Addressing Health Inequities and Disparities in Children With Kidney Disease in Disadvantaged Areas: the Latin American and Caribbean Experience.

Purpose of Review: Compared with high-income countries, healthcare disparities and inequities are more evident in low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries with poorer housing and nutrition conditions. At least 20% of Latin America and the Caribbean are low and lower-middle-income countries. Despite the majority of the other countries being upper-middle income, the United Nations Children's Fund had classified all the regions as "less developed," with limited access to health care for the most vulnerable, the children. Latin America and the Caribbean regions represent an extensive territory with communication limitations and an unstable socio-political and economic environment. After considering the vast population affected by poverty worldwide and the long-term impact of kidney disease starting in childhood, it is crucial to better understand and analyze the multifactorial limiting conditions in accessing specialized care such as pediatric nephrology in disadvantaged areas. Recent Findings: Constraints in accessing basic healthcare in rural areas make it impossible to receive specialized pediatric nephrology care including dialysis and transplantation. Disturbingly, incidence and prevalence figures of acute kidney injury, chronic and end-stage kidney disease in some Latin American and the Caribbean countries are unknown, and these conditions still represent a death sentence for underprivileged populations. However, the monumental efforts of the dedicated healthcare providers and stakeholders that pioneered the actions in the past 50 years have shown remarkable progress in developing pediatric nephology services across the continent. Summary: In this review, we compile some of the latest evidence about the care of children and adolescents with kidney conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean, along with the experiences from the field in the care of these patients facing adverse conditions. We also highlight recommendations to address inequities and disparities.

Animal, Human, and 23Na MRI Imaging Evidence for the Negative Impact of High Dietary Salt in Children.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Conditions typically prevalent in adults such as hypertension, kidney stones, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease are increasing among adolescents and young adults (AYA). The purpose of this review is to describe the association of these conditions to a high salt diet among pediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: We present animal, human, and 23Na MRI evidence associated with the negative impact of high dietary salt in children. Special focus is placed on novel 23Na MRI imaging which reveals the important concept of a third compartment for sodium storage in soft tissue. Finally, we make recommendations on who should not be on a low salt diet. SUMMARY: A high salt intake predisposes children and AYA to considerable morbidity. We exhort the reader to engage in advocacy efforts to curve the incidence and prevalence of high salt-related life-limiting conditions.

Management of severe polyuria in idiopathic Fanconi syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Polyuria is a common problem in patients with tubular diseases, especially for those with CKD and high-output Fanconi syndrome. There are currently no guidelines on how to treat debilitating polyuria, in children or adults, and vasopressin is usually not effective. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A 13-year-old female with idiopathic Fanconi syndrome and an eGFR of 69 mL/min/1.73 m2 was severely affected by polyuria of 5 L per day (voiding at least 11 times during the day and up to 8 times at night), impacting her mood (measured by the RCADS-child) and academic performance at school. In the absence of guidelines and with literature discouraging the use of indomethacin in this condition, we attempted indomethacin treatment at a dose of 2 mg/kg divided in two doses with substantial success. Urine output dropped to 2.5L and this was accompanied by a substantial decrease of her sodium wasting from 24.6 to 7.7 mmol/kg/day. Over the course of 18 months, the patient's eGFR dropped temporarily to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and was 68 mL/min/1.73 m2 at last follow-up. However, a sodium-23 (23Na) MRI of her thigh revealed ongoing moderate sodium decrease in her skin and substantial Na+ decrease in her muscle when compared to age-matched peers with normal kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Indomethacin may be a safe and effective treatment option for polyuria in idiopathic Fanconi syndrome.

Marginal parent donors-Process and ethics.

BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive kidney transplantation for end-stage kidney disease in children has many advantages and may lead to the consideration of marginal parent donors. METHODS: Using the example of the transplant of a kidney with medullary sponge disease from a parent to the child, we review the ethical framework for working up such donors. RESULTS: The four principles of health ethics include autonomy (the right of the patient to retain control over his/her own body); beneficence (healthcare providers must do all they can do to benefit the patient in each situation); non-maleficence ("first do no harm"-providers must consider whether other people or society could be harmed by a decision made, even if it is made for the benefit of an individual patient) and justice (there should be an element of fairness in all medical decisions). Highly motivated donors may derive significant psychological benefit from their donation and may thus be willing to incur more risk. The transplantation team and, ideally, an independent donor advocate team must make a judgment about the acceptability of the risk-benefit ratio for particular potential donors, who must also make their own assessment. The transplantation team and donor advocate team must be comfortable with the risk-benefit ratio before proceeding. CONCLUSIONS: An independent donor advocacy team that focuses on the donor needs is needed with sufficient multidisciplinary ethical, social, and psychological expertise. The decision to accept or reject the donor should be within the authority of the independent donor advocacy team and not the providers or the donor.