Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 494, 2024 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926741

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Autologous iliac bone is commonly used as a bone graft material to achieve solid fusion in craniocervical junction (CVJ) surgery. However, the developing iliac bone of children is less than ideal as a bone graft material. The matured rib bone of children presents a potential substitute material for iliac bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of autologous rib grafts for craniocervical junction surgery in children. METHODS: The outcomes of 10 children with abnormalities of the craniocervical junction who underwent craniocervical junction surgery between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent posterior fusion and internal fixation surgery with autologous rib grafts. Pre- and post-operative images were obtained and clinical follow-ups were conducted to evaluate neurological function, pain level, donor site complications, and bone fusion rates. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful. During the 8- to 24-month follow-up period, all patients achieved satisfactory clinical results. Computed tomography at 3-6 months confirmed successful bone fusion and regeneration of the rib defect in all patients with no neurological or donor site complications. CONCLUSION: Autologous rib bone is a safe and effective material for bone grafting in craniocervical junction fusion surgery for children that can reduce the risks of donor site complications and increase the amount of bone graft, thereby achieving a higher bone fusion rate.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo , Costelas , Fusão Vertebral , Transplante Autólogo , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Costelas/transplante , Costelas/cirurgia , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Articulação Atlantoaxial/cirurgia , Articulação Atlantoaxial/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação Atlantoccipital/cirurgia , Articulação Atlantoccipital/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Eur Spine J ; 33(8): 3043-3048, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750099

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and evaluate the preliminary clinical application of this forceps in assisting simple posterior screw-rod system reduction and fixation in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. METHODS: Based on the posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod system, posterior reduction forceps was developed to assist simple posterior screw-rod system for the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. From January 2021 to October 2022, 10 cases with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation were treated with this technique. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was applied before and after surgery to evaluate the neurological status of the patient, and the Atlanto-dental interval (ADI) was measured before and after surgery to evaluate the atlantoaxial reduction. X-ray and CT were performed to evaluate internal fixation, atlantoaxial sequence and bone graft fusion during regular follow-up. MRI was performed to evaluate the status of atlantoaxial reduction and spinal cord compression after surgery. RESULTS: All 10 patients were successfully operated, and there were no complications such as spinal nerve and vascular injury. Postoperative clinical symptoms were significantly relieved in all patients, and postoperative JOA score and ADI were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The developed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation can assist the simple posterior screw-rod system in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation to avoid the release in anterior or posterior approach and reduce the difficulty of surgery. The preliminary results of this technique are satisfactory and it has a good application prospect.


Assuntos
Articulação Atlantoaxial , Luxações Articulares , Humanos , Articulação Atlantoaxial/cirurgia , Articulação Atlantoaxial/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Parafusos Ósseos , Adulto Jovem , Resultado do Tratamento , Adolescente
3.
Neurospine ; 21(2): 544-554, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317544

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis. METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA