Teaching Dental Students to Understand the Temporomandibular Joint Using MRI: Comparison of Conventional and Digital Learning Methods.

The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the performance of dental students in interpreting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using two learning methods (conventional and digital interactive learning) and to examine the usability of the digital learning object (DLO). The DLO consisted of tutorials about MRI and anatomic and functional aspects of the TMJ. In 2014, dental students in their final year of study who were enrolled in the elective "MRI Interpretation of the TMJ" course comprised the study sample. After exclusions for nonattendance and other reasons, 29 of the initial 37 students participated in the study, for a participation rate of 78%. The participants were divided into two groups: a digital interactive learning group (n=14) and a conventional learning group (n=15). Both methods were assessed by an objective test applied before and after training and classes. Aspects such as support and training requirements, complexity, and consistency of the DLO were also evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). A significant between-group difference in the posttest results was found, with the conventional learning group scoring better than the DLO group, indicated by mean scores of 9.20 and 8.11, respectively, out of 10. However, when the pretest and posttest results were compared, both groups showed significantly improved performance. The SUS score was 89, which represented a high acceptance of the DLO by the users. The students who used the conventional method of learning showed superior performance in interpreting the TMJ using MRI compared to the group that used digital interactive learning.

Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface-an in vitro radiographic study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic images and the impact of digital filters in evaluating the bone-implant interface. METHODS: Titanium implants were inserted into 74 fresh bovine ribs blocks, 37 fitting tight to the bone walls (simulating the existence of osseointegration) and 37 with a gap of 0.125 mm (simulating a failure in the osseointegration process). Periapical radiographs were taken with conventional film and two phosphor plate systems [VistaScan® (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) and Express® (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland)]. Digital radiographs were investigated with and without enhancement filters. Three blinded examiners assessed the images for the presence of juxtaposition in the bone-implant interface using a five-point Likert scale. Sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each variable. Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements were analyzed using Kendall's concordance test. RESULTS: Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements were >0.80 for both digital and conventional images. Conventional radiographs (AUC = 0.963/CI = 0.891 to 0.993) and digital images with high enhancement filters such as Caries2 (AUC = 0.964/CI = 0.892 to 0.993), Endo (AUC = 0.952/CI = 0.875 to 0.988) and Sharpen3 (AUC = 0.894/CI = 0.801 to 0.954) showed the greatest accuracy for evaluating the bone-implant interface. Original images from both digital systems and the further enhancement filters tested showed low sensitivity for the diagnosis task tested. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs or digital radiographs with high-pass filters could help enhance diagnosis on implant-bone interface.

Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors with impact on the conspicuity (possibility to detect) of the buccal bone condition around dental implants in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Titanium (Ti) or zirconia (Zr) implants and abutments were inserted into 40 bone blocks in a way to obtain variable buccal bone thicknesses. Three combinations regarding the implant-abutment metal (TiTi, TiZr, or ZrZr) and the number of implants (one, two, or three) were assessed. Two CBCT units (Scanora 3D - Sc and Cranex 3D - Cr) and two voxel resolutions (0.2 and 0.13 mm) were used. Reconstructed sagittal images (2.0 and 5.0 mm thickness) were evaluated by three examiners, using a dichotomous scale when assessing the condition of the buccal bone around the implants. A multivariate logistic regression was performed using examiners' detection of the buccal bone condition as the dependent variable. Odds ratio (OR) were calculated separately for each CBCT unit. RESULTS: Implant-abutment combination (ZrZr) (OR Sc = 19.18, OR Cr = 11.89) and number of implants (3) (OR Sc = 12.10, OR Cr = 4.25) had major impact on buccal bone conspicuity. The thinner the buccal bone, the higher the risk that the condition of the buccal bone could not be detected. The use of lower resolution protocols increased the risk that buccal bone was not properly detected (OR Sc = 1.46, OR Cr = 2.00). For both CBCT units, increasing the image reconstruction thickness increased the conspicuity of buccal bone (OR Sc = 0.33, OR Cr = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Buccal bone conspicuity was impaired by a number of factors, the implant-abutment material being the most relevant. Acquisition and reconstruction factors had minor impact on the detection of the buccal bone condition.