The role of perinatal palliative care following prenatal diagnosis of major, incurable fetal anomalies: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe prenatal decision-making processes and birth plans in pregnancies amenable to planning perinatal palliative care. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective observational study. SETTING: Nine Multidisciplinary Centres for Prenatal Diagnosis of the Paris-Ile-de-France region. POPULATION: All cases of major and incurable fetal anomaly eligible for TOP where limitation of life-sustaining treatments for the neonate was discussed in the prenatal period between 2015 and 2016. METHODS: Cases of congenital defects amenable to perinatal palliative care were prospectively included in each centre. Prenatal diagnosis, decision-making process, type of birth plan, birth characteristics, pregnancy and neonatal outcome were collected prospectively and anonymously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Final decision reached following discussions in the antenatal period. RESULTS: We identified 736 continuing pregnancies with a diagnosis of a severe fetal condition eligible for TOP. Perinatal palliative care was considered in 102/736 (13.9%) pregnancies (106 infants); discussions were multidisciplinary in 99/106 (93.4%) cases. Prenatal birth plans involved life-sustaining treatment limitation and comfort care in 73/736 (9.9%) of the pregnancies. The main reason for planning palliative care at birth was short-term inevitable death in 39 cases (53.4%). In all, 76/106 (71.7%) infants were born alive, and 18/106 (17%) infants were alive at last follow-up, including four with a perinatal palliative care birth plan. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of severe and incurable fetal disorders were potentially amenable to limitation of life-sustaining interventions. Perinatal palliative care may not be considered a universal alternative to termination of pregnancy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Perinatal palliative care is planned in 10% of continuing pregnancies with a major and incurable fetal condition eligible for TOP.

Simple actions to support breastfeeding can avoid unwanted weaning in infants younger than 6 months hospitalized for bronchiolitis: A before/after study (Bronchilact II).

BACKGROUND: Admission to hospital with bronchiolitis may adversely affect breastfeeding. Correct advice and support have been pointed out as a determining factor. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a telephone survey to evaluate a set of actions to promote breastfeeding during hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis. METHODS: Population: All patients 6 months of age or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study. Patients discharged home whose parents accepted to be contacted by phone were also included. INTERVENTION: We established a set of actions to promote breastfeeding (posters, flyers, staff training, and equipment) in all pediatric wards attending to these patients. COMPARISON: This was a cross-sectional study conducted during two epidemic seasons of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care hospital. Data on continued breastfeeding at 3 months (0.5-6; median, range) postdischarge were collected by telephone and compared with the same set of data collected from patients with bronchiolitis in the same setting the year before the intervention. OUTCOME: We conducted a telephone survey to evaluate whether some actions regarding breastfeeding might diminish the risk of unwanted weaning during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. The primary outcome was the proportion of stopped or reduced breastfeeding at discharge. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether there were factors associated with breastfeeding modification. RESULTS: The results of the evaluation before intervention (phase 1) are published by Heilbronner et al. In Phase 1 of our study, 84 patients were included and 43 mothers (51%) reported that breastfeeding was modified by hospitalization of their child: 20.4% stopped, 14% switched to partial breastfeeding, and 16.6% reduced breastfeeding. These mothers stated that causes of breastfeeding disturbances were lack of support and advice (63%), followed by severity of the child's respiratory disease (32%), logistical hospital difficulties (30%), and personal organizational issues (9.3%). The intervention took place in September. After the intervention, 50 patients could be included in the study between October 1and December 31, 2016. Among them, 40 (80%) mothers kept breastfeeding as before, four (8%) stopped, four (8%) switched to partial breastfeeding, and two (4%) reduced breastfeeding without stopping. Bronchiolitis was more severe among patients with altered breastfeeding in terms of ventilatory support. CONCLUSION: Bronchiolitis is a high-risk event for breastfeeding disruption but interventions to promote breastfeeding might help to prevent the risk of unwanted weaning. More severe bronchiolitis probably poses the highest risk of weaning and the need for supplementary nutrition.