Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Dermatol ; 68(4): 488, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37822407

RESUMO

The study of antimicrobial-resistant Propionibacterium acnes was not conducted regularly, especially in Indonesia. Conversely, regular monitoring of antibiotic efficacy through in vitro testing to assess the evolution of current resistance patterns is obligated; thus, filling the gap caused by a lack of appropriate antibiotic surveillance is required. Analyse the correlation between resistance patterns of P. acnes to doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin and azithromycin with the severity of acne vulgaris. This is an analytic observational laboratory study with a cross-sectional design of mild to severe acne vulgaris (AV) patients. Specimens were obtained from comedones of 71 patients, which were cultured and identified using biochemical examination. Antimicrobial resistance (doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin and azithromycin) to P. acnes was tested by disc diffusion method. Among 71 samples collected, 40 (56.3%) P. acnes isolates were cultured and identified. The incidence of P. acnes resistance to more than one antimicrobial was 45%. Antimicrobial resistances were clindamycin 42.5%, erythromycin 40%, azithromycin 23.5% and doxycycline 12.5%, respectively. According to the contingency coefficient test, there was moderate correlation between the resistance pattern of P. acnes to clindamycin (r = 0.485, P = <0.001) and doxycycline (r = 0.433, P = 0.002) and AV severity. There was weak correlation between the resistance pattern of P. acnes to erythromycin (r = 0.333; P = 0.025) and azithromycin (r = 0.321; P = 0.032) and AV severity. In conclusion, there is a correlation between the pattern of P. acnes resistance to doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, azithromycin and severity of AV.

2.
Skinmed ; 18(3): 176-178, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790616

RESUMO

A 33-year-old man, Hamilton-Norwood criteria stage III, and a 34-year-old man, Hamilton-Norwood criteria stage IV, were enrolled in this study and were allocated to two different treatments. The first patient was treated with microneedling and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), while the second patient was treated with microneedling and 5% topical minoxidil. Each patient underwent eight sessions of microneedling treatment, with 2 weeks interval for the first 2 months and 4 weeks interval for the next 4 months. We evaluated the patients at the end of 6th month. Significant improvements were observed earlier on the patient who underwent microneedling and PRP treatment with high overall patient satisfaction. There were no serious side effects observed.


Assuntos
Alopecia/terapia , Técnicas Cosméticas , Minoxidil/administração & dosagem , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...