Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0279386, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538559

RESUMO

A deep understanding of the cattle gastrointestinal microbiome is crucial to selective breeding high-efficiency animals that produce more and generate less environmental damage. Here we performed the taxonomic identification of Bacterial and Archaeal communities using high throughput 16SrRNA gene sequencing from critical compartments of the gastrointestinal tract of Bradford cattle raised in a natural grassland in the Pampa biome, Brazil. We analyzed 110 samples, including saliva, ruminal fluid, and feces from 36 months old Bradford heifers (weighing on average 343 ± 30 kg by the sampling time). To reduce unexpected variation and confounders, we selected the animals from the same breed, submitted them to the same food source, and collected the samples for three consecutive years from different animals in the same season. Our main goal was to analyze the microbial shifts throughout the gastrointestinal tract to reference future works proposing management strategies and interventions to improve animal nutrition and increase production in the Pampa Biome. To accomplish our objective, we accessed the microbial community differences in groups with a high and low weight gain controlling for food ingestion and quality of grazed pasture. Few taxa were shared among the samples. About 40% of the phyla and 60% of the genera were unique from saliva samples, and 12.4% of the microbial genera were uniquely found in feces. All samples shared only 36.1% of phyla and 7.5% of genera. Differences in microbial diversity and taxa counts were observed. The ruminal fluid presented the lowest microbial richness, while saliva and feces presented the highest microbial richness. On the other hand, saliva and feces also presented more distinct communities between themselves when compared with ruminal samples. Our data showed that the saliva microbiome is not representative of the rumen microbiome and should not be used as an easy-to-collect sample for studies about the rumen microbiome.


Assuntos
Ração Animal , Microbiota , Bovinos , Animais , Feminino , Ração Animal/análise , Rúmen/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Microbiota/genética , Fezes/microbiologia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
2.
Heliyon ; 6(6): e04190, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613104

RESUMO

Intestinal microbiota perform important functions for the health of fishes. Knowing the microbial composition and evaluating the possible effects caused by anthropogenic pollution in the intestinal microbiota of fish populations might represent an important step in defining microbial biomarkers for water pollution. This study evaluated the impact of environmental contamination on the gut microbiota of the livebearer killifish Phalloceros caudimaculatus. The 16S survey using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was used to characterize and compare the microbiota of two P. caudimaculatus populations from streams with different levels of environmental contamination in Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. Twelve bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (around one-third of the total) were shared between both fish populations. They represent the core microbiota of the gut in this species. The dominant phyla were Protebacteria and Firmicutes, with more than 80% of relative abundance. The dominant genus was Burkholderia with more than 35% of the relative abundance irrespective of the environmental condition. We detected a lower microbial diversity (Shannon index and observed OTUs) in fish from the polluted stream compared to the reference stream. The PERMANOVA analysis showed that the intestinal microbial communities from fish living in the polluted stream were distinct from those found in the reference stream (p < 0.05). Finally, we identified Luteolibacter, Methylocaldum and Rhodobacter genera, which correlated strongly with the polluted stream. These taxa might represent potential microbial biomarkers of exposure to environmental contaminants in the guts of fish. Confirmation of these findings in other polluted environments might allow the development of a microbiota-based screening approach for environmental evaluation in ecotoxicological studies in aquatic ecosystems.

3.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ; 113(9): 1299-1312, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32577920

RESUMO

Ruminal microorganisms play a pivotal role in cattle nutrition. The discovery of the main microbes or of a microbial community responsible for enhancing the gain of weight in beef cattle might be used in therapeutic approaches to increase animal performance and cause less environmental damages. Here, we examined the differences in bacterial and fungal composition of rumen samples of Braford heifers raised in natural grassland of the Pampa Biome in Brazil. We aimed to detect microbial patterns in the rumen that could be correlated with the gain of weight. We hypothesized that microorganisms important to digestion process are increased in animals with a higher gain of weight. The gain of weight of seventeen healthy animals was monitored for 60 days. Ruminal samples were obtained and the 16S and ITS1 genes were amplified and sequenced to identify the closest microbial relatives within the microbial communities. A predictive model based on microbes responsible for the gain of weight was build and further tested using the entire dataset., The main differential abundant microbes between groups included the bacterial taxa RFN20, Prevotella, Anaeroplasma and RF16 and the fungal taxa Aureobasidium, Cryptococcus, Sarocladium, Pleosporales and Tremellales. The predictive model detected some of these taxa associated with animals with the high gain of weight group, most of them being organisms that have been correlated to the production of substances that improve the ruminal digestion process. These findings provide new insights about cattle nutrition and suggest the use of these microbes to improve beef cattle breeding.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Bovinos/microbiologia , Fungos/classificação , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Rúmen/microbiologia , Aumento de Peso , Ração Animal/análise , Animais , Bactérias/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Brasil , Bovinos/fisiologia , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Fúngico/genética , Dieta/veterinária , Fezes/química , Fungos/genética , Microbiota , Tipagem Molecular , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Rúmen/metabolismo
4.
Braz J Microbiol ; 51(1): 151-159, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332740

RESUMO

Preterm birth remains the main contributor to early childhood mortality. The vaginal environment, including microbiota composition, might contribute to the risk of preterm delivery. Alterations in the vaginal microbial community structure might represent a risk factor for preterm birth. Here, we aimed to (a) investigate the association between preterm birth and the vaginal microbial community and (b) identify microbial biomarkers for risk of preterm birth. Microbial DNA was isolated from vaginal swabs in a cohort of 69 women enrolled at hospital admission for their delivery. Microbiota was analyzed by high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing. While no differences in microbial diversity measures appeared associated with the spontaneous preterm and full-term outcomes, the microbial composition was distinct for these groups. Differential abundance analysis showed Lactobacillus species to be associated with full-term birth whereas an unknown Prevotella species was more abundant in the spontaneous preterm group. Although we studied a very miscegenated population from Brazil, our findings were similar to evidence pointed by other studies in different countries. The role of Lactobacillus species as a protector in the vaginal microbiome is demonstrated to be also a protector of spontaneous preterm outcome whereas the presence of pathogenic species, such as Prevotella spp., is endorsed as a factor of risk for spontaneous preterm delivery.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Microbiota , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/diagnóstico , Vagina/microbiologia , Adulto , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Biomarcadores/análise , Brasil , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Lactobacillus/classificação , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/microbiologia , Gravidez , Prevotella/classificação , Prevotella/patogenicidade , RNA Ribossômico 16S , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
5.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ; 111(4): 551-561, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29127623

RESUMO

Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed differences in bacterial composition between men's and women's restrooms and other common areas within the same public building. Bacterial DNA samples were collected from restrooms and halls of a three-floor building from the Federal University of Pampa, RS, Brazil. The bacterial community was characterized by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing. Throughout all samples, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Beta diversity metrics showed that the structure of the bacterial communities were different among the areas and floors tested, however, only 6-9% of the variation in bacterial communities was explained by the area and floors sampled. A few microorganisms showed significantly differential abundance between men's and women's restrooms, but in general, the bacterial communities from both places were very similar. Finally, significant differences among the microbial community profile from different floors were reported, suggesting that the type of use and occupant demographic within the building may directly influence bacterial dispersion and establishment.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Biodiversidade , Poeira/análise , Microbiologia Ambiental , Microbiota/fisiologia , Brasil , Ambiente Controlado , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Universidades
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...