data in the OR. The high interobserver reliability (Cohen's Kappa coefficients of 81 % and higher) indicates its utility for yielding largely objective, descriptive, quantitative data on OR behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The method we propose has potential for social research conducted in healthcare settings as complex as the OR.
Assuntos
Etologia/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Relações Interpessoais , Salas Cirúrgicas , Comportamento Social , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
The death penalty by lethal injection is a legal punishment in the United States. Sodium Thiopental, once used in the death penalty cocktail, is no longer available for use in the United States as a consequence of this association. Anesthesiologists possess knowledge of Sodium Thiopental and possible chemical alternatives. Further, lethal injection has the look and feel of a medical act thereby encouraging physician participation and comment. Concern has been raised that the death penalty by lethal injection, is cruel. Physicians are ethically directed to prevent cruelty within the doctor-patient relationship and ethically prohibited from participation in any component of the death penalty. The US Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not cruel per se and is not in conflict with the 8th amendment of the US constitution. If the death penalty is not cruel, it requires no further refinement. If, on the other hand, the death penalty is in fact cruel, physicians have no mandate outside of the doctor patient relationship to reduce cruelty. Any intervention in the name of cruelty reduction, in the setting of lethal injection, does not lead to a more humane form of punishment. If physicians contend that the death penalty can be botched, they wrongly direct that it can be improved. The death penalty cocktail, as a method to reduce suffering during execution, is an unverifiable claim. At best, anesthetics produce an outward appearance of calmness only and do not address suffering as a consequence of the anticipation of death on the part of the condemned.