Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840396

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is not fully understood how different degrees of improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical outcome measures translate to improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as those assessing itch, symptoms, sleep, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), and work productivity. OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis of three clinical studies assessed how more robust improvements in clinical responses are associated with improvements in PROs and QoL. METHODS: Data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up) were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to upadacitinib (15 or 30 mg) or placebo once daily (alone or in combination with topical corticosteroids). The mean percentage improvement from baseline to week 16 and percentage of patients achieving responses at week 16 were summarized by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and validated Investigator Global Assessment of Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) response level categories. RESULTS: A total of 2392 patients from the three trials were included in the analysis. Increasingly greater mean percentage improvement and proportion of patients achieving response was observed at higher clinical response levels (i.e., stepwise pattern). Mean percentage improvement and proportion of patients achieving response exceeded 69% and 70% at EASI ≥ 90 and vIGA-AD 0/1, respectively, for most PROs including Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale, Patient Oriented Eczema Measure, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. CONCLUSIONS: Greater degrees of clinical responses are related to more robust improvements across multiple dimensions impacted by AD, including itch, skin pain, sleep, anxiety, depression, and QoL.

2.
Drugs Aging ; 39(9): 715-727, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35859228

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease in any age group, but also in older patients (≥ 65 years of age). Since older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, limited data specifically on this growing population are available, e.g. regarding the safety and performance of biological treatment. AIMS: We aimed to give insight into this specific population by comparing the drug survival and safety of biologics in older patients with that in younger patients. METHODS: In this real-world observational study, data from 3 academic and 15 non-academic centers in The Netherlands were extracted from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. Biologics included in this study were tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbid disease status, and all adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. All AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were studied to check whether they could be classified as serious AEs (SAEs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall 5-year drug survival and split according to reasons of discontinuation (ineffectiveness or AEs) were constructed. Cox regression models were used to correct for possible confounders and to investigate associations with drug survival in both age groups separately. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores during the first 2 years of treatment and at the time of treatment discontinuation were assessed and compared between age groups. RESULTS: A total of 890 patients were included, of whom 102 (11.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Body mass index, sex, and distribution of biologic classes (e.g. TNFα, IL12/23) were not significantly different between the two age groups. A significantly higher CCI score was found in older patients, indicative of more comorbidity (p < 0.001). The 5-year ineffectiveness-related drug survival was lower for older patients (44.5% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.006), and the 5-year overall (≥ 65 years: 32.4% vs. < 65 years: 42.1%; p = 0.144) and AE-related (≥ 65 years: 82.1% vs. < 65 years: 79.5%; p = 0.913) drug survival was comparable between age groups. Of all AEs (n = 155) that led to discontinuation, 16 (10.3%) were reported as SAEs but these only occurred in younger patients. After correcting for confounders, the same trends were observed in the drug survival outcomes. Linear regression analyses on PASI scores showed no statistical differences at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study in a substantial, well-defined, prospective cohort provides further support that the use of biologics in older patients seems well-tolerated and effective. Biologic discontinuation due to AEs did not occur more frequently in older patients. Older patients discontinued biologic treatment more often due to ineffectiveness, although no clear difference in PASI scores was observed. More real-world studies on physician- and patient-related factors in older patients are warranted.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 33(7): 1224-1231, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31056788

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conjunctivitis is common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in general and a commonly reported adverse event in AD clinical trials with dupilumab. OBJECTIVE: To survey opinions and experience about conjunctivitis occurring in AD, including those during dupilumab treatment in a group of AD experts from the International Eczema Council (IEC). METHODS: Electronic survey and in-person discussion of management strategies. RESULTS: Forty-six (53.5%) IEC members from 19 countries responded to the survey. Consensus was reached for several statements regarding diagnostic workup, referral and treatment. IEC members suggest that patients with AD should (i) routinely be asked about ocular complaints or symptoms, (ii) obtain information about the potential for conjunctivitis before starting dupilumab therapy and (iii) if indicated, be treated with dupilumab despite previous or current conjunctivitis. In cases of new-onset conjunctivitis, there was consensus that dupilumab treatment should be continued when possible, with appropriate referral to an ophthalmologist. LIMITATIONS: The study relies on expert opinion from dermatologists. Responses from few dermatologists without dupilumab access were not excluded from the survey. CONCLUSION: The IEC recommends that dermatologists address conjunctivitis in patients with AD, especially during treatment with dupilumab.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Conjuntivite/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Conjuntivite/etiologia , Consenso , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pomadas/uso terapêutico , Soluções Oftálmicas/uso terapêutico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(8): 1336-1342, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29485224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although atopic dermatitis (AD) is a very common skin disease, data on the percentage of patients with really difficult-to-treat AD are scarce. From socio-economic perspective, it is important to have more insight into these numbers, as new very effective, but expensive, treatment options will be available in the near future for difficult-to-treat AD. Estimating the number of patients with AD using oral immunosuppressive drugs can give an impression of the percentage of difficult-to-treat patients in the total AD population. OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of the use of oral immunosuppressive drugs in patients with AD in the Netherlands. METHODS: Prescription data of oral immunosuppressive drugs in the Netherlands were extracted from a pharmaceutical database (NControl) containing data of 557 million prescriptions and 7.2 million patients. An algorithm, based on the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes, was used to identify patients with AD. The prescription of oral immunosuppressive drugs in patients with AD between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2017 was evaluated. RESULTS: Based on the algorithm, 65 943 patients with AD were selected. 943 patients with AD (1.4%) used cyclosporine A, methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolic acid. Methotrexate was most commonly used, followed by azathioprine and cyclosporine A. A switch in medication was rarely seen. In the evaluation period, a decrease in the prescription of cyclosporine A was seen, together with an increase in the prescription of methotrexate. In 31% of the patients who stopped treatment, the discontinuation took place within the first months of treatment. CONCLUSION: In this study population, 1.4% of the patients with AD used oral immunosuppressive drugs for their eczema in a 5-year period. Methotrexate was the most commonly used systemic drug in the Netherlands for the treatment of AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Países Baixos
11.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 29(4): 375-382, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine is frequently used in severe eczema. It is converted in the liver into active metabolites, including 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and methylated 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). In the past, the therapeutic potential of azathioprine may have not been fully utilized. Recent investigations on inflammatory bowel disease have led to a better understanding of azathioprine metabolism and optimizing treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether measuring thiopurine metabolites in circulation can improve the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis and/or chronic hand/foot eczema. METHODS: Azathioprine metabolite levels were measured in eczema patients during maintenance treatment (Part I) and dose escalation (Part II). Clinical effectiveness, hepatotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression were analyzed and TPMT genotype was assessed. RESULTS: A wide variation in metabolite levels in all dose groups was observed. In Part I (32 patients), there were no significant differences in 6-TGN levels between clinical responders and non-responders (p = .806). No hepatoxicity or myelotoxicity was observed. In Part II, all 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels increased during dose escalation. Hypermethylation was observed in 2/8 patients. CONCLUSION: For individual eczema patients treated with azathioprine, routinely measuring 6-TGN and 6-MMP can be helpful in optimizing azathioprine dose, improving clinical effectiveness, and preventing side effects.


Assuntos
Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Mercaptopurina/metabolismo , Adulto , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Dermatite Atópica/metabolismo , Dermatite Atópica/patologia , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Eczema/metabolismo , Eczema/patologia , Feminino , Nucleotídeos de Guanina/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Mercaptopurina/análogos & derivados , Mercaptopurina/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tionucleotídeos/análise , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(3): 768-775, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28865094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guidelines discourage the use of systemic corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis (AD), but their use remains widespread. OBJECTIVES: To reach consensus among an international group of AD experts on the use of systemic corticosteroids for AD. METHODS: A survey consisting of statements accompanied by visual analogue scales ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'neutral' to 'strongly agree' was distributed to the International Eczema Council (IEC). Consensus was reached in agreement on a statement if < 30% of respondents marked to the left of 'neutral' towards 'strongly disagree'. RESULTS: Sixty of 77 (78%) IEC members participated. Consensus was reached on 12 statements, including that systemic corticosteroids should generally be avoided but can be used rarely for severe AD under certain circumstances, including a lack of other treatment options, as a bridge to other systemic therapies or phototherapy, during acute flares in need of immediate relief, in anticipation of a major life event or in the most severe cases. If used, treatment should be limited to the short term. Most respondents agreed that systemic corticosteroids should never be used in children, but consensus was not reached on that statement. The conclusions of our expert group are limited by a dearth of high-quality published evidence. If more stringent consensus criteria were applied (e.g. requiring < 20% of respondents marking towards 'strongly disagree'), consensus would have been reached on fewer statements. CONCLUSIONS: Based on expert opinion from the IEC, routine use of systemic corticosteroids for AD is generally discouraged and should be reserved for special circumstances.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Consenso , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(2): 271-275, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28925576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral immunosuppressive drugs are frequently prescribed in young women with atopic dermatitis (AD). Immunocompromised patients may have a higher risk of developing high-risk HPV infections, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical carcinoma. Most literature on patients using oral immunosuppressive drugs is available in organ transplant patients. Literature on the risk of developing cervical carcinoma in AD patients treated with oral immunosuppressive drugs is lacking. At this moment, there is no clear guideline/consensus on this topic, but in daily practice, questions arise concerning whether this risk is increased and whether more intensive screening in women using immunosuppressive drugs should take place. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of cervical carcinoma in women with AD treated with oral immunosuppressive drugs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study in two university medical centres in the Netherlands, all female adult AD patients receiving oral immunosuppressive drugs (cyclosporine A, azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and extended release tacrolimus) for more than 2 months between 1989 and 1 January 2014 were included. Patient files in the national histopathology register were screened for PAP3a, CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and cervical carcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 257 female AD patients with one or more treatment episodes from 1989 until 1 January 2014 were identified and included in this study. In 189 patients (73.5%), results of cervical examination were reported in the national histopathology database. Median total duration of treatment in these 189 women was 407.0 days (IQR 243.0-940.0). No cervical carcinoma during or following immunosuppressive therapy was found in our patient group. CONCLUSIONS: No intensified screening programme for cervical neoplasia seems necessary for women with AD using oral immunosuppressive drugs.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Administração Oral , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 42(5): 503-508, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28585727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and asthma often coexist. Both diseases can have a major impact on the lives of children with AD and their caregivers. AIM: To investigate the association of patient characteristics, comorbidities and impact of AD on children who have both asthma and AD. METHODS: Children with AD (n = 140) were selected from a larger cohort of children with a reported use of asthma medication. The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess Quality of Life (QoL), and the Self-Assessed Eczema Area and Severity Index (SA-EASI) was used to measure AD severity. Characteristics assessed included: age, sex, and the number and type of atopic comorbidities. Medication use for AD was defined using the total number of AD prescriptions, the number of different topical AD prescriptions and the highest potency topical corticosteroid (TCS) used. Determinants of AD severity and QoL were evaluated using Spearman rank tests. RESULTS: The following factors were most strongly associated with a lower QoL: characteristics of AD lesions (Spearman Rs = 0.61-0.69, P < 0.01), a higher SA-EASI score (Rs = 0.54, P < 0.01) and a larger number of different topical AD prescriptions (Rs = 0.38, P < 0.01). The following factors were correlated with more severe AD: age (Rs = -0.36, P < 0.01), larger number of different TCS preparations used (Rs = 0.27, P < 0.05) and larger number of TCS prescriptions (Rs = 0.25, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In children with asthma and AD, the number of TCS preparations used is associated with lower QoL and increased AD severity.


Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Atópica/classificação , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 28(3): 242-245, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27549213

RESUMO

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a very common chronic inflammatory skin disease requiring long-term treatment. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is used off-label in treatment of patients with severe AD failing Cyclosporin A (CsA) treatment, however clinical efficacy is observed in only half of the AD patients. In blood, MPA levels are known to have a large interindividual variability. Low MPA exposure and increased enzyme activity correlates with the presence of UGT1A9 polymorphisms. In this retrospective study, 65 adult AD patients treated with MPA were classified as responder or non-responder to MPA treatment. UGT1A9 polymorphisms were determined using PCR. A significantly higher number of UGT1A9 polymorphisms was found in the group that did not respond to MPA treatment. Of the patients that carried a UGT1A9 polymorphism, 85.7% were non-responsive to MPA treatment. This implies that non-responsiveness in AD patients is more likely to occur in carriers of a UGT1A9 polymorphism. In a binary logistic regression analysis the odds ratio (OR) was 8.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.93-80.17). Our results show that UGT1A9 polymorphisms can be used to identify patients with non-responsiveness to MPA. Patients with UGT1A9 polymorphisms might benefit from higher MPA dosage.


Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/genética , Dermatite Atópica/patologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Medicina de Precisão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , UDP-Glucuronosiltransferase 1A
17.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 6: 44, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27980722

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although total IgE levels have been proposed as a biomarker for disease severity in atopic dermatitis (AD) and are increased in the majority of AD patients, they do not correlate with disease severity during short-term follow-up. During the synthesis of immunoglobulins, free light chains (Ig-FLCs) are produced in excess over heavy chains. In comparison with IgE molecules, Ig-FLCs have a very short serum half-life. Therefore, Ig-FLCs might be more suitable as a biomarker for disease severity during follow-up. Recent studies showed increased serum levels of kappa Ig-FLCs in infants with AD, correlating with disease severity. The aim of this study was to investigate serum kappa Ig-FLC levels in adults with AD, and their correlation to disease severity. METHODS: Serum kappa If-FLC and total IgE levels were measured in 82 moderate to severe AD patients and 49 non-atopic controls. Blood was collected from patients before start of treatment with potent topical steroids (European classification: III-IV). 32 patients were treated during a clinical admission, and in this subpopulation a second blood sample was taken after 2 weeks of treatment. Clinical severity was determined by the Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) severity score and a panel of serum biomarkers, including thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC). RESULTS: Serum kappa Ig-FLCs levels in adult AD patients were not increased compared to non-atopic controls. Moreover, we observed no correlation between kappa Ig-FLC serum levels and disease severity determined by SASSAD and a panel of serum biomarkers, including TARC. Serum kappa Ig-FLC levels did also not decrease during treatment. CONCLUSION: There are no differences in serum kappa Ig-FLC levels between adult patients suffering from moderate to severe AD compared to non-atopic controls. Moreover, serum levels of kappa Ig-FLCs cannot be used as a biomarker for disease severity in adult AD.

19.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 30(1): 63-6, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25731072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common condition; it is often chronic and can be difficult to treat. Cyclosporine is used off-label to treat severe hand eczema; however, the evidence for this treatment is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To examine the drug survival of cyclosporine in a daily practice cohort of patients with chronic hand eczema. METHODS: This retrospective daily use study included hand eczema patients who were treated with cyclosporine between 01-06-1999 and 01-06-2014 in two Dutch university hospitals. Patient and treatment characteristics were retrospectively collected from medical charts. First treatment episodes were analysed by means of Kaplan-Meier drug survival curves. Possible determinants of drug survival were analysed by Cox regression models. Treatment effectiveness was analysed with a retrospective physician's global assessment. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were treated with cyclosporine. The median drug survival rate was 0.86 years (10.3 months). The overall drug survival rate after 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years were 61.7%, 45.2%, 18.6% and 13.9% respectively. Main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events, especially early in treatment, and ineffectiveness. After 3 months, a good response to treatment was recorded in 62.9% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine had a median drug survival of 10.3 months. Especially patients with recurrent vesicular hand eczema showed a good treatment response.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatoses da Mão/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Uso Off-Label , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...