RESUMO
PURPOSE: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has become routine practice in orthognathic treatment planning; however, most surgeons do not perform the planning without technical assistance, nor do they routinely evaluate the accuracy of the postoperative outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to propose a reproducible method that would allow surgeons to have an improved understanding of VSP orthognathic planning and to compare the planned surgical movements with the results obtained. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery cases was used to evaluate the variability between the predicted and obtained movements using craniofacial landmarks and McNamara 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis from computed tomography scans. The demographic data (age, gender, and skeletal deformity type) were gathered from the medical records. The data analysis included the level of variability from the predicted to obtained surgical movements as assessed by the mean and standard deviation. For the overall sample, statistical analysis was performed using the 1-sample t test. The statistical analysis between the Class II and III patient groups used an unpaired t test. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 50 patients who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. The overall evaluation of the mean values revealed a discrepancy between the predicted and obtained values of less than 2.0 ± 2.0 mm for all maxillary landmarks, although some mandibular landmarks were greater than this value. An evaluation of the influence of gender and deformity type on the accuracy of surgical movements did not demonstrate statistical significance for most landmarks (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The method provides a reproducible tool for surgeons who use orthognathic VSP to perform routine evaluation of the postoperative outcomes, permitting the identification of specific variables that could assist in improving the accuracy of surgical planning and execution.
