Morbidity and Mortality of Very-Low-Birthweight Twin Infants according to Their Sex and the Sex of the Co-Twin: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of male disadvantage regarding the prognosis of premature newborns was introduced more than half a century ago, and it has been corroborated over time. However, the influence of the sex of one twin on the outcomes of the other has yielded contradictory results. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if, in twin pregnancies of VLBW infants, the outcomes of one twin are modified by the sex of the co-twin. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study of a cohort of infants admitted to the collaborating units of the Spanish SEN1500 neonatal network was conducted. Liveborn VLBW twin infants, from 23+0 to 31+6 weeks of gestational age (GA), admitted from 2011 to 2020 were included. Outborn patients, infants with major congenital anomalies, and cases with only one twin admitted were excluded. The main outcomes were survival until first hospital discharge, survival without moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), survival without major brain damage (MBD), and survival without major morbidity. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: 2,111 twin pairs were included. Male infants exhibited worse outcomes than females (IRR; 95% CI) regarding survival (0.96; 0.94, 0.98), survival without moderate or severe BPD (0.89; 0.86, 0.93), survival without MBD (0.94; 0.91, 0.97), and survival without major morbidity (0.87; 0.81, 0.93). Differences disappeared when the co-twin was a female infant: survival (1.00; 0.97, 1.03), survival without moderate or severe BPD (0.96; 0.91, 1.01), survival without MBD (0.99; 0.95, 1.04), and survival without major morbidity (0.94; 0.85, 1.03). Results for female infants did not change significantly with co-twin sex. CONCLUSIONS: Among VLBW twins from 23+0 to 31+6 weeks of GA, male infants have higher risk of morbidity and mortality overall. In cases of pregnancies with different-sex foetuses, males seem to improve their results, while these do not change for females. The underlying mechanism of this influence deserves further investigation.

Survival and Survival without Major Morbidity Seem to Be Consistently Better throughout Gestational Age in 24- to 30-Week Gestational Age Very-Low-Birth-Weight Female Infants Compared to Males.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies showed advantages in outcomes for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) female infants. It has been suggested that recent advances in perinatal care might have benefited boys relatively more than girls, making differences disappear. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were (1) to determine if sex differences in survival and survival without morbidity in VLBW infants are still present in the context of more advanced perinatal care and (2) to know whether these differences are consistent throughout gestational age (GA). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in seven countries participating in the Spanish SEN1500 and the South American NEOCOSUR neonatal networks. We included VLBW infants 24-30 weeks' GA, born alive without major congenital anomalies (2013-2016). Major morbidity, survival, and survival without morbidity were compared between male and female infants overall and stratified by GA. RESULTS: 10,565 patients were included: 5,620 (53.2%) males and 4,945 (46.8%) females. Female infants exhibited a lower incidence rate ratio (95% CI) of respiratory distress syndrome: 0.91 (0.88, 0.94), necrotizing enterocolitis: 0.83 (0.74, 0.93), major brain damage: 0.79 (0.72, 0.86), moderate-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD): 0.77 (0.72, 0.83), higher survival: 1.03 (1.01, 1.05), survival without BPD: 1.11 (1.07, 1.16), survival without major brain damage: 1.05 (1.02, 1.08), and survival without major morbidity: 1.14 (1.07, 1.21). Survival and survival without morbidity were almost consistently favourable to females throughout GA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that perinatal results continue to be favourable for VLBW female infants in the context of current perinatology, and that they are almost consistent throughout GA.

Factors Associated with Survival and Survival without Major Morbidity in Very Preterm Infants in Two Neonatal Networks: SEN1500 and NEOCOSUR.

INTRODUCTION: Very low-birth weight (VLBW) infants represent a high-risk population for morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period. Variability in practices and outcomes between centers has been acknowledged. Multicenter benchmarking studies are useful to detect areas of improvement and constitute an interesting research tool. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the perinatal variables and interventions associated with survival and survival without major morbidity in VLBW infants and compare the performance of 2 large networks. METHODS: This is a prospective study analyzing data collected in 2 databases, the Spanish SEN1500 and the South American NEOCOSUR networks, from January 2013 to December 2016. Inborn patients, from 240 to 306 weeks of gestational age (GA) were included. Hazard ratios for survival and survival without major morbidity until the first hospital discharge or transfer to another facility were studied by using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 10,565 patients, 6,120 (57.9%) from SEN1500 and 4,445 (42.1%) from NEOCOSUR, respectively, were included. In addition to GA, birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), female sex, and multiple gestation, less invasive resuscitation, and the network of origin were significant independent factors influencing survival (aHR [SEN1500 vs. NEOCOSUR]: 1.20 [95% CI: 1.15-1.26] and survival without major morbidity: 1.34 [95% CI: 1.26-1.43]). Great variability in outcomes between centers was also found within each network. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for covariates, GA, birth weight, SGA, female sex, multiple gestation, less invasive resuscitation, and the network of origin showed an independent effect on outcomes. Determining the causes of these differences deserves further study.

Presenting Features and Prognosis of Ischemic and Nonischemic Neonatal Liver Failure.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological features, clinical characteristics and outcomes of neonates diagnosed with liver failure, as well as determine prognostic factors. METHODS: Cohort study conducted at a single tertiary referral and university-affiliated pediatric center. Hospital records of all neonates diagnosed with liver failure between January 2003 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed, and data on clinical and laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) and Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors at diagnosis. Liver failure diagnosis was established using the pediatric acute liver failure study group's diagnostic criteria for every patient with coagulopathy and biochemical pattern of liver disease. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. In our series, most cases were secondary to ischemia (28.9%). Other causes were neonatal hemochromatosis (17.8%), viral infections (13.3%), and inborn errors of metabolism (13.3%). A total 55.6% (25/45) of the patients died (median age: 16 days; range 1-235 days). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at diagnosis was associated with higher mortality or the need for liver transplantation on day 21 after diagnosis (P = .006). For every 500 IU/L increase in ALT serum levels, the mortality/liver transplantation rate increased 1.3 times (hazard ratio 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.6). Although ischemic neonatal acute liver failure presents with higher ALT levels, these cases appear to have better outcomes. Higher international normalized ratio tended to increase mortality/transplantation (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.2). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal liver failure should perhaps be considered in the differential diagnoses of any coagulopathy. ALT and international normalized ratio levels at diagnosis could predict prognosis in the short term. Ischemic liver failure appears to have a better prognosis.