Increasing Awareness of Palliative Medicine With the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Project.

Palliative medicine can be essential in helping to align patients' goals of care with their treatment team. Referrals for palliative medicine are more advantageous when initiated in the emergency department as this is the first point of contact for seriously ill patients being admitted to the hospital. This paper highlights a quality improvement project initiated to address knowledge gaps in palliative medicine with emergency department (ED) staff and to increase referrals for palliative medicine from the ED. The palliative medicine staff held an in-service training with the ED staff which focused on defining palliative medicine and the importance of early consults when the patient presents in the ED. Palliative medicine staff also highlighted the differences between palliative medicine and hospice care, when and how to initiate a consult for palliative medicine, as well as how to contact the palliative medicine division. The results showed that after this educational intervention the number of palliative medicine consults increased three-fold. Before the educational intervention, monthly averages for palliative medicine were 6 and after rose to 18.9 per month.

Educating Internal Medicine Residents on Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care at a Community Teaching Hospital.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) currently requires Internal Medicine (IM) GME programs to incorporate educational opportunities for training and structured experiences in Palliative and Hospice Medicine. Miscomprehension of the differences between palliative medicine and hospice care is a barrier for IM residents ordering palliative consults as many residents may underutilize palliative medicine if a patient is not appropriate for hospice. OBJECTIVE: This educational performance improvement (PI) project assessed 3 domains, including Medical Knowledge (MK) of palliative versus hospice medicine at baseline and following a single didactic session. Additionally, the number of palliative consults ordered was used as a surrogate for interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) and patient care (PC) domains. METHODS: An 8-question survey and 30-minute didactic session were created based upon experientially-determined issues most confusing to IM residents. Participants included 33 IM residents (PGY-1s-3 s) from July 2018 (first cohort) and 32 (PGY-1 s and any PGY-2s-3 s who did not participate in the first cohort) from July 2019 (second cohort). RESULTS: 65 of a possible 73 residents participated (89% response rate) Pre-test Questions 5, 6, and 8 correct responses were <50% in both cohorts with average scores, respectively, of 43.1%, 35.4%, and 40%. Residents improved on the post-test for Q5, 6, 8 to, respectively, 80%, 86.7%, and 48.3% (t = 7.68, df = 59, p < 001). Correct Q1 responses declined in the first cohort, but clarification for the second cohort improved from pre-test (36.4%) to post-test (65.5%). The total number of palliative consults placed by IM residents increased as well. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline MK of palliative versus hospice medicine was <50% on 4/8 questions. A brief educational session significantly improved residents' short-term comprehension and increased the number of palliative consults.

Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbations Is Not an Indicator of Poor Outcome and Increased Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Over one million patients are hospitalized each year with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the US. Approximately 20% to 40% of them will develop acute cardiorenal syndrome type 1 (ACRS1) via multiple mechanisms. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2010, 197 patients were diagnosed with ADHF. Initial N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), creatinine levels throughout hospital stay, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay and death were assessed for each patient. ACRS1 was diagnosed when an increase of creatinine > 0.3 mg/dL from baseline was noted during hospital stay. We sought to investigate whether presence of ACRS1 is associated with increased length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation and increased in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with ADHF. RESULTS: Total of 61 (31%) patients experienced ACRS1. Mean hospital stay for ACRS1 patients was 8.43 ± 6.28 days while for non-ACRS1 was 5.06 ± 4.19 (P < 0.0001). Twenty-eight (14%) patients required invasive mechanical ventilation (11 non-ACRS1 vs. 17 ACRS1). ACRS1 was associated with more frequent use of invasive ventilation (odd ratio 3.45, CI 1.52 - 7.79, P = 0.003). Fifteen (8%) patients expired (8 non-ACRS1 vs. 7 ACRS1). There was no difference in mortality between groups (odd ratio 2.07, CI 0.72 - 6.00, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Development of ACRS1 was not associated with increased incidence of in-hospital mortality, but it prolonged hospital stay and need for mechanical ventilation.