Undiagnosed prediabetes status is associated with a reduced effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with erectile dysfunction.

The efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and undiagnosed prediabetes (PreDM) has been scantly analysed. We aimed to assess rates of and predictors of response to oral treatment in a cohort of ED men naïve for PDE5i with either normo-glycaemia or PreDM or diabetes mellitus (DM). Complete data from 466 men were analysed. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and after 3 months of PDE5i treatment. Treatment response was evaluated using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (mild: +2; moderate: +5; severe: +7 from baseline IIEF-EF). PreDM status was defined as for the American Diabetes Association (2015) criteria. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical predictors and MCID response. Overall, 253 (56.7%), 105 (23.5%) and 88 (19.7%) patients had normo-glycaemia (=controls), PreDM and DM, respectively. Diabetic and PreDM men were older, had higher BMI, higher CCI scores and lower total testosterone (tT) (all p < 0.01) compared to controls. Median baseline IIEF-EF was lower both in PreDM (14.0 vs. 18.0; p < 0.05) and DM patients (10.0 vs. 18.0; p < 0.001) than in controls. IIEF-EF improved in all groups after treatment (all p < 0.001), but scores were higher in controls compared to both PreDM and DM men at 3-mos assessment (26.0 vs. 20.0 vs. 17.5, respectively; all p < 0.001). Controls more frequently achieved significant MCID than both PreDM and DM patients (65.3 vs. 22.9 vs. 11.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Age (p < 0.001), baseline IIEF-EF (p < 0.001), and DM status (p = 0.02) were independently associated with MCID. In conclusion, patients with undiagnosed PreDM depicted lower rates of response to PDE5i than normoglycemic men. These findings suggest that even milder forms of glucose impairment are associated with a poorer PDE5i effectiveness in men with ED.

Clinical Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Under Either Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients who require surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia are under either anticoagulation (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and morbidity of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) in patients who required AC/AP therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included 296 (67.6%) and 142 (32.4%) patients who underwent HoLEP and B-TUEP, respectively. The AC/AP group included patients whose AP therapy was not interrupted pre-, peri-, and/or postoperatively, and patients who underwent perioperative AC therapy bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin. INTERVENTION: HoLEP and B-TUEP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We tested the hypothesis that AC/AP therapy had a limited impact on the efficacy of HoLEP and B-TUEP. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity-score matching was performed. Clinical characteristics were compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between clinical variables and the odds of Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications after surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 28 (9.5%) and 46 (15.5%) patients in the HoLEP group and 15 (10.5%) and 24 (16.9%) men in the B-TUEP group had AC and AP therapy, respectively (p=0.9). HoLEP patients under either AC or AP therapy deserved longer catheter maintenance and a longer hospital stay (HS) than those without AC/AP therapy (all p≤0.01). Operative time, rates of postoperative complications, and 2-mo International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) were similar between patients with and without AC/CP. Among B-TUEP patients, HS was longer (p=0.03) and the rate of complications was higher (p<0.001) in patients under AC or AP therapy. Postoperative haemoglobin drop and 2-mo IPSS were similar among groups and surgical techniques. Limitations are the retrospective nature of the study, and the lack of long-term complications and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP and B-TUEP can safely be performed in patients deserving continuous AP/AC therapy with only a slight increase in HS and catheterisation time. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed the safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) in men under chronic anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. Both HoLEP and B-TUEP could safely be performed as minimally invasive treatment options in this subset of patients at a high risk of bleeding from benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery.