Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 67(1): 155-164, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37678660

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular technology innovation requires rigorous evaluation in high quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, due to numerous methodological challenges, RCTs evaluating endovascular interventions are complex and potentially difficult to design, conduct, and report. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of reporting of RCTs for endovascular interventions for lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD). DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2021 was performed to identify RCTs including participants with PAD undergoing any infrainguinal lower limb endovascular intervention. Study data were extracted and assessed against the Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials extension for Non-Pharmacological Treatments (CONSORT-NPT) and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklists. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise general study details and reporting standards of the trials. RESULTS: After screening 6 567 abstracts and 526 full text articles, 112 eligible studies were identified, reporting on 228 different endovascular devices and techniques. Details judged sufficient to replicate the investigated intervention were provided for 47 (21%) interventions. It was unclear whether the description was reported with sufficient details in a further 56 (24%), and the description was judged inadequate in 125 (55%). Any intervention descriptions were provided for 184 (81%), with variable levels of detail (some in 134 [59%] and precise in 50 [22%]). Standardisation of intervention or some aspect of this was reported in 25 (22%) trials, but only one specified that adherence to the study protocol would be monitored. CONCLUSION: The quality of the reporting standards of RCTs investigating lower limb endovascular treatments is severely limited because the interventions are poorly described, standardised, and reported. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022288214.


Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Padrões de Referência , Lista de Checagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Syst Rev ; 12(1): 20, 2023 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36788631

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Techniques and devices for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are continuously evolving. High-quality clinical trials limit the variation in how endovascular interventions are described, performed and reported. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the quality of reporting standards in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of endovascular lower limb interventions against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Non-Pharmacologic Treatments (CONSORT-NPT) and template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) framework. METHODS: Randomised trials including participants with peripheral arterial disease undergoing any infra-inguinal lower limb endovascular arterial intervention, searched from Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2021, will be included. All study data, including details of the procedure investigated, will be extracted in keeping with the CONSORT-NPT and TIDieR checklist. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise general study details and reporting standards of the trials. DISCUSSION: The results will be used to inform the design of future RCTs in this area by optimising the way the interventions are described, standardised, and monitored. The systematic review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations at relevant conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022288214.


Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior , Lista de Checagem , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
4.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 107(3): e175-e176, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30266619

RESUMO

Nickel hypersensitivity has been reported in up to 15% of the general population, and cases of nickel allergy have been correlated with use of stainless steel wires. This is a case report of a 48-year-old woman with history of contact allergy to metal who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Severe systemic inflammatory response and cardiac tamponade due to edema of mediastinal tissues developed postoperatively. The patient required removal of stainless steel wires and delayed sternal closure with Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) sutures in addition to intravenous steroids. In patients with hypersensitivity to nickel, other alternatives closure methods should be considered.


Assuntos
Fios Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Tamponamento Cardíaco/etiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Esterno/cirurgia , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/etiologia , Tamponamento Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Tamponamento Cardíaco/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Reoperação , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA