The patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS®) physical function and its derivative measures in adults: a systematic review of content validity.

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review and critically appraise the content validity of the adult versions of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) item bank and its derivative measures in any adult population. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in October 2021 for studies on measurement properties of PROMIS-PF measures in an adult population. Studies were included if the study described the development of a PROMIS-PF measure or investigated its relevance, comprehensiveness, or comprehensibility. Assessment of the methodological quality of eligible studies, rating of results, and summarizing evidence was performed following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for assessing content validity. A modified GRADE approach was used to determine the level of evidence. RESULTS: Three development studies and eight studies on the content validity of one or more of the PROMIS-PF measures were identified. The methodological quality of most studies was rated doubtful. There was low to high level evidence for sufficient relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of most PROMIS-PF measures for healthy seniors and various disease populations. We found low to moderate level evidence for insufficient relevance of PROMIS-PF measures for patients with conditions that affected only one body part, and insufficient comprehensibility of the PROMIS-PF measures for minority elderly. CONCLUSION: Most PROMIS-PF measures demonstrate sufficient content validity in healthy seniors and various disease populations. However, the quality of this evidence is generally low to moderate, due to limitations in the methodological quality of the studies.

Reducing the Number of Test Items of the Action Research Arm Test Poststroke: A Decision Tree Analysis✰.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to create a shorter version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) without compromising its measurement properties. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of stroke recovery cohorts that used the ARAT to measure upper limb impairment. SETTING: Rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke from 5 different stroke recovery cohorts (N=1425). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A decision tree version of the ARAT (ARAT-DT) was developed using chi-square automated interaction detection. In an independent validation subset, criterion validity, agreement of ARAT-DT with original ARAT scores and score categories, and construct validity with the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale score were determined. RESULTS: In total, 3738 ARAT measurements were available involving 1425 subjects. Chi-square automated interaction detection analysis in the development subset (n=2803) revealed an optimized decision tree with a maximum of 4 consecutive items. In the validation data set (n=935), the ARAT-DT differed by a mean of 0.19 points (0.3% of the total scale) from the original ARAT scores (limits of agreement=-5.67 to 6.05). The ARAT-DT demonstrated excellent criterion validity with the original ARAT scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.99 and ρ=0.99) and scoring categories (κw=0.97). The ARAT-DT showed very good construct validity with the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (ρ=0.92). CONCLUSION: A decision tree version of the ARAT was developed, reducing the maximum number of items necessary for ARAT administration from 19 to 4. The scores produced by the decision tree had excellent criterion validity with original ARAT scores.

Experiences with information provision and preferences for decision making of patients with acute stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to gain insight into experiences of patients with acute stroke regarding information provision and their preferred involvement in decision-making processes during the initial period of hospitalisation. METHODS: A sequential explanatory design was used in two independent cohorts of patients with stroke, starting with a survey after discharge from hospital (cohort 1) followed by observations and structured interviews during hospitalisation (cohort 2). Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 72 patients participated in this study (52 in cohort 1 and 20 in cohort 2). During hospitalisation, the majority of the patients were educated about acute stroke and their treatment. Approximately half of the patients preferred to have an active role in the decision-making process, whereas only 21% reported to be actively involved. In cohort 2, 60% of the patients considered themselves capable to carefully consider treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Active involvement in the acute decision-making process is preferred by approximately half of the patients with acute stroke and most of them consider themselves capable of doing so. However, they experience a limited degree of actual involvement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Physicians can facilitate patient engagement by explicitly emphasising when a decision has to be made in which the patient's opinion is important.