Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 95(3): 377-82, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10711548

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 1996 consensus guidelines for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ACOG, and the American Academy of Pediatrics are affecting obstetric practice and disease occurrence. METHODS: Personnel in hospitals with obstetric services in seven surveillance areas completed surveys about their programs, patient populations, and group B streptococcal disease prevention policies. Survey results were linked to group B streptococcal disease cases identified by active surveillance in 1996 and 1997. An early onset case was defined as a case in which group B streptococci were isolated from a sterile site in the 1st 6 days of life. The number of cases in 1996 and 1997 were compared using a paired t test. Linear regression was used to assess hospital characteristics associated with group B streptococcal disease cases. RESULTS: Of 177 hospitals, 165 (93%) responded, and 96 (58%) of those had group B streptococcal disease prevention policies. Hospitals that established or revised their policies in 1996 had a lower mean number of cases in 1997 than in 1996 (0.58 versus 1.29, P = .006). Linear regression analysis, controlling for number of births, indicated that a hospital's having more black mothers and location in particular states were associated with more cases of disease. Citing the 1996 ACOG reference as the source for hospital group B streptococcal disease prevention policy was associated with fewer cases of group B streptococcal disease (P = .038). CONCLUSION: The publication and adoption of the guidelines were associated with decreasing occurrence of group B streptococcal disease.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus agalactiae , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Lineares , Política Organizacional , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Pediatrics ; 105(1 Pt 1): 21-6, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10617699

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) prevention efforts are based on targeted use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP); applicability of these prevention efforts to infections caused by other organisms is not clear. METHODS: Multicenter surveillance during 1995 to 1996 for culture-confirmed, early-onset sepsis in an aggregate of 52 406 births; matched case-control study of risk factors for GBS and other sepsis. RESULTS: Early-onset disease occurred in 188 infants (3.5 cases per 1000 live births). GBS (1.4 cases per 1000 births) and Escherichia coli (0.6 cases per 1000 births) caused most infections. GBS sepsis less often occurred in preterm deliveries compared with other sepsis. Compared with gestation-matched controls without documented sepsis, GBS disease was associated with intrapartum fever (matched OR, 4.1; CI, 1.2-13.4) and frequent vaginal exams (matched OR, 2.9; CI, 1.1-8. 0). An obstetric risk factor-preterm delivery, intrapartum fever, or membrane rupture >/=18 hours-was found in 49% of GBS cases and 79% of other sepsis. IAP had an adjusted efficacy of 68.2% against any early-onset sepsis. Ampicillin resistance was evident in 69% of E coli infections. No deaths occurred among susceptible E coli infections, whereas 41% of ampicillin-resistant E coli infections were fatal. Ninety-one percent of infants who developed ampicillin-resistant E coli infections were preterm, and 59% of these infants were born to mothers who had received IAP. CONCLUSIONS: Either prenatal GBS screening or a risk-based strategy could potentially prevent a substantial portion of GBS cases. Sepsis caused by other organisms is more often a disease of prematurity. IAP seemed efficacious against early-onset sepsis. However, the severity of ampicillin-resistant E coli sepsis and its occurrence after maternal antibiotics suggest caution regarding use of ampicillin instead of penicillin for GBS prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus agalactiae , Resistência a Ampicilina , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Prematuro/epidemiologia , Doenças do Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Trabalho de Parto , Masculino , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...