Midsession reversal task with starlings: A quantitative test of the timing hypothesis.

In the Mid-Session Reversal task (MSR), an animal chooses between two options, S1 and S2. Rewards follow S1 but not S2 from trials 1-40, and S2 but not S1 from trials 41-80. With pigeons, the psychometric function relating S1 choice proportion to trial number starts close to 1 and ends close to 0, with indifference (PSE) close to trial 40. Surprisingly, pigeons make anticipatory errors, choosing S2 before trial 41, and perseverative errors, choosing S1 after trial 40. These errors suggest that they use time into the session as the preference reversal cue. We tested this timing hypothesis with 10 Spotless starlings. After learning the MSR task with a T-s Inter-Trial Interval (ITI), they were exposed to either 2 T or T/2 ITIs during testing. Doubling the ITI should shift the psychometric function to the left and halve its PSE, whereas halving the ITI should shift the function to the right and double its PSE. When the starlings received one pellet per reward, the ITI manipulation was effective: The psychometric functions shifted in the direction and by the amount predicted by the timing hypothesis. However, non-temporal cues also influenced choice.

Simple discrimination in stingless bees (Melipona quadrifasciata): Probing for select- and reject-stimulus control.

Simple and conditional discrimination training may produce various types of controlling relations. Responses may be controlled primarily by the positive stimulus (select-control relation) or by the negative stimulus (reject-control relation; the subject excludes the negative stimulus and chooses the positive). Bees learn to respond in simple and conditional discriminations. However, no study has searched for reject-control responding in Melipona bees. We trained Melipona quadrifasciata on a simple discrimination task (S+ vs. S-; e.g., blue vs. yellow) and then probed for stimulus control with two types of probe trials, S+ versus a new stimulus (Select-control probes) and S- versus a new stimulus (Reject-control probes). For Group Different, a new-stimulus color (e.g., white) was used in one type of probe and another color (e.g., black) was used in the other type. For Group Same, a single new-stimulus color was used in both types of probes. On Select probes, the bees always preferred S+ to the new stimulus. On Reject probes, results were mixed. Depending on the colors used in training and probing, bees responded to both stimuli, and even preferred the S-. The data suggest no control by the negative function of the S- and support the select-stimulus control hypothesis of responding.

Animal timing: a synthetic approach.

Inspired by Spence's seminal work on transposition, we propose a synthetic approach to understanding the temporal control of operant behavior. The approach takes as primitives the temporal generalization gradients obtained in prototypical concurrent and retrospective timing tasks and then combines them to synthetize more complex temporal performances. The approach is instantiated by the learning-to-time (LeT) model. The article is divided into three parts. In the first part, we review the basic findings concerning the generalization gradients observed in fixed-interval schedules, the peak procedure, and the temporal generalization procedure and then describe how LeT explains them. In the second part, we use LeT to derive by gradient combination the typical performances observed in mixed fixed-interval schedules, the free-operant psychophysical procedure, the temporal bisection task, and the double temporal bisection task. We also show how the model plays the role of a useful null hypothesis to examine whether temporal control in the bisection task is relative or absolute. In the third part, we identify a set of issues that must be solved to advance our understanding of temporal control, including the shape of the generalization gradients outside the range of trained stimulus durations, the nature of temporal memories, the influence of context on temporal learning, whether temporal control can be inhibitory, and whether temporal control is also relational. These issues attest to the heuristic value of a Spencean approach to temporal control.

Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?

We examined whether temporal learning in a bisection task is absolute or relational. Eight pigeons learned to choose a red key after a t-seconds sample and a green key after a 3t-seconds sample. To determine whether they had learned a relative mapping (short→Red, long→Green) or an absolute mapping (t-seconds→Red, 3t-seconds→Green), the pigeons then learned a series of new discriminations in which either the relative or the absolute mapping was maintained. Results showed that the generalization gradient obtained at the end of a discrimination predicted the pattern of choices made during the first session of a new discrimination. Moreover, most acquisition curves and generalization gradients were consistent with the predictions of the learning-to-time model, a Spencean model that instantiates absolute learning with temporal generalization. In the bisection task, the basis of temporal discrimination seems to be absolute, not relational.

What do humans learn in a double, temporal bisection task: absolute or relative stimulus durations?

The relative-coding hypothesis of temporal discrimination asserts that humans learn to respond to the relative duration of stimuli ("short" and "long"). The most frequently used procedure to test the hypothesis is the double bisection task. In one task, participants learn that red and green are the correct comparisons following 2s (short) and 5s (long) samples respectively. In another task, participants learn that triangle and circle are the correct comparisons following 3.5s (short) and 6.5s (long) samples, respectively. Later the samples of one task are tested with the comparisons of the other task, and vice versa. According to the hypothesis, participants will choose red following a 3.5s sample because that sample is short and red is the comparison that goes with short. Similarly, they will choose circle following 5s samples because that sample is long and circle goes with long. We replicated this procedure and improved it by introducing several sample durations during testing to obtain the whole psychometric function of each task. Results from Experiment 1 only partially corroborated the relative-coding hypothesis. Results from Experiment 2 did not corroborate the hypothesis. The combined data from Experiments 1 and 2 partially corroborate the hypothesis. Alternatively, we present an explanation of relative-coding-like results that posits exclusively absolute coding of temporal stimuli.